Virusburst

[Dustin Cook]

"pcbutts1" <pcbutts1@****leythosthestalker.com> wrote in
news:wI-dnVwpfY-J-hnYnZ2dnUVZ_v2nnZ2d@giganews.com:

> Why do you get mad at me when your SAS does not work and my Spyerase
> does? Why is there more and more posts from people with problems with

As you know, I'm neutral in any threads involving you. This comes purely
from a coding standpoint, and not from any personal feelings towards
yourself.. Ok?

Your batch file relies on certain malware having a constant filename. If
the malware changes filename for any reason, your batch file will miss it
entirely. SAS and many other programs (including mine) do not rely on the
name of a suspected malware file, but rather a signature. Something which
makes it unique....


> SAS?. There has never been a post from anyone about any of my stuff
> that said it did not work,or that it is slow, or that it crashed their
> system. Why is that? because my stuff works. How many awards has SAS

Your batch file only works if the file isn't read only and has a constant
name. If it does not, your batch file will miss it.

> won? My retail version, which has been out only 2 months has already
> won 4 times for best new product. My removal tool Spyerase, which I'm
> sure you already tested has already been downloaded over 1000 times
> and I only advertise that one in the newsgroups. Spyerase has been
> hacked and probed and ripped apart by everybody and nothing can be
> said about it because it works. Fix your product Nick, grow up and
> stop crying and I won't have to post alternative products to people
> who need help.


I reitterate: I am not ripping on your product, merely pointing out a few
observations regarding differences between the programs your comparing.




--
Dustin Cook
Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool -V1.9.4
web: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
email: bughunter.dustin@gmail.com.removethis
Last updated: December 18th, 2006

[Dustin Cook]

"Nick Skrepetos" <nskrepetos@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:1166332281.726134.111870@n67g2000cwd.googlegr oups.com:

>
> pcbutts1 wrote:
>> Why do you get mad at me when your SAS does not work and my Spyerase
>> does? Why is there more and more posts from people with problems with
>> SAS?. There has never been a post from anyone about any of my stuff
>> that said it did not work,or that it is slow, or that it crashed
>> their system. Why is that? because my stuff works. How many awards
>> has SAS won? My retail version, which has been out only 2 months has
>> already won 4 times for best new product. My removal tool Spyerase,
>> which I'm sure you already tested has already been downloaded over
>> 1000 times and I only advertise that one in the newsgroups. Spyerase
>> has been hacked and probed and ripped apart by everybody and nothing
>> can be said about it because it works. Fix your product Nick, grow up
>> and stop crying and I won't have to post alternative products to
>> people who need help.
>>
>
> Why don't you link us to your awards and your retail version. I would
> love to see that. Yeah, my product does not work, that's why it's on
> Spyware Warrior's trusted/recommended list, and that's why KVBC News
> (TV Station) in Las Vegas did a story on it:
> http://www.kvbc.com/Global/story.asp...av=menu107_2_7
>
> 1000 downloads? Wow. SUPERAntiSpyware only has over 2 million users. I
> guess more SpyErase is more popular.
>
> It's ok - everyone knows the facts here.

Hmm... I just don't know what I could possibly add to this...


--
Dustin Cook
Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool -V1.9.4
web: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
email: bughunter.dustin@gmail.com.removethis
Last updated: December 18th, 2006

[Dustin Cook]

=?UTF-8?B?zqYgS3dhdHUgzqY=?= <kwai-fung.pei@invalid.chinanet.ch> wrote
in news:em1h81$4bb$1@aioe.org:

> pcbutts1 wrote:
>> Use Spyerase, fast and free. It now has over 1500 signatures to
>> remove all variants of Virusburst,Spysheriff and others.This tool is
>> designed to specifically
>> remove virusburst. Scan time is about 2 minutes.
>>
>
> You are so stupid Butts that you don't even understand what you stole
> form Stuart's code of RogueFix at ==
> http://www.internetinspiration.co.uk/roguefix.htm
>
> *_ There are NO signtures. _*
>
> RogueFix and it plagiarised form SpyErase do NOT use signatures. Thet
> are hard coded by file name a Registry entries and they both do not
> use "signatures" in detection and removal.

Which makes them useless for any malware which has enough sense to alter
it's filename and/or location.

--
Dustin Cook
Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool -V1.9.4
web: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
email: bughunter.dustin@gmail.com.removethis
Last updated: December 18th, 2006

[pcbutts1]

Not true. My program is updated daily that's why it is so large. I have also
added wildcards and the read only attributes are removed before deletion.

--

Newsgroup Trolls. Read about mine here http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads
The list grows. Leythos the stalker,David H. Lipman, Max M Wachtell III aka
What's in a Name?,Fitz,
Rhonda Lea Kirk,Meat Plow, F Kwatu F, George Orwell



"Dustin Cook" <spamfilterineffect.see.sig@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:Xns989DEB5F18623HHI2948AJD832@69.28.186.121.. .
> "pcbutts1" <pcbutts1@****leythosthestalker.com> wrote in
> news:wI-dnVwpfY-J-hnYnZ2dnUVZ_v2nnZ2d@giganews.com:
>
>> Why do you get mad at me when your SAS does not work and my Spyerase
>> does? Why is there more and more posts from people with problems with
>
> As you know, I'm neutral in any threads involving you. This comes purely
> from a coding standpoint, and not from any personal feelings towards
> yourself.. Ok?
>
> Your batch file relies on certain malware having a constant filename. If
> the malware changes filename for any reason, your batch file will miss it
> entirely. SAS and many other programs (including mine) do not rely on the
> name of a suspected malware file, but rather a signature. Something which
> makes it unique....
>
>
>> SAS?. There has never been a post from anyone about any of my stuff
>> that said it did not work,or that it is slow, or that it crashed their
>> system. Why is that? because my stuff works. How many awards has SAS
>
> Your batch file only works if the file isn't read only and has a constant
> name. If it does not, your batch file will miss it.
>
>> won? My retail version, which has been out only 2 months has already
>> won 4 times for best new product. My removal tool Spyerase, which I'm
>> sure you already tested has already been downloaded over 1000 times
>> and I only advertise that one in the newsgroups. Spyerase has been
>> hacked and probed and ripped apart by everybody and nothing can be
>> said about it because it works. Fix your product Nick, grow up and
>> stop crying and I won't have to post alternative products to people
>> who need help.
>
>
> I reitterate: I am not ripping on your product, merely pointing out a few
> observations regarding differences between the programs your comparing.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Dustin Cook
> Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool -V1.9.4
> web: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
> email: bughunter.dustin@gmail.com.removethis
> Last updated: December 18th, 2006
>

[Dustin Cook]

"pcbutts1" <pcbutts1@****leythosthestalker.com> wrote in
news:_ZKdnVq93qMS7xnYnZ2dnUVZ_u63nZ2d@giganews.com :

> There are over 30 thousand lines of code in

You must have made several additions since I've seen it...


--
Dustin Cook
Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool -V1.9.4
web: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
email: bughunter.dustin@gmail.com.removethis
Last updated: December 18th, 2006

[pcbutts1]

Also you are forgetting that Spyerase is just a tool that targets a certain
type of Malware only not the whole shebang. That's why it works better for
that type of spyware.

--

Newsgroup Trolls. Read about mine here http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads
The list grows. Leythos the stalker,David H. Lipman, Max M Wachtell III aka
What's in a Name?,Fitz,
Rhonda Lea Kirk,Meat Plow, F Kwatu F, George Orwell



"Dustin Cook" <spamfilterineffect.see.sig@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:Xns989DEB5F18623HHI2948AJD832@69.28.186.121.. .
> "pcbutts1" <pcbutts1@****leythosthestalker.com> wrote in
> news:wI-dnVwpfY-J-hnYnZ2dnUVZ_v2nnZ2d@giganews.com:
>
>> Why do you get mad at me when your SAS does not work and my Spyerase
>> does? Why is there more and more posts from people with problems with
>
> As you know, I'm neutral in any threads involving you. This comes purely
> from a coding standpoint, and not from any personal feelings towards
> yourself.. Ok?
>
> Your batch file relies on certain malware having a constant filename. If
> the malware changes filename for any reason, your batch file will miss it
> entirely. SAS and many other programs (including mine) do not rely on the
> name of a suspected malware file, but rather a signature. Something which
> makes it unique....
>
>
>> SAS?. There has never been a post from anyone about any of my stuff
>> that said it did not work,or that it is slow, or that it crashed their
>> system. Why is that? because my stuff works. How many awards has SAS
>
> Your batch file only works if the file isn't read only and has a constant
> name. If it does not, your batch file will miss it.
>
>> won? My retail version, which has been out only 2 months has already
>> won 4 times for best new product. My removal tool Spyerase, which I'm
>> sure you already tested has already been downloaded over 1000 times
>> and I only advertise that one in the newsgroups. Spyerase has been
>> hacked and probed and ripped apart by everybody and nothing can be
>> said about it because it works. Fix your product Nick, grow up and
>> stop crying and I won't have to post alternative products to people
>> who need help.
>
>
> I reitterate: I am not ripping on your product, merely pointing out a few
> observations regarding differences between the programs your comparing.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Dustin Cook
> Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool -V1.9.4
> web: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
> email: bughunter.dustin@gmail.com.removethis
> Last updated: December 18th, 2006
>

[Dustin Cook]

"pcbutts1" <pcbutts1@****leythosthestalker.com> wrote in news:PvadndU5vsVi-
xrYnZ2dnUVZ_sGqnZ2d@giganews.com:

>
>>
>

Wildcards? PCButts, you could put innocent files at risk doing this. You
don't have any real way of knowing if the file your deleting is actually
malware doing it the way you are.



--
Dustin Cook
Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool -V1.9.4
web: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
email: bughunter.dustin@gmail.com.removethis
Last updated: December 18th, 2006

[pcbutts1]

Yes I do. The Zlob variants that Spyerase targets only generates a certain
pattern of various file names and only in certain directories. After adding
all those file new names it is very easy to see the pattern. It is the very
basics of how the signature detections work except it is more direct. It
removes the files from the folders and the registry. There are a lot it
removes that others miss including SAS. As much as I don't like Nick I still
send him samples that I find that SAS misses.

--

Newsgroup Trolls. Read about mine here http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads
The list grows. Leythos the stalker,David H. Lipman, Max M Wachtell III aka
What's in a Name?,Fitz,
Rhonda Lea Kirk,Meat Plow, F Kwatu F, George Orwell



"Dustin Cook" <spamfilterineffect.see.sig@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:Xns989DEEFDA48F2HHI2948AJD832@69.28.186.121.. .
> "pcbutts1" <pcbutts1@****leythosthestalker.com> wrote in
> news:PvadndU5vsVi-
> xrYnZ2dnUVZ_sGqnZ2d@giganews.com:
>
>>
>>>
>>
>
> Wildcards? PCButts, you could put innocent files at risk doing this. You
> don't have any real way of knowing if the file your deleting is actually
> malware doing it the way you are.
>
>
>
> --
> Dustin Cook
> Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool -V1.9.4
> web: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
> email: bughunter.dustin@gmail.com.removethis
> Last updated: December 18th, 2006
>

[Φ Kwatu Φ]

pcbutts1 wrote:
> Also you are forgetting that Spyerase is just a tool that targets a certain
> type of Malware only not the whole shebang. That's why it works better for
> that type of spyware.
>

Then why do reply to almost every post with this reply when clearly a
when no zlob trojan is evident ?

Reason:
You have no understanding of the underlying problem and just willy nilly
post this in reply.

[Dustin Cook]

"pcbutts1" <pcbutts1@****leythosthestalker.com> wrote in
news:UdidnTYAJKBF6RrYnZ2dnUVZ_rylnZ2d@giganews.com :

> Yes I do. The Zlob variants that Spyerase targets only generates a
> certain pattern of various file names and only in certain directories.
> After adding all those file new names it is very easy to see the
> pattern. It is the very basics of how the signature detections work
> except it is more direct. It removes the files from the folders and
> the registry. There are a lot it removes that others miss including
> SAS. As much as I don't like Nick I still send him samples that I find
> that SAS misses.
>

Sorry for the huge delay in a reply, I have been out of state...

I've taken another look at your batch file, and it can easily delete
innocent files should one or more of them happen to be named as in your
script. Your batch file relies on file name and location only to determine
if the file is malware or not. No further checking is done by you. This
puts the user in a very bad situation, imho as you offer no way to undo the
damage.

--
Dustin Cook
Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool -V2.0
web: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
email: bughunter.dustin@gmail.com.removethis
Last updated: January 4th, 2007