In a less mean reply, the "300%" was supposed to be the joke - the
highest possible rating is obviously "100%", so anything higher meant
it detected things that weren't there.
brian wrote:
> "Ze Muffinman" <EverybodyScanNow@gmail.com> wrote in
> news:1162412675.438810.234760@e3g2000cwe.googlegro ups.com:
>
> > SpySheriff
>
> Am I missing something here?