Warhol <molarh@hotmail.com>, the low-beam embroiderer, spouted:

> The Elephant Sleeps But Still Remembers > Share "Through the
> Warphole"
>
> Alright, this thread is specifically addressed and provided for
> Draco_Art to raise whatever topic He or she chooses for debate with
> me.
>
> The RULES OF THIS THREAD:

BWAHAHAHAHAHHAAHAH! Ga'rn get ****ed, ya dumb ****.

> 1. NO PERSONAL ATTACKS AT ALL ON THIS THREAD!
> Any name calling, insults, slights, etc. are not welcome.
> The ONLY thing to be done on this thread is logical, analytical, and
> impassioned discussion of whatever topic DA so chooses. I will abide
> by this rule as well. If anyone cannot abide by this rule, you are
> invited to leave or not to post here, ie take it outside.
>
> 2. NO cutting and pasting!
> You may provide a link to an off site article to reference or quote a
> few lines from said article, but no posting article in whole. It is
> cleaner and simpler to just post the link and/ or choose from that
> article what you wish to in order to support your argument.
>
> 3. Posts are a one to one basis. There will be NO PILING on against
> Rat o Artie or myself. If you wish to join the debate, you are of
> course invited to debate me on my stances / arguments. If you wish to
> debate Draco_Art, you MUST FIRST ask His/her permission. Once you
> have entered the debate, you are restricted to ONE POST in response
> to each post from those you are debating.
>
> 4. FACTS FACTS FACTS.. NO ONE, including myself, may cite an editorial
> or journalists impression or opinion. Only facts may be cited here.
> You may cite first person works, quotes, position papers,
> investigations, and poles. Quotes, first person accounts and so on
> must be from some one who was in a position to witness, affect, or
> investigate a topic, ie you can cite the Federalist papers or a
> Supreme Court decision if the topic is American law, but not the NY
> times editorial comment on that decision.
>
> 5. Anyone who fails to obey these rules will be asked to leave. To
> make it fair, I will offer this to Draco_Artie, He / she and I will
> need to both be in agreement that a poster is violating the rules, if
> the two of us disagree, the poster will be given a warning BY BOTH OF
> US, and if similar posts with the same theme, ie questionable
> material, are given, then the poster will be asked to leave.
>
> Rat o Artie, the Ring is open, you are free to decline this offer if
> you like, if you would like to accept the invitation, you are also
> free to amend the rules.
>
> Regarding the rules, I would like to add, may it be kept at 3 rounds,
> in the following order:
>
> 1. Main thesis: presentation and argument;
>
> 2. Rebuttal and inclusion of new arguments (and facts);
>
> 3. Rebuttal and conclusion (no new facts may be introduced).
>
> A note on facts: they have to be backed by sources. I agree short
> quotes can be included along with links.
>
> The King of the RING..



--
alt.usenet.kooks - Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker:
September 2005 and April 2006

"K-Man's particular genius, however, lies not merely in his humour,
but his ability to make posters who had previously seemed reasonably
well-balanced turn into foaming, frothing, death threat-uttering
maniacs" - Snarky, Demon Lord of Confusion

Thou toad-spotted dog-fox not proved worth a blackberry. Thou doghearted
flinty tartar.