What is your opinion on cracked anti-spywares?

[Vanguard]

"Quwen Qyiz" <EverybodyScanNow@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1168019503.792763.114340@51g2000cwl.googlegro ups.com...
> Okay, let me answer a few things here:
>
> 1: I know that it is impossible for a crack to be completely clean.
> Just pretend.
> 2: I know that no program will ever get EVERY trace of malware. Just
> pretend.
> 3: No, I am not seeking approval, this is for research.
>


You want us to waste time discussing pretendware?

[Quwen Qyiz]

> You want us to waste time discussing pretendware?

Good lord, you people need to get out more. This is for an ethics
paper. There's no reason to get so stuffy about a question. What time
are you wasting? The 7 seconds it takes to type 'yes' or 'no'?

[James E. Morrow]

In article <enllit$k1d$1@aioe.org>, no@mail.invalid says...
> "Quwen Qyiz" <EverybodyScanNow@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1167938917.757842.258570@42g2000cwt.googlegro ups.com...
> > I'm doing a survey, and I'm interested in having your opinion. What do
> > you think of illegally crack anti-spywares, provided it's completely
> > clean and works 100%?
> >
>
>
> Perfectly clean and cracked software. Decide on which one you want.
> You can't have both. You reap what you sow. If you decide to go
> ****ing prostitutes, condom or not, YOU chose to take the risk that the
> "crack" is something more than letting you steal use.
>
>

Let us consider the logic of the situation. Whom shall I trust to help
secure my computer system, known developer who publishes openly a
software security application or a thief? What is the potential cost of
the later choice? There is no honor among thieves.

--
James E. Morrow
Email to: jamesemorrow@email.com

[Ed]

I think they all would and do use illegal software, just won't admit
it....guaranteed......

"James E. Morrow" <jamesemorrow@email.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.2008d1d53e27767a989736@newsgate.x-privat.org...
> In article <enllit$k1d$1@aioe.org>, no@mail.invalid says...
>> "Quwen Qyiz" <EverybodyScanNow@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:1167938917.757842.258570@42g2000cwt.googlegro ups.com...
>> > I'm doing a survey, and I'm interested in having your opinion. What do
>> > you think of illegally crack anti-spywares, provided it's completely
>> > clean and works 100%?
>> >
>>
>>
>> Perfectly clean and cracked software. Decide on which one you want.
>> You can't have both. You reap what you sow. If you decide to go
>> ****ing prostitutes, condom or not, YOU chose to take the risk that the
>> "crack" is something more than letting you steal use.
>>
>>
>
> Let us consider the logic of the situation. Whom shall I trust to help
> secure my computer system, known developer who publishes openly a
> software security application or a thief? What is the potential cost of
> the later choice? There is no honor among thieves.
>
> --
> James E. Morrow
> Email to: jamesemorrow@email.com

[Tx2]

In article <1168052873.979286.314830@s80g2000cwa.googlegroups .com>,
EverybodyScanNow@gmail.com thought we might be interested in the
following...

> Good lord, you people need to get out more. This is for an ethics
> paper. There's no reason to get so stuffy about a question. What time
> are you wasting? The 7 seconds it takes to type 'yes' or 'no'?

And you have still failed to answer my questions.
You are a troll.

*plonk*


--
My reply address is invalid
Please post replies to the group...