Another kudo for SAS

[Nick Skrepetos]

Gaz wrote:
> Nick Skrepetos wrote:
> > Jeanette wrote:
> >> Nick Skrepetos wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Rube Bumpkin wrote:
> >>>> I've made positive comments about SuperAntiSpyware in the past. My
> >>>> daughter (19, honors student in engineering) is home from school for a
> >>>> week. We were just talking about about downloads and spyware. I
> >>>> mentioned SAS, and she said I had already told her about it, and she
> >>>> loves it. She, like her dad, runs AdAware and Spybot as well as SAS.
> >>>> She
> >>>> says that while she's learned the quirks of the other two, she finds
> >>>> SAS
> >>>> much easier to use and at least as effective as the other two put
> >>>> together. She recommends it to her friends at school. The school
> >>>> provides some sort of antispyware protection, in addition to NAV, but
> >>>> she still finds SAS to be very useful.
> >>>>
> >>>> RB
> >>>
> >>> I appreciate the compliments! Ask your daughter to have her school get
> >>> in contact with us, we do provide site distribution solutions for
> >>> educational facilities. We have many schools distributing our product
> >>> to their students.
> >>>
> >>> Nick Skrepetos
> >>> SUPERAntiSpyware.com
> >>> http://www.superantispyware.com
> >>
> >>
> >> I am looking at the website but I would like to know what the difference
> >> is
> >> between the free version and the pro version.
> >>
> >> Jeanette
> >
> > Jeanette,
> >
> > Here is a comparison chart:
> > http://www.superantispyware.com/supe...freevspro.html
> >
> > Nick Skrepetos
> > SUPERAntiSpyware.com
> > http://www.superantispyware.com
>
> I do not tend to actively 'sell' software to my customers, as most of the
> best stuff out there is free anyway. Superantispyware though, is tempting. I
> find that unless the updates and the daily scans are automated to start,
> without user intervention, neither will get done by average users.
>
> As a fire fighting tool, i have no doubt that superantispyware is an
> excellent product, what experience do people have with its resident
> scanning, and its reliability in regards to auto scanning system files??
>
> A question for Nick, if we install the 'free trial professional' with the
> fifteen day fully function, at the end of the fifteen days does the customer
> have the option to move to the free version and the option to buy?? Or, is
> it the option to buy and the option to uninstall?
>
> Gaz

Gaz - at the end of the trial of the Professional they must either
purchase or uninstall. If you install the Free Edition, it will work
without expiring and the user can upgrade if they wish to have the
real-time and scheduling options. It sounds like the Free Edition would
be the way to go for your customers, and they can make the choice to
upgrade the Free Edition if they so choose.

Nick Skrepetos
SUPERAntiSpyware.com
http://www.superantispyware.com

[infidel]

"Drumstick" <to_abuse@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1fcc049971b9a286989714@newsgroups.bellsou th.net...
> In article <H2q8h.4826$J5.1070@trnddc04>, DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net
> says...
> > From: <Greasy Rider @ invalid.com>
> >
> > | On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 21:58:43 GMT, "David H. Lipman"
> > | <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> postulated :
> > |
> > >> It is NOT junk, spyware or trojan. It is legitimate software.
> > |
> > | It's junk if it won't run.
> >
> > I think it is YOUR PC that has the problem. It runs on all the
computers I have installed
> > it on.
> >
> > The ONLY problem I ever saw was a video display problem on a Dell
notebook.
> >
> >
> Runs here just fine and has for awhile...
>
> My brother believed that computer ownership should be licensed.

I agree with your brother.
Do you agree with him?
:-)
r

[Drumstick]

In article <RvA8h.69590$rP1.40966@news-server.bigpond.net.au>,
infi@nonesuch.com says...
>
> "Drumstick" <to_abuse@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:MPG.1fcc049971b9a286989714@newsgroups.bellsou th.net...
> > In article <H2q8h.4826$J5.1070@trnddc04>, DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net
> > says...
> > > From: <Greasy Rider @ invalid.com>
> > >
> > > | On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 21:58:43 GMT, "David H. Lipman"
> > > | <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> postulated :
> > > |
> > > >> It is NOT junk, spyware or trojan. It is legitimate software.
> > > |
> > > | It's junk if it won't run.
> > >
> > > I think it is YOUR PC that has the problem. It runs on all the
> computers I have installed
> > > it on.
> > >
> > > The ONLY problem I ever saw was a video display problem on a Dell
> notebook.
> > >
> > >
> > Runs here just fine and has for awhile...
> >
> > My brother believed that computer ownership should be licensed.
>
> I agree with your brother.
> Do you agree with him?
> :-)
> r
>
>
>

Almost 100 percent, especially after all the calls I get from "friends"
needing me to fix what they mess up and want to pay me with "dinner" if
at all... And NOBODY RTFM anymore!

Maybe there should be a mandatory class like is required in my state for
a hunting license, "computer safety." <smile>

Drum--