Anti-Spyware Screening Results

[Ze Muffinman]

In a less mean reply, the "300%" was supposed to be the joke - the
highest possible rating is obviously "100%", so anything higher meant
it detected things that weren't there.
brian wrote:
> "Ze Muffinman" <EverybodyScanNow@gmail.com> wrote in
> news:1162412675.438810.234760@e3g2000cwe.googlegro ups.com:
>
> > SpySheriff
>
> Am I missing something here?

[Brian]

On 1 Nov 2006 20:33:31 -0800, Ze Muffinman wrote:

> In a less mean reply, the "300%" was supposed to be the joke - the
> highest possible rating is obviously "100%", so anything higher meant
> it detected things that weren't there.
> brian wrote:
>> "Ze Muffinman" <EverybodyScanNow@gmail.com> wrote in
>> news:1162412675.438810.234760@e3g2000cwe.googlegro ups.com:
>>
>>> SpySheriff
>>
>> Am I missing something here?

whoops, sorry, I was a little tired and under the weather and didn't catch
it.