Spam Trojan Installs Own Anti-Virus Scanner

[d11@anywhere.com]

http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,2034680,00.asp

[PB]

d11@anywhere.com wrote:
> http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,2034680,00.asp

Yes. I posted this very same article to

microsoft.public.security.virus

only to receive a less-than-warm reply/comment.

I guess some of us are just not smart enough to make the "cut" and thus
need not contribute.

PB

[d11@anywhere.com]

On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 13:04:47 -0400, PB <p00lb0y@insightbb.com> wrote:

>d11@anywhere.com wrote:
>> http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,2034680,00.asp
>
>Yes. I posted this very same article to
>
>microsoft.public.security.virus
>
>only to receive a less-than-warm reply/comment.
>
>I guess some of us are just not smart enough to make the "cut" and thus
>need not contribute.
>
>PB

Thank You for the reply.

[David H. Lipman]

From: "PB" <p00lb0y@insightbb.com>

| d11@anywhere.com wrote:
>> http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,2034680,00.asp
|
| Yes. I posted this very same article to
|
| microsoft.public.security.virus
|
| only to receive a less-than-warm reply/comment.
|
| I guess some of us are just not smart enough to make the "cut" and thus
| need not contribute.
|
| PB

I replied to you..

"Nothing really new here.

Vundo Trojans can install WinAntivirus Pro which is a Rogue."

Did you want a hug and a medal for your post ?

There isn't anything new about malware installing so-called anti malware utilities. Spyware
Warrior is full of Rogues that have been installed this way.

--
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
http://www.ik-cs.com/got-a-virus.htm

[PB]

David H. Lipman wrote:
> From: "PB" <p00lb0y@insightbb.com>
>
> | d11@anywhere.com wrote:
>>> http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,2034680,00.asp
> |
> | Yes. I posted this very same article to
> |
> | microsoft.public.security.virus
> |
> | only to receive a less-than-warm reply/comment.
> |
> | I guess some of us are just not smart enough to make the "cut" and thus
> | need not contribute.
> |
> | PB
>
> I replied to you..
>
> "Nothing really new here.
>
> Vundo Trojans can install WinAntivirus Pro which is a Rogue."
>
> Did you want a hug and a medal for your post ?
>
> There isn't anything new about malware installing so-called anti malware utilities. Spyware
> Warrior is full of Rogues that have been installed this way.
>
Not from the likes of you...

[PB]

David H. Lipman wrote:
> From: "PB" <p00lb0y@insightbb.com>
>
> | d11@anywhere.com wrote:
>>> http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,2034680,00.asp
> |
> | Yes. I posted this very same article to
> |
> | microsoft.public.security.virus
> |
> | only to receive a less-than-warm reply/comment.
> |
> | I guess some of us are just not smart enough to make the "cut" and thus
> | need not contribute.
> |
> | PB
>
> I replied to you..
>
> "Nothing really new here.
>
> Vundo Trojans can install WinAntivirus Pro which is a Rogue."
>
> Did you want a hug and a medal for your post ?
>
> There isn't anything new about malware installing so-called anti malware utilities. Spyware
> Warrior is full of Rogues that have been installed this way.
>
Reply 2.

Let's get into it.

You are a smug and arrogant poster who feels they own this ng along with
your select group of friends and defenders.

As I offered this post for information, your reply was non-sequitur and
thus not needed nor did it offer any value.

I do not think you would want to compare brain pans with me.

[David H. Lipman]

From: "PB" <p00lb0y@insightbb.com>


| Reply 2.
|
| Let's get into it.
|
| You are a smug and arrogant poster who feels they own this ng along with
| your select group of friends and defenders.
|
| As I offered this post for information, your reply was non-sequitur and
| thus not needed nor did it offer any value.
|
| I do not think you would want to compare brain pans with me.

Actually it is your attitude that sucks. I merely stated the fact that there is nothing new
in the concept of malware downloading faux anti malware utilities. Smug ? Obviously you
don't want to discuss this subject matter. You think that because you posted a an EWeek
article you should receive a prize or something. Hardly. If anything my answer should have
evoked questions about what other malware has done this in the past besides the Vundo.
Instead, you ignored my response in the MS Virus NG and say here that you got a
"less-than-warm reply/comment".

I think you need to check that attitude problem YOU are exibiting.

< PLONK >

--
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
http://www.ik-cs.com/got-a-virus.htm

[PB]

David H. Lipman wrote:
> From: "PB" <p00lb0y@insightbb.com>
>
>
> | Reply 2.
> |
> | Let's get into it.
> |
> | You are a smug and arrogant poster who feels they own this ng along with
> | your select group of friends and defenders.
> |
> | As I offered this post for information, your reply was non-sequitur and
> | thus not needed nor did it offer any value.
> |
> | I do not think you would want to compare brain pans with me.
>
> Actually it is your attitude that sucks. I merely stated the fact that there is nothing new
> in the concept of malware downloading faux anti malware utilities. Smug ? Obviously you
> don't want to discuss this subject matter. You think that because you posted a an EWeek
> article you should receive a prize or something. Hardly. If anything my answer should have
> evoked questions about what other malware has done this in the past besides the Vundo.
> Instead, you ignored my response in the MS Virus NG and say here that you got a
> "less-than-warm reply/comment".
>
> I think you need to check that attitude problem YOU are exibiting.
>
> < PLONK >
>
Bah. I assert my previous comments as true.

Others may now feel empowered to agree.

[PB]

Leythos wrote:
> In article <KZadnQIt4MvehKHYnZ2dnUVZ_v6dnZ2d@insightbb.com> ,
> p00lb0y@insightbb.com says...
>>> | You are a smug and arrogant poster who feels they own this ng along with
>>> | your select group of friends and defenders.
>
> It's nice to see that you're not mature enough to stay on the high-road,
> that you have to attack. It shows something about you when you sink to
> those levels.
>
> Your link was old news, already seen, and the comment about it being
> less than warmly... was also unnecessary.
>
>
QED

One of the defenders responds.

[pcbutts1]

I agree.

--


The best live web video on the internet http://www.seedsv.com/webdemo.htm
NEW Embedded system W/Linux. We now sell DVR cards.
See it all at http://www.seedsv.com/products.htm
Sharpvision simply the best http://www.seedsv.com



"PB" <p00lb0y@insightbb.com> wrote in message
news:KZadnQIt4MvehKHYnZ2dnUVZ_v6dnZ2d@insightbb.co m...
> David H. Lipman wrote:
>> From: "PB" <p00lb0y@insightbb.com>
>>
>>
>> | Reply 2.
>> |
>> | Let's get into it.
>> |
>> | You are a smug and arrogant poster who feels they own this ng along
>> with
>> | your select group of friends and defenders.
>> |
>> | As I offered this post for information, your reply was non-sequitur and
>> | thus not needed nor did it offer any value.
>> |
>> | I do not think you would want to compare brain pans with me.
>>
>> Actually it is your attitude that sucks. I merely stated the fact that
>> there is nothing new
>> in the concept of malware downloading faux anti malware utilities. Smug
>> ? Obviously you
>> don't want to discuss this subject matter. You think that because you
>> posted a an EWeek
>> article you should receive a prize or something. Hardly. If anything my
>> answer should have
>> evoked questions about what other malware has done this in the past
>> besides the Vundo.
>> Instead, you ignored my response in the MS Virus NG and say here that you
>> got a
>> "less-than-warm reply/comment".
>>
>> I think you need to check that attitude problem YOU are exibiting.
>>
>> < PLONK >
>>
> Bah. I assert my previous comments as true.
>
> Others may now feel empowered to agree.