Virusburst

[Dustin Cook]

"pcbutts1" <pcbutts1@leythosthestalker.com> wrote in
newsZWdnW7Ah9mMOwDYnZ2dnUVZ_segnZ2d@giganews.com:

> You ****ing troll, If what you believe is true it would have already
> happened. What I say IS true TOLERATE it fool.
>

I have to respectfully disagree. Your signature is a bit misleading. I've
known a couple of those individuals for years, and they never came across
as trolls to myself or many other individuals.


How many years old is your program?

--
Dustin Cook
Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool -V2.0
web: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
email: bughunter.dustin@gmail.com.removethis
Last updated: January 4th, 2007

[pcbutts1]

I started writing spyerase back in June 2005 shortly after Trojan.Zlob was
discovered. It has been thru 3 renames.

--

Newsgroup Trolls. Read about mine here http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads
The list grows. Leythos the stalker http://www.leythosthestalker.com, David
H. Lipman, Max M Wachtell III aka What's in a Name?, Fitz,
Rhonda Lea Kirk, Meat Plow, F Kwatu F, George Orwell



"Dustin Cook" <spamfilterineffect.see.sig@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:Xns98B0A80CFEF5HHI2948AJD832@69.28.186.121...
> "pcbutts1" <pcbutts1@leythosthestalker.com> wrote in
> newsZWdnW7Ah9mMOwDYnZ2dnUVZ_segnZ2d@giganews.com:
>
>> You ****ing troll, If what you believe is true it would have already
>> happened. What I say IS true TOLERATE it fool.
>>
>
> I have to respectfully disagree. Your signature is a bit misleading. I've
> known a couple of those individuals for years, and they never came across
> as trolls to myself or many other individuals.
>
>
> How many years old is your program?
>
> --
> Dustin Cook
> Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool -V2.0
> web: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
> email: bughunter.dustin@gmail.com.removethis
> Last updated: January 4th, 2007

[Nick Skrepetos]

pcbutts1 wrote:
> Before those files are added to Spyerase they are checked and confirmed not
> to be system files on 4 different systems Win2000, XP, server, both laptops
> and desktops. We are now running tests with Vista. There have been zero
> reports from anyone so far but we do keep backups just in case. We even fix
> the damage caused by the real thief's roguefix file.
>
> --
>

Out of curiosity, on Vista how are you getting around the security
restrictions imposed by Vista when trying to delete files out of
certain folders? And the fact that certain folders and registry keys
are virtualized? Do you require your batch file to be run with
administrator privs? What if they have UAC on?

Nick Skrepetos
SUPERAntiSpyware.com
http://www.superantispyware.com

[pcbutts1]

Well we just started or Vista tests so far for the setup we found while
running the setup installer the "Run the program now" or "View the readme
file" etc... check boxes may be convenient for users, they present a
security problem on Vista. Any processes Setup spawns will inherit the same
privileges as Setup -- usually full administrative privileges. We will
either eliminate the [Run] entries, or add OnlyBelowVersion: 0,6 parameters
to prevent them from being displayed on Vista. During setup we can modify
permissions parameters for setting permissions on directories, files, and
registry keys respectively.

There is a program called SetACL. SetACL is a set of routines for managing
Windows permissions (ACLs) from the command line, from scripts and from
programs. These routines can be used from various container or interface
programs. Currently there exist a command line version to be used in batch
files or scripts and an ActiveX control which can be used from any
COM-enabled language (VB, WSH scripts, ...). SetACL works on all Windows NT
based operating systems from Windows 2000 onwards. The newer, the better. It
is open source.



--

Newsgroup Trolls. Read about mine here http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads
The list grows. Leythos the stalker http://www.leythosthestalker.com, David
H. Lipman, Max M Wachtell III aka What's in a Name?, Fitz,
Rhonda Lea Kirk, Meat Plow, F Kwatu F, George Orwell



"Nick Skrepetos" <nskrepetos@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1167962986.217566.298840@11g2000cwr.googlegro ups.com...
>
> pcbutts1 wrote:
>> Before those files are added to Spyerase they are checked and confirmed
>> not
>> to be system files on 4 different systems Win2000, XP, server, both
>> laptops
>> and desktops. We are now running tests with Vista. There have been zero
>> reports from anyone so far but we do keep backups just in case. We even
>> fix
>> the damage caused by the real thief's roguefix file.
>>
>> --
>>
>
> Out of curiosity, on Vista how are you getting around the security
> restrictions imposed by Vista when trying to delete files out of
> certain folders? And the fact that certain folders and registry keys
> are virtualized? Do you require your batch file to be run with
> administrator privs? What if they have UAC on?
>
> Nick Skrepetos
> SUPERAntiSpyware.com
> http://www.superantispyware.com
>

[Leythos]

In article <vfudndk7MaYvWgDYnZ2dnUVZ_tqnnZ2d@giganews.com>, pcbutts1
@leythosthestalker.com says...
> Newsgroup Trolls. Read about mine here http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads
> The list grows. Leythos the stalker http://www.leythosthestalker.com, David
> H. Lipman, Max M Wachtell III aka What's in a Name?, Fitz,
> Rhonda Lea Kirk, Meat Plow, F Kwatu F, George Orwell

As long as you ask me to reply, by posting my name in your messages,
I'll keep showing your own posts that show your ethics:

*** WARNING - these links contain foul/pornographic content of an
abusive nature created by PCBUTTS1 and still hosted on his public
website ***

From: pcbutts1
Date: Sat, Jul 15 2006 10:14 pm
Email: "pcbutts1" <pcbutts1@seedsv.com>
Groups: 24hoursupport.helpdesk

You mean these websites?
http://www.pcbutts1.com/rlk/rlk.htm
http://www.pcbutts1.com/license.htm
http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads/max.htm

Wait until you see my new one featuring the one and only Fake MVP Noel
Paton. I will probably add it to this one
http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads/mpv.htm

Lets not forget this one put up after the MVPs thought they were special
and emailed them. They even analyzed the email thinking it was fake.
http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads/wtcpcb.htm .

All four of the trolls went crazy with complaints with this one
especially the Stalker Leythos http://www.pcbutts1.com/cracks.htm lets
not forget this one http://www.pcbutts1.com/Louthe*******.htm .

- -
The best live web video on the internet
http://www.seedsv.com/webdemo.htm
NEW Embedded system W/Linux. We now sell DVR cards.
See it all at http://www.seedsv.com/products.htm
Sharpvision simply the best http://www.seedsv.com



--

spam999free@rrohio.com
remove 999 in order to email me

[Nick Skrepetos]

pcbutts1 wrote:
> Well we just started or Vista tests so far for the setup we found while
> running the setup installer the "Run the program now" or "View the readme
> file" etc... check boxes may be convenient for users, they present a
> security problem on Vista. Any processes Setup spawns will inherit the same
> privileges as Setup -- usually full administrative privileges. We will
> either eliminate the [Run] entries, or add OnlyBelowVersion: 0,6 parameters
> to prevent them from being displayed on Vista. During setup we can modify
> permissions parameters for setting permissions on directories, files, and
> registry keys respectively.
>
> There is a program called SetACL. SetACL is a set of routines for managing
> Windows permissions (ACLs) from the command line, from scripts and from
> programs. These routines can be used from various container or interface
> programs. Currently there exist a command line version to be used in batch
> files or scripts and an ActiveX control which can be used from any
> COM-enabled language (VB, WSH scripts, ...). SetACL works on all Windows NT
> based operating systems from Windows 2000 onwards. The newer, the better. It
> is open source.
>
>

So you are going to change the permissions on folders, files and
registry keys and alter the way a user has their security set up?
Basically exposing their system to full infection? What about limited
accounts where admin access is not available?

[pcbutts1]

I thought you were smarter then that Nick. I was wrong. If the need comes
that permissions need to be changed then they will be changed and changed
back. Why would I leave their system vulnerable? And if they need to be
changed for deletion it will be the file only not the whole directory unless
that directory needs to be deleted. All that may be a mute point anyways
because spyerase should be run in safe mode and to log into safe mode you
need admin rights. Now lay off the bottle and stop trying to punch holes in
Spyerase.

--

Newsgroup Trolls. Read about mine here http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads
The list grows. Leythos the stalker http://www.leythosthestalker.com, David
H. Lipman, Max M Wachtell III aka What's in a Name?, Fitz,
Rhonda Lea Kirk, Meat Plow, F Kwatu F, George Orwell



"Nick Skrepetos" <nskrepetos@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1167980382.443846.259270@v33g2000cwv.googlegr oups.com...
>
> pcbutts1 wrote:
>> Well we just started or Vista tests so far for the setup we found while
>> running the setup installer the "Run the program now" or "View the readme
>> file" etc... check boxes may be convenient for users, they present a
>> security problem on Vista. Any processes Setup spawns will inherit the
>> same
>> privileges as Setup -- usually full administrative privileges. We will
>> either eliminate the [Run] entries, or add OnlyBelowVersion: 0,6
>> parameters
>> to prevent them from being displayed on Vista. During setup we can modify
>> permissions parameters for setting permissions on directories, files, and
>> registry keys respectively.
>>
>> There is a program called SetACL. SetACL is a set of routines for
>> managing
>> Windows permissions (ACLs) from the command line, from scripts and from
>> programs. These routines can be used from various container or interface
>> programs. Currently there exist a command line version to be used in
>> batch
>> files or scripts and an ActiveX control which can be used from any
>> COM-enabled language (VB, WSH scripts, ...). SetACL works on all Windows
>> NT
>> based operating systems from Windows 2000 onwards. The newer, the better.
>> It
>> is open source.
>>
>>
>
> So you are going to change the permissions on folders, files and
> registry keys and alter the way a user has their security set up?
> Basically exposing their system to full infection? What about limited
> accounts where admin access is not available?
>

[Nick Skrepetos]

pcbutts1 wrote:
> I thought you were smarter then that Nick. I was wrong. If the need comes
> that permissions need to be changed then they will be changed and changed
> back. Why would I leave their system vulnerable? And if they need to be
> changed for deletion it will be the file only not the whole directory unless
> that directory needs to be deleted. All that may be a mute point anyways
> because spyerase should be run in safe mode and to log into safe mode you
> need admin rights. Now lay off the bottle and stop trying to punch holes in
> Spyerase.
>

You just clearly showed you have no clue how security permissions work
in Vista, and most likley in XP. Anytime you wanna have a little "tech
off" to see who actually know's their stuff, just say the word and I
will be happy to fly you to Oregon or I will fly to you and we can
video it so no one can look stuff up on the web or reference materials
and let's see who really knows what they are talking about. Just let me
know! That way people can see who really knows their stuff! Sound good?

[Chaz P. Klinder]

Nick Skrepetos wrote:
>
> You just clearly showed you have no clue how security permissions work
> in Vista, and most likley in XP. Anytime you wanna have a little "tech
> off" to see who actually know's their stuff, just say the word and I
> will be happy to fly you to Oregon or I will fly to you and we can
> video it so no one can look stuff up on the web or reference materials
> and let's see who really knows what they are talking about. Just let me
> know! That way people can see who really knows their stuff! Sound good?
>


C'mon Nick you know this pussey home-boy won' leave 3424 Topgun St. in
Rosamond CA to come to you and he certainly won't have you come to see
"him". If this happened it'll prove that he is Chris Butts and that he
has lied. It'll prove that he's a man not a woman proving another lie.
Basically he'll never agree because such an arrangement would unravel
all his lies and thus he could *NEVER* agree to this.

Additionally we all know would would win. You, Nick. Butt's wouldn't
be able to lie, cheat and steal to win that contest so again he'd never
agree to it.

[pcbutts1]

The troll thinks he just gave you my name and address. Come on out here and
see me Nick. Don't forget to bring your camera. Hell for that matter anyone
can come by to prove me right.

--

Newsgroup Trolls. Read about mine here http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads
The list grows. Leythos the stalker http://www.leythosthestalker.com, David
H. Lipman, Max M Wachtell III aka What's in a Name?, Fitz,
Rhonda Lea Kirk, Meat Plow, F Kwatu F, George Orwell



"Nick Skrepetos" <nskrepetos@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1168046110.023364.246610@s34g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...
>
> pcbutts1 wrote:
>> I thought you were smarter then that Nick. I was wrong. If the need comes
>> that permissions need to be changed then they will be changed and changed
>> back. Why would I leave their system vulnerable? And if they need to be
>> changed for deletion it will be the file only not the whole directory
>> unless
>> that directory needs to be deleted. All that may be a mute point anyways
>> because spyerase should be run in safe mode and to log into safe mode you
>> need admin rights. Now lay off the bottle and stop trying to punch holes
>> in
>> Spyerase.
>>
>
> You just clearly showed you have no clue how security permissions work
> in Vista, and most likley in XP. Anytime you wanna have a little "tech
> off" to see who actually know's their stuff, just say the word and I
> will be happy to fly you to Oregon or I will fly to you and we can
> video it so no one can look stuff up on the web or reference materials
> and let's see who really knows what they are talking about. Just let me
> know! That way people can see who really knows their stuff! Sound good?
>