David H. Lipman wrote:
> From: "Chris H." <chrisindcbc@hotmail.com>
>
> | I have been working on an internet security and privacy site for about
> | eight months though. I recently had an email from someone stating that
> | my info is "naive at best". I am not an internet security and privacy
> | expert. I just find the topic very interesting and wanted to build a
> | site on internet security and privacy for my own interest and perhaps
> | even to make some extra money on the side from Google Adsense, which I
> | am actually starting to do. A lot of my info is from various internet
> | security and privacy sites as well as computer magazines such as
> | Maximum PC and Smart Computing. I would really appreciate some honest
> | feedback, which I know I will get here, on the accuracy of my info,
> | specifically spyware, keyloggers, trojan horses, etc. If my content is
> | completely inaccurate, "naive" I would really appreciate some links to
> | some reputable, reliable internet security sites. The site url is
> | http://www.internetsecurity101.net. As I said, I am looking for honest
> | comments, criticism, advice on the content of my site and links to
> | reliable internet security sites. Thanks in advance.
> |
> | Chris H.
>
>
> Needs much work !
>
> Too much advertiseing intermixed with text.
>
> Lack of good information.
>
> For example;
> Under; "Free antivirus software & online virus scan"
> Where's ClamAV, Avast, BitDefender and antivir ? Where's a compare and contrast of options
> ?
>
> As for Web Site scanners, where's; Panda, F-Secure, Kaspersky, BitDefender, Freedom,
> Computer Associates, Dialogues Science, UNA, Microsoft, Ewido, etc, etc.
>
> What about single file submission scanners ?
>
> This was just from a 2 minutes examination. I could go on, and on about what's been left
> out on utilities and software.
>
> Then there a lack of general information. like on Internet worms -- where's the information
> on Network Protocols, vulnerabilities, mitigation and exploitation ?
>
> When it comes to Phishing, you don't even mention APWG !
>
> I don't want to seem like I am attacking your work. It is a good start... as a "draft".
>
> --
> Dave
Thanks Dave for your helpful advice. I didn't see it as an attack at
all. I am aware that my content needs improving. That's why I am
asking for honest feedback on my site. I am currently on Medical Leave
and can't spend a lot of time online, but when I start feeling better,
I am going to be completely redoing my site. That is why I am asking
for advice and feedback now. Thanks again Dave. Have a great weekend!
Chris H
Internet Security 101 - http://www.internetsecurity101.net
Reply With Quote