He steals others codes and claims it as his own.

--

Newsgroup Trolls. Read about mine here http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads
The list grows. Leythos the stalker http://www.leythosthestalker.com, David
H. Lipman, Max M Wachtell III aka What's in a Name?, Fitz,
Rhonda Lea Kirk, Meat Plow, F Kwatu F, George Orwell



"Dustin Cook" <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1171922604.959362.153050@h3g2000cwc.googlegro ups.com...
> On Feb 19, 4:17 pm, "4Q" <paul_z...@hushmail.com> wrote:
>> Dustin Cook wrote:
>> > On Feb 18, 11:26 pm, "4Q" <paul_z...@hushmail.com> wrote:
>> > > Dustin Cook wrote:
>> > > > "4Q" <paul_z...@hushmail.com> wrote in
>> > > >news:1171850573.103492.57950@m58g2000cwm.googlegr oups.com:
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>> > > > It's assembler... Are you going to make fun of my sloppy almost 10
>> > > > year
>> > > > old assembler routines too? *grin*
>>
>> <hold that thought>
>>
>> > ...It's no secret that the
>> > criterror routine was taken in part from Ibrary v2.0 written by Thomas
>> > Hanlin
>>
>> *HAHA* One minute it's *your* assembler, next we find out that the
>> code belongs to Thomas Hanlin and you mearly tlib'd his work then
>> pretended you wrote it. You are a deceptive little AV turd.
>
> Actually, no. some of the code belongs to thomas, some is mine. This
> is all actually common knowledge, I'm surprised you didn't know. I
> made no effort to hide where the code came from when I was using it
> years ago, writing.. lame self replicating programs that nobody wanted
> then, and nobody wants now.
>
> Since you didn't bother to show the differences between the original
> and mine, it's a safe bet you really don't have even that little
> amount of coding skill. When you mentioned someone should use a
> debugger, you didn't actually mean you did ya?
>
> unlike yourself tho, I don't live in the fantasy world that Vx is the
> begin/ending of all, I grew up.... One day, you will too.
>
>> <snip>
>>
>> > The only dirt your going to be thrashing about is 10+ year old code,
>> > way over, done, nobody cares.
>>
>> Now everyone knows you have been
>> caught with your pants down, pretending
>> you wrote Hanlin's library function.
>> Accussing PCButts of ripping then
>> calling Mandragore and Vecna code
>> rippers (proof please). You ****tard
>> turncoat.
>
> Caught with my pants down? 4Q, your making a big deal about 10 year
> old code.. 10 years ago man.. hehehe.
> I didn't pretend to write anything, hanlins function isn't the same
> thing that I posted years ago. Their are differences between them.
> more than tlibbing I'm afraid.
>
> I didn't call vecna or mandragore anything, I used it as a reference
> point. Vecna and mandragore both at some point read others code,
> studied it, modified it, and learned from it. As most programmers do.
> We didn't actually call this code ripping then. And nobody really
> thinks of it as code ripping now, except for.. you apparently. with
> regard to myself, and none of the others.
>
> You've also been making some assinine claims which painfully tell me
> what little programming skill you actually possess on your own. No
> wonder I never saw anything from you when I was active vx, you
> couldn't code anything then, and you haven't bothered to learn
> anything now?
>
> 1. BugHunter doesn't use string scanning.
> 2. I am not antivirus, BugHunter does not search for viruses.
> 3. The best you can come at me with is 10 year old code that I didn't
> author entirely by myself. Wow!
> 4. Even after telling you the files are different, you couldn't find
> out how. You assumed wrongly, again, that I just tlibbed it. You
> really should take an assembler dump of the file, since the hex editor
> isn't helping you.
> 5. You will not find any reference using a hex editor to any Charon
> Software in that object file. What you will find is ibrary code
> comments start and end, which I did preserve. the code however in the
> middle that actually does the work, is not the same as his. His
> routine was originally designed only for the ibrary internal
> functions. It's not even a routine available thru the library that you
> could call. I took that apart, and made a stand alone int24h handler
> out of it, which is what the obj file I posted is. Tom Hanlins is
> integrated into the library, can only be accessed by it's own routines
> and does nothing to help you with crit error handling. Mine does. Yes,
> it's based originally on his code, but it's no longer his design. We
> call this an improvement over the original idea. Read up on patents
> sometime. Same idea.
>
> If you can still call toms and mine the same thing even after the fact
> one doesn't work outside the librarys own routines and the other
> doesn't work with them, but works independently, then you can call me
> a code ripper, if you like.
>
>
> Now, if you really want to play code ripper games, everybody else
> besides the first person who wrote "Hello World" is a code ripper.
> Everybody who uses someone elses library functions, sophos, avg, you
> guys here me? , to 4Q we're all code rippers!
>
>
>
> And before you try tearing me to pieces in usenet, you best brush up
> on programming. String scanners and checksum based scanning are/is two
> entirely different technologies. Offly sad that you couldn't tell the
> difference.
>
> Oh, btw 4Q, yes, I stalled getting your shell accounts to you, They've
> been online for 2 weeks now. *grin*. I did lose the bet tho, I
> expected you would blow up and switch sides 3 weeks ago. hehehe. You
> are, indeed, predictable. You can understand of course why HHI
> wouldn't want to help you now, right? You can't be trusted with
> anything.
>
>
>