Leythos wrote:
> In article <ZdCdnQD2AtC3wgjYnZ2dnUVZ_rDinZ2d@bresnan.com>,
> shplink@removeme.shplink.com says...
>
>>I have no problems including Nick's product, if it's OK with most.
>
>
> While I've never used it myself, I believe it should be included based
> on reliable reviews of the product.
>
Thank you all, I'll go ahead and include it on the next update. While at
it, if anyone sees anything else that needs to be updated / changed,
please let me know. I'll wait a couple of weeks before updating (either
by the next posting or the one after the next.)

Regards,
--
the alt.privacy.spyware FAQ:
http://shplink.com/misc/FAQ.htm