Virusburst

[Beauregard T. Shagnasty]

Default User wrote:

> "Nick Skrepetos" <nskrepetos@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>pcbutts1 wrote:
[crap]
>>
>> I am sure lots of people here have tried to download SUPERAntiSpyware
>> here with the intetion to possibly purchase and then did not do so
>> because the link you provided was invalid.
>
> Not only that, but he is using your copyright on the name
> SUPERAntiSpyware on his site, which could give you the right to
> confiscate his domain. It's no different than confiscating the
> domain of a Phish perpetrator, and in this case I'd say any
> reasonable person would believe he is usurping your good name for
> illegal purposes.

Not only that, buttface cannot spell. Contents of his bogus file:

"Relax Nick don't die from a heart attack, I am not a theif"

--
-bts
-Motorcycles defy gravity; cars just suck

[Nick Skrepetos]

Default User wrote:
> On 7 Jan 2007 20:46:45 -0800, "Nick Skrepetos" <nskrepetos@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >pcbutts1 wrote:
> >> I believe you did steal it you and Leythos the stalker. You probably did it
> >> and planted it somewhere to make it look like I did it. Sent Dustin a bogus
> >> email or something. You can threaten me all you want Nick but until I do
> >> something illegal there is nothing you or your attorney can do about it.
> >> This link is still valid Nick.
> >> http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads/SUPERAntiSpyware.exe
> >>
> >
> >You are misleading people thinking they can download from your link.
> >That is costing me business, which equals money - that is the basis of
> >a lawsuit.
> >
> >I am sure lots of people here have tried to download SUPERAntiSpyware
> >here with the intetion to possibly purchase and then did not do so
> >because the link you provided was invalid.
> >
> >In fact, those of you that are willing to sign a written statement to
> >that fact, please contact me directly.
>
> Not only that, but he is using your copyright on the name SUPERAntiSpyware
> on his site, which could give you the right to confiscate his domain. It's
> no different than confiscating the domain of a Phish perpetrator, and in
> this case I'd say any reasonable person would believe he is usurping your
> good name for illegal purposes.

My attorneys are looking into filing action that will impact PCButts
the most so he will understand he can't do this to people. He may hide
from everyone on the newsgroup, but under court order his hosting
company will be required to produce his contact information, etc.

[pcbutts1]

It did that because you don't know what you are doing. The only it copies
from backup locations is wininet.dll and it is checked before it copies it.
If it copied a bad file then you modified it wrong because you don't know
what you are doing. Leave it alone.

--

Newsgroup Trolls. Read about mine here http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads
The list grows. Leythos the stalker http://www.leythosthestalker.com, David
H. Lipman, Max M Wachtell III aka What's in a Name?, Fitz,
Rhonda Lea Kirk, Meat Plow, F Kwatu F, George Orwell



"Dustin Cook" <spamfilterineffect.see.sig@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:Xns98B1F018CAFDBHHI2948AJD832@69.28.186.121.. .
> "pcbutts1" <pcbutts1@leythosthestalker.com> wrote in
> news:kICdnVt50vivJzzYnZ2dnUVZ_vShnZ2d@giganews.com :
>
>> Look I'm not going to sit here and argue assembly language with you or
>> anybody. It won't do any good your mind is already made up. You are
>
> I wasn't attempting to start an Argument, I simply wanted an idea of your
> .. ehh, programming skillset. Since you wouldn't even take a guess, nor
> do you apparently know how to cheat and just look up the routines, you
> want to play word games instead; It makes me really suspect you are,
> generally speaking, full of ****, AND, a code thief.
>
>> starting to sound like Nick. If you want to argue with someone then
>> argue with Leythos the stalker he claims to be a programmer he
>> probably modified your code. It was not me. Ask leythos the stalker
>> what happened to his Newsfeed account.
>
> That's the thing, the code itself isn't modified, only a couple of my
> text strings, and only partially. Btw, the person whom did the hex
> editing disabled one of the logging commands...Another reason you should
> only download programs from the author. They tend to work as designed
> that way.
>
> Your spyerase program is a garbled together patch job of other people's
> work. It doesn't do everything you've said, either. No backups, no
> renaming, just deletion and possibly replace if you can find what you
> call a clean backup. I've done a silly test with your program. I made it
> look for a file it thought was bad, due to your stupid method of
> detection (filenames only) and guess what? It replaced the "bad" file
> with a byte for byte duplicate it thinks is clean, simply because of the
> folder in which it found the copy!
>
> BugHunter is by no means perfect, It can/does/has suffered from false
> alarms, but that's certainly NOT due to some silly "if file says
> britneystits.exe" it MUST be bad.
>
>
> --
> Dustin Cook
> Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool -V2.0
> web: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
> email: bughunter.dustin@gmail.com.removethis
> Last updated: January 4th, 2007

[pcbutts1]

He doesn't have a copyright on the name. That little icon on his website is
a fraud. I'm sorry you believe him.

--

Newsgroup Trolls. Read about mine here http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads
The list grows. Leythos the stalker http://www.leythosthestalker.com, David
H. Lipman, Max M Wachtell III aka What's in a Name?, Fitz,
Rhonda Lea Kirk, Meat Plow, F Kwatu F, George Orwell



"Default User" <default@user1.invalid> wrote in message
news:j125q2lssgukc4d6vr5ved4mopq4lb15su@4ax.com...
> On 7 Jan 2007 20:46:45 -0800, "Nick Skrepetos" <nskrepetos@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>pcbutts1 wrote:
>>> I believe you did steal it you and Leythos the stalker. You probably did
>>> it
>>> and planted it somewhere to make it look like I did it. Sent Dustin a
>>> bogus
>>> email or something. You can threaten me all you want Nick but until I do
>>> something illegal there is nothing you or your attorney can do about it.
>>> This link is still valid Nick.
>>> http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads/SUPERAntiSpyware.exe
>>>
>>
>>You are misleading people thinking they can download from your link.
>>That is costing me business, which equals money - that is the basis of
>>a lawsuit.
>>
>>I am sure lots of people here have tried to download SUPERAntiSpyware
>>here with the intetion to possibly purchase and then did not do so
>>because the link you provided was invalid.
>>
>>In fact, those of you that are willing to sign a written statement to
>>that fact, please contact me directly.
>
> Not only that, but he is using your copyright on the name SUPERAntiSpyware
> on his site, which could give you the right to confiscate his domain.
> It's
> no different than confiscating the domain of a Phish perpetrator, and in
> this case I'd say any reasonable person would believe he is usurping your
> good name for illegal purposes.

[pcbutts1]

You said that before and nothing happened. Why do you say that
superantispyware is copyrighted when it is not. Are you too broke to afford
$45 to get one?
http://www.copyright.gov/

--

Newsgroup Trolls. Read about mine here http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads
The list grows. Leythos the stalker http://www.leythosthestalker.com, David
H. Lipman, Max M Wachtell III aka What's in a Name?, Fitz,
Rhonda Lea Kirk, Meat Plow, F Kwatu F, George Orwell



"Nick Skrepetos" <nskrepetos@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1168295818.820824.25040@51g2000cwl.googlegrou ps.com...
>
> Default User wrote:
>> On 7 Jan 2007 20:46:45 -0800, "Nick Skrepetos" <nskrepetos@yahoo.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >pcbutts1 wrote:
>> >> I believe you did steal it you and Leythos the stalker. You probably
>> >> did it
>> >> and planted it somewhere to make it look like I did it. Sent Dustin a
>> >> bogus
>> >> email or something. You can threaten me all you want Nick but until I
>> >> do
>> >> something illegal there is nothing you or your attorney can do about
>> >> it.
>> >> This link is still valid Nick.
>> >> http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads/SUPERAntiSpyware.exe
>> >>
>> >
>> >You are misleading people thinking they can download from your link.
>> >That is costing me business, which equals money - that is the basis of
>> >a lawsuit.
>> >
>> >I am sure lots of people here have tried to download SUPERAntiSpyware
>> >here with the intetion to possibly purchase and then did not do so
>> >because the link you provided was invalid.
>> >
>> >In fact, those of you that are willing to sign a written statement to
>> >that fact, please contact me directly.
>>
>> Not only that, but he is using your copyright on the name
>> SUPERAntiSpyware
>> on his site, which could give you the right to confiscate his domain.
>> It's
>> no different than confiscating the domain of a Phish perpetrator, and in
>> this case I'd say any reasonable person would believe he is usurping your
>> good name for illegal purposes.
>
> My attorneys are looking into filing action that will impact PCButts
> the most so he will understand he can't do this to people. He may hide
> from everyone on the newsgroup, but under court order his hosting
> company will be required to produce his contact information, etc.
>

[Nick Skrepetos]

pcbutts1 wrote:
> You said that before and nothing happened. Why do you say that
> superantispyware is copyrighted when it is not. Are you too broke to afford
> $45 to get one?
> http://www.copyright.gov/
>
> --
>

Here is an excerpt from the law for your reference:

"Copyright protection subsists from the time the work is created in
fixed form. The copyright in the work of authorship immediately becomes
the property of the author who created the work. Only the author or
those deriving their rights through the author can rightfully claim
copyright."

[Dustin Cook]

"pcbutts1" <pcbutts1@leythosthestalker.com> wrote in
news:1u-dnVU8jI0peD_YnZ2dnUVZ_uKknZ2d@giganews.com:

> It did that because you don't know what you are doing. The only it
> copies from backup locations is wininet.dll and it is checked before
> it copies it. If it copied a bad file then you modified it wrong
> because you don't know what you are doing. Leave it alone.

PcButts, idiot savant that you most certainly are; I program in assembler
and a variety of HLL based languages. You can't even write your own ****ing
scripts, and you want to tell me I don't know what I'm doing when it comes
to exploiting one? You couldn't code a "Hello World" program if your sorry
existance depended on it. You don't even cut/paste/hex edit without
screwing something up; or leaving the original copyrights in by mistake...
Thief.

Your script does not at any time verify the file it's fixing to copy is a
good file. It assumes it is simply because of the name and location; No
content analysis is performed. You are, as another ex VxEr said, "Are not a
coder." You don't understand code. Btw PcButts, You'd be smart to try to
change the subject away from code... I've changed some of my evil ways, but
I can't resist a good discussion on low level code.... And, I do still
enjoy schooling stupid people... Let's Dance, yes?



--
Dustin Cook
Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool -V2.0
web: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
email: bughunter.dustin@gmail.com.removethis
Last updated: January 4th, 2007

[Dustin Cook]

Leythos <void@nowhere.lan> wrote in
news:MPG.200cb1a9a6cc136b989763@adfree.Usenet.com:

> In article <1u-dnVU8jI0peD_YnZ2dnUVZ_uKknZ2d@giganews.com>, pcbutts1
> @leythosthestalker.com says...
>> The only it copies
>> from backup locations is wininet.dll and it is checked before it
>> copies it.
>
> Your batch file doesn't check the "backup" file and it doesn't have
> any ability to check it.

Sure doesn't. The backup was byte for byte the same as the file it thought
was bad. It replaced a "bad" file, with a "good" file, based solely on it's
name and location; NOT on what the file actually was. His reliance on other
peoples programs is the work of a sloppy cut/paste job.



--
Dustin Cook
Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool -V2.0
web: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
email: bughunter.dustin@gmail.com.removethis
Last updated: January 4th, 2007

[pcbutts1]

Here's another one
"Do I have to register with your office to be protected?
No. In general, registration is voluntary. Copyright exists from the moment
the work is created. You will have to register, however, if you wish to
bring a lawsuit for infringement of a U.S. work. "

And this one
"Before an infringement suit may be filed in court, registration is
necessary for works of U.S. origin. "

This one too!
"How is a copyright different from a patent or a trademark?
Copyright protects original works of authorship, while a patent protects
inventions or discoveries. Ideas and discoveries are not protected by the
copyright law, although the way in which they are expressed may be. A
trademark protects words, phrases, symbols, or designs identifying the
source of the goods or services of one party and distinguishing them from
those of others. "

Oops I almost forgot this one
"What is copyright?
Copyright is a form of protection grounded in the U.S. Constitution and
granted by law for original works of authorship fixed in a tangible medium
of expression. Copyright covers both published and unpublished works."

Now the moral of the story is. You can't copyright a word. Your
Superantispyware.com is not my superantispyware.exe. Your threats and no
action makes you a stupid fool.


--

Newsgroup Trolls. Read about mine here http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads
The list grows. Leythos the stalker http://www.leythosthestalker.com, David
H. Lipman, Max M Wachtell III aka What's in a Name?, Fitz,
Rhonda Lea Kirk, Meat Plow, F Kwatu F, George Orwell



"Nick Skrepetos" <nskrepetos@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1168307569.306384.79870@51g2000cwl.googlegrou ps.com...
>
> pcbutts1 wrote:
>> You said that before and nothing happened. Why do you say that
>> superantispyware is copyrighted when it is not. Are you too broke to
>> afford
>> $45 to get one?
>> http://www.copyright.gov/
>>
>> --
>>
>
> Here is an excerpt from the law for your reference:
>
> "Copyright protection subsists from the time the work is created in
> fixed form. The copyright in the work of authorship immediately becomes
> the property of the author who created the work. Only the author or
> those deriving their rights through the author can rightfully claim
> copyright."
>

[Dustin Cook]

"pcbutts1" <pcbutts1@leythosthestalker.com> wrote in
news:4_WdnRn8rvYKdz_YnZ2dnUVZ_v6tnZ2d@giganews.com :

> You said that before and nothing happened. Why do you say that
> superantispyware is copyrighted when it is not. Are you too broke to
> afford $45 to get one?
> http://www.copyright.gov/

You don't understand copyright law do you? It doesn't have to be formally
registered. It's helpful, but not required. The moment his program was
started, he owns it's copyright. He clearly identifies this in the program
and it's documentation, and it's website. If he wants to make an issue of
this, he might have something to go at you with.

Once your sued, everybody gets to find out for sure whether or not your
Christopher Butts and where or not you really work for NASA. And if you do,
Best hope nobody forwards examples of your work to them....


--
Dustin Cook
Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool -V2.0
web: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
email: bughunter.dustin@gmail.com.removethis
Last updated: January 4th, 2007