Pete wrote:
> "Nick Skrepetos" <nskrepetos@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1163383847.800734.104090@h54g2000cwb.googlegr oups.com...
> >
> > Pete wrote:
> >> "Gaz" <gazter@msn.com> wrote in message
> >> news:4rpi9bFrptv3U1@mid.individual.net...
> >> >
> >> > "Nick Skrepetos" <nskrepetos@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >> > news:1163366646.405718.162630@b28g2000cwb.googlegr oups.com...
> >> >>
> >> >> Pete wrote:
> >> >>> Does the current version of NOD32 protect against spyware?
> >> >>> I have read conflicting information.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Reviews constantly say just against virus protection; but Eset has on
> >> >>> their
> >> >>> web site:
> >> >>> "A solid anti-malware offering, protecting against viruses, worms,
> >> >>> spyware
> >> >>> and adware." What are they talking about?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Help!
> >> >>
> >> >> In our testing and use of NOD32 in our labs, it does very well against
> >> >> virus type infections, and not quite as well against
> >> >> spyware/malware/adware, etc. - this makes sense as their primary focus
> >> >> is Viruses.
> >> >>
> >> >> I would suggest running another anti-spyware solution along with NOD32
> >> >> as no single product can product against every infection, every day.
> >> >> SUPERAntiSpyware works well with NOD32 and we have many of our
> >> >> customers/users running the two together.
> >> >>
> >> >> Nick Skrepetos
> >> >> SUPERAntiSpyware.com
> >> >> http://www.superantispyware.com
> >> >
> >> > Just let you know, i had a smitfraud variant a couple of days ago that
> >> > would crash superantispyware whenever it tried to update. It was a
> >> > canny
> >> > little monster, as it wouldnt allow the install of avg or the running
> >> > of
> >> > the batch files within smitrem.......
> >> >
> >> > Got around the problem, and eventually was able to update
> >> > superantispyware.....
> >> >
> >> > Gaz
> >> >
> >> Does superantispyware slow the machine down noticeably?? One reason I
> >> bought
> >> NOD32 was its small footprint yet excellent performance.
> >> -Pete
> >
> > SUPERAntiSpyware is designed to be light-weight and not slow down the
> > system. You can try it yourself and see - we have been very careful to
> > keep SUPERAntiSpyware light.
> >
> > Nick Skrepetos
> > SUPERAntiSpyware.com
> > http://www.superantispyware.com
> >
> Wow, from what I read it is very low in resource consumption! Super!!!!
> Most sites recommend Spy Sweeper however, but that is not the final word for
> me.
> Can you point to a single major objective site in which SUPERAntiSpyware
> rates highly? If so, I'll easily buy it for two years.
> Thanks.

Pete - unfortunately there really is no "objective" site that can say
one product is "better" than another - the reason I say that is, no
single anti-spyware/malware/adware application can catch everything on
a given day - it just isn't possible. The number of zero-day (new)
threats that are coming out is mind boggling - we receive and harvest
literally thousands of samples per day/week.

The only things I can point you to are Spyware Warrior's
trusted/recommended applications list here:
http://www.spywarewarrior.com/rogue_...tm#trustworthy

And our CNET Download.com comments here:
http://www.download.com/SUPERAntiSpy....html?sb=2&v=0

If you search the forums (CastleCops, Wilders, Spyware Warrior) you
will find many favorable reviews and "stories" of SUPERAntiSpyware
cleaning infections others won't, or I should say didn't on that
particular day

We are an agile and focused company and do near daily definition
updates to try and stay on top of the latest threats.

You can always download the product and try it for a while, and if you
decide to upgrade to the Professional, then great, if not, enjoy the
Free Edition!

Nick Skrepetos
SUPERAntiSpyware.com
http://www.superantispyware.com