David H. Lipman wrote:
> From: "Ron Lopshire" <notron@ovbl.org>
>
> | Dave,
> |
> | Would you please address Neil J. Rubenking's points about why he
> | thinks that Ewido/AVG AS is inferior to other AS solutions? I usually
> | pay little attention to these online advertiser supported magazines,
> | but unlike most, he at least provided technical reasons as to why he
> | thinks that Ewido AS is inferior to the others.
> |
> | That said, one of the worst 10 product releases of Q3 2006? I find
> | that _very_ difficult to believe. That itself leads me to believe that
> | there may be more here than meets the eye. Like an agenda.
>
> In May 1988 I had an article published in PC Magazine. I liked it in those days.
> However, over the years they have become biased to their advertisers. Too often I noticed
> they would have a multi-paged article on someproduct line or another and comapre various
> vendors solutions. Often intertwined in those pages were advertisements for one or two of
> the products in that article. They are clearly biased to their paid advertisers.
>
> Can I conclude they may have an agenda set ? yes.
>
> All I care about is that they paid me for my article, the checked cleared and it was during
> the days when they were more ethical.

Thanks, Dave. Just the info for which I was looking.

Ron