pcbutts1 wrote:
> Why do you get mad at me when your SAS does not work and my Spyerase does?
> Why is there more and more posts from people with problems with SAS?. There
> has never been a post from anyone about any of my stuff that said it did not
> work,or that it is slow, or that it crashed their system. Why is that?
> because my stuff works. How many awards has SAS won? My retail version,
> which has been out only 2 months has already won 4 times for best new
> product. My removal tool Spyerase, which I'm sure you already tested has
> already been downloaded over 1000 times and I only advertise that one in the
> newsgroups. Spyerase has been hacked and probed and ripped apart by
> everybody and nothing can be said about it because it works. Fix your
> product Nick, grow up and stop crying and I won't have to post alternative
> products to people who need help.
>
>


I rip it apart.

It is NOT yours and never was yours. You stole the source code from
Stuart == http://www.internetinspiration.co.uk/roguefix.htm

As a matter of fact, "it does NOT work." The core of the utility is
dependent upon a a Windows 5.1 only component that doesn't work well.
What you stole from Stuart never worked well to begin with. Stuart's
tool was never given any sanction as anything but a third rate copy-cat
of noahdfear and S!Ri's tools and S!ri's tool is top rated.

You posted on September 20 ==
"My new tool in the fight against Spyware/malware is a detection and
removal utility to clean computers with the Windows 2000/XP operating
system"

SpyErase will NOT work on a Windows 5.0 platform. You are so stupid you
didn't even realise that the core utility in Windows 5.1 is not
available in Windows 5.0

You have no retail software. That is a bold face lie. You make it up
to bolster your stance. The fact is it does not exist "we" know it and
you know it.

In that same post we saw that you had gone to Stuart's web page and
copied Stuart's spelling errors. You idiot "Spyshefiff" Bwaha, ha, ha.
And that wass not the only spelling error. Hmmm was that a trap for a
pending litigation against you ? We wonder. Since RogueFix is a lousy
utility to begin with was it really a trap created just for you Butts ?
Much like the Bobby who sits by the side of the road with his lights
off waiting for a speeder going 10 Km/hr more that the posted limit.

We also know that your claim to the number of downloads is bloated. We
have tracked the number of times you have changed the 55 position strong
password and when ever we got a new copy you chnaged the password. You
are so stupid. "We" were getting you to give "us" the password so many
times ! ROFLOL One of group would get a create a false post, you'd
reply and then give us the password. We would then download the copy of
SpyErase and do it over and over again compare all the versions we
obtained from you. Even after I tell you this we still will be able to
con you into giving us the password and we will continue download it.

It's too bad my relatives are in Baltimaore and not in California. If
they were, you would find this Limey there and not here for the Holidays.