"David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote in message
news:sA82h.5868$ul5.4124@trnddc03...
> From: "sid" <sid.see@willcox.net>
>
>
> | I don't mean any offense, but aren't you exacerbating that which you
> | call "clueless" by offering such not-so-sound advice? It seems to me,
> | if one has enough of a clue to grasp the concept of malware/spyware
> | and to use/activate a firewall, would it not be safe to assume they'd
> | also be able to grasp the concept of allowing a program to pass?
> | Especially since most firewalls I'm aware of, automatically ask
> | permission for such!
> |
> | Perhaps clueless lies closer to home than you realize...
> |
> | Sid
>
> Funny Sid.
>
> This has been discussed before and it is the clueless who are the most
affected/infected and
> it is those that need the Multi AV the most (other than those who use it
professionally ior
> on another's behalf). I came to ther wording based upon experinces in posting
other text
> other the past couple of years.
>
> --
> Dave
> http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
> http://www.ik-cs.com/got-a-virus.htm

I wasn't trying to be funny, Dave.

Nor is it funny, IMNSHO to give clueless people clueless
advice such as its ok to disable their firewall-- good
intentions or not. That your opinion or those of others
may vary in this regard, does nothing to lessen the
danger in such an ill-advised suggestion.

Sid