It's pretty obvious to most people here that he doesn't know or even
begin to understand what he is talking about. Even better, he is
convinced he does. I think it's pointless to keep replying to him
since he's so smart already that he's figure out that the FTC is his
next step.

I think I was that young and stupid once myself, fortunately for me it
was before computers and I didn't embarrasses myself in front of the
whole world. Wait a minute, I did get into a Cold Fusion argument when
it was all the rage one time, some maybe I did embarrasses myself in
front of the whole world. I'll have to take solace knowing that the
physicists didn't know much about it either.

cmsix

"Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> wrote in
message
news:x_Q6h.64296$Fi1.14837@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> mykeymykey01@yahoo.com wrote:
>
>> we don't know who is implanting it yet ...
>
> I have a good guess.
>
>> ... over 1500 spyware installations have been blocked on this
>> computer
>> alone in the last 10 days, and this computer is only used lightly.
>
> You're on charter.net. A broadband account? Do you have a router and
> a
> firewall? I'll bet not, and what you see is probes from all your
> infected network neighbors, trying to hook you as well. You didn't
> see
> 1500 "installations" ...
>
>> im going to recommend this panda product to you who wish to block
>> this
>> crap out of your system. it puts norton and mcafee to shame.
>
> Other people say Panda spams its users. Maybe this is where all your
> spam is coming from, eh?
>
>> and no i am not a dealer for panda software, just an average
>> internet
>> user.
>
> Yep, pretty much average.
>
> --
> -bts
> -Motorcycles defy gravity; cars just suck