Rhonda Lea Kirk <rhondalea@gmail.com>, the street entertainer who sings
ballads, banged out:

> Kadaitcha Man wrote:
>> Rhonda Lea Kirk <rhondalea@gmail.com>, the sheep and wool smuggler,
>> purred:
>>
>>> Kadaitcha Man wrote:
>>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk <rhondalea@gmail.com>, the grovelling flutist,
>>>> gabbled:
>>>>
>>>>> Kadaitcha Man wrote:
>>>>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk <rhondalea@gmail.com>, the worker of the fish
>>>>>> trap, rued:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Wed, 4 Oct 2006 22:40:38 -0400, "Rhonda Lea Kirk"
>>>>>>>> <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 4 Oct 2006 20:44:26 -0400, "Rhonda Lea Kirk"
>>>>>>>>>> <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 04:47:42 GMT, The Demon Prince of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Absurdity <absurd_number_of_nicks@hell.corn> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 03:23:47 +0000, Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ did
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the cha-cha,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and screamed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 02:47:18 GMT, The Demon Prince of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Absurdity wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 01:32:20 +0000, Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> did the cha-cha,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and screamed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 01:11:35 GMT, The Demon Prince of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Absurdity wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 21:50:20 +0000, Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> did the cha-cha, and screamed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 03:15:20 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk, the trench and ditch digger,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dilated:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha Man wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Grand Moff Robert Buchanan, the chuck-full
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marshal, bull****ted:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:ih34i2tu8faa53sikbb7dstsrd062pi7bg@4ax.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 07:11:04 GMT, Grand Moff
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Robert Buchanan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:q424i299r43pu7ra0hdn3o1n4ag0kpu0at@4ax.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:48:06 GMT, Grand Moff
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Robert Buchanan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:3614i2p71j9pghflcb227a6vt1cp7af7so@4ax.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:33:36 GMT, Grand
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Moff Robert Buchanan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:6ov3i21sc8ofnn6pjc983461jfl7f90g16@4ax.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:05:29 GMT, Grand
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Moff Robert Buchanan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:c4k3i2pjhinlqtqphs8gjg8k5qodhf4uce@4ax.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del ¤:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 05:35:02 +0545,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Kadaitcha Man" wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤, the person who loans
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> money and takes an arm or a leg as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interest payment, brown-nosed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A thread chock full of trolls
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> telling a new poster stupid **** and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generally acting like *******s.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing about that is unusual at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all, only ironic.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The ironic part is that so many
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hypocrites could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> congregate so quickly all in one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thread.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A lot of you are the same silly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *******s who were just telling some
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> idiotic, long lost, wayfaring,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> coming back to the fold looking for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> old Usenet buddies, sentimental sap
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that I was a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> troll for calling him a dumb ass and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asking him to go away.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I bet everyone of you are as stupid
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as you look.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The real irony is that you're sitting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the sewer, complaining about the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stench, utterly oblivious that you're
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adding to it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Add to that the irony of a poster such
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as yourself
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that most think of as a monosyllabic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> twit who vomits foul language as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> easily as a bum wipes his ass with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> his clean hand and the amount of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> irony is astounding.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A few points that I should address:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Twits are not, in and of themselves,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> monosyllabic.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However, the words they speak may be.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It appears that somebody owns you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This particular strand of this thread was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> initiated by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> me, about him.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That does not surprise me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now, show me something a little more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bizarre than his name being mentioned when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> he is the one being discussed, GrandMoff.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oops, that's twice I have typed your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> moniker in 2 different posts,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's my title, not my moniker. And
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there's a space between "Grand" and "Moff."
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BTW, can you ever get anything right?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I prefer GrandMoff, are you stating for the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> record that you disapprove of GrandMoff?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, I don't mind if you make an ass of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yourself.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> By eliminating one space you have determined
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that I am making an ass of myself?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, yeah. Duh.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You really are the testy one.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BTW, it is your moniker,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You can't distinguish the difference between
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a title and a moniker. Ha, ha!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure I can, GrandMoffRobertBuchanan is your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> moniker, it makes little difference if your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> given name is at the end of it, this is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Usenet, idiot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for making as little sense as possible
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with that response.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can provide you with a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> definition of moniker if you would like for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> me to do that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only if the definition is taken from a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> legitimate source,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> such a a dictionary. Do you know what a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dictionary is?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hmmm, let's see:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -------------------------------------- moniker
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dictionary
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Directory > Words > Dictionary
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mon·i·ker or mon·ick·er (mon'i-k?r) n. Slang.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A personal name or nickname.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now, I would tell you from what dictionary I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> obtained this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> definition, GrandMoff, but I would prefer you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to ask me politely. Show that you have manners
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will share the knowledge.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't care. My dictionary has the same
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> definition. Now look up the definition for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "title," note the difference, and wallow in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shame of your own ignorance.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you may be onto
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something, but I highly doubt it, you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't seem to be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that swuft.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can't help it if you're obsessed with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> him, you spastic thing, you!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> With who? What the **** are you babbling on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was referring to your freakish obsession
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with KM. Your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> attention span is terrible!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> KM? Who in the holy ****ing hell is KM? You
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are one of those Usenet freaks everyone warns
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> others about, aren't you?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're not even familiar with the acronym that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've applied
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the object of your desire? You're a mess!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I see you've met yet another one from my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collection of k0oKs. Enjoy.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think I own a share of Altimer, dear.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes dear, I know; what's mine is yours and what's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yours is yours.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I already have Rhonda's mind right, Kadaitcha, now
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there is just you. She crumbles easily, not much
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fight in her. You have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> retard strength to you though, a little tougher.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Poor old Rhonda just goes around bleating and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> whining about how
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am mean and not worth responding to because I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> drone on. LOL
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The thing is, that is what I wanted to do,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> methodically break her spirit and in doing so, win
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the game of attrition. Which I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> did, she as much as groveled at my feet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here's hoping this ain't too late, and that I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> haven't already nominated anyone for it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> George Armstrong Custer "Kicked @$$" Award
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Given to those brave, inspiring crusaders who will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> keep up a lost lunatic cause despite all odds, even
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> after the enemy has won, set up their own superpower
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in their midst and are chugging
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Guinness in a Kook-free world scenario.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's good, Demon, keep repeating that mantra and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eventually your perception may actually become
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> someone's reality. Otherwise, you are grasping at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> straws, there clearly is no ass kicking going on, on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> either side, really.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Isn't there a clause in the rules that says something
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like: just because a poster is slamming your head
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> against the wall over and over doesn't mean that he
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or she shall be granted an award? Reread the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> guidebook. Do not abuse your nominating power, it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will lose all value.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Awww, that's okay, I haven't replied to you enough, of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> late, to properly apply such a beating to you -- Eris
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> knows you've never done so to anyone. Your k00ky
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> k'lames of victory (and ownership of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> K-Man), however, are a sure sign of eligibility for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this award, which, alas, shall be for October.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, in other words, you are rock stupid and this is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just how you operate? Over-exaggerated claims of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ownership do not make it so. Example: Kadaitcha claims
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> over and over in every post that I am owned. He only
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does this when he runs out of bull**** to reply with. But,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> again, it just doesn't make it true. There has
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be undeniable proof, I know the rules, *****.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bloviation to avoid admitting a ****-up noted. You made
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the k'lame of ownership.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You are simply sidestepping the base issue of dubious
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> claimants of ownership. In order to play this game that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you want to play, I will require "at least" one statement
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by myself that I owned anyone. You will have to provide
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this statement, supposedly made by myself, with full
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> headers. Otherwise, you are standing on shaky ground.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Altie
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here's one. I have to go back and dig out the rest, but if
>>>>>>>>>>>>> you continue to dispute your nomination, I'll be happy to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> do it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I believe you've claimed ownership of Mr. Plow and me, as
>>>>>>>>>>>>> well.
>>>>>>>>>>> <begin proof>
>>>>>>>>>>>> X-Gerbil-Hamster-Info: Score=0 ScoreLoad=0 ScoreSave=0
>>>>>>>>>>>> Received=20061003040805
>>>>>>>>>>>> Xref: localhost 24hoursupport.helpdesk:7520
>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.comp.anti-virus:2193 alt.comp.os.windows-xp:764
>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.comp.virus:2266 alt.os.windows-xp:3283
>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.privacy.spyware:1588 alt.usenet.kooks:15236
>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.windows-xp:983 Path:
>>>>>>>>>>>> blackhelicopter.databasix.com!news.glorb.com!newsh ub.sdsu.edu!elnk-nf2-pas!newsfeed.earthlink.net!stamper.news.pas.earthl ink.net!newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net.POSTED!70 9dc226!not-for-mail
>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ <Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Newsgroups:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 24hoursupport.helpdesk,alt.comp.anti-virus,alt.comp.os.windows-xp,alt.comp.virus,alt.os.windows-xp,alt.privacy.spyware,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.window s-xp
>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Tell me about this newsgroup
>>>>>>>>>>>> Keywords: Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤
>>>>>>>>>>>> Summary: Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sender: Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@cad.com
>>>>>>>>>>>> Organization: Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤
>>>>>>>>>>>> Reply-To: Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com
>>>>>>>>>>>> Expires: Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤
>>>>>>>>>>>> Message-ID: <4964i2hr36kc4picaguliodngc5rthdnhk@4ax.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> References:
>>>>>>>>>>>> <Xns985112546E913grandmoffdeathstarga@66.133.129.7 1>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <q424i299r43pu7ra0hdn3o1n4ag0kpu0at@4ax.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <Xns98511638E3E9Bgrandmoffdeathstarga@66.133.129.7 1>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <ih34i2tu8faa53sikbb7dstsrd062pi7bg@4ax.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <Xns98511A94F197grandmoffdeathstarga@66.133.129.71 >
>>>>>>>>>>>> <5tbw95$zvs$o@wretched-pendulums.com> X-Newsreader: Forte
>>>>>>>>>>>> Agent
>>>>>>>>>>>> 4.0/32.1071
>>>>>>>>>>>> X-No-Archive: yes
>>>>>>>>>>>> MIME-Version: 1.0
>>>>>>>>>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>>>>>>>>>>>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>>>>>>>>>>>> Lines: 185
>>>>>>>>>>>> Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 08:06:55 GMT
>>>>>>>>>>>> NNTP-Posting-Host: 4.88.79.124
>>>>>>>>>>>> X-Complaints-To: abuse@earthlink.net
>>>>>>>>>>>> X-Trace: newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net 1159862815
>>>>>>>>>>>> 4.88.79.124 (Tue, 03 Oct 2006 01:06:55 PDT)
>>>>>>>>>>>> NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 01:06:55 PDT
>>>>>>>>>>>> X-Old-Xref: blackhelicopter.databasix.com
>>>>>>>>>>>> 24hoursupport.helpdesk:100333 alt.comp.anti-virus:12570
>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.comp.os.windows-xp:4122 alt.comp.virus:9334
>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.os.windows-xp:27393 alt.privacy.spyware:10965
>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.usenet.kooks:199914 alt.windows-xp:8362
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 13:37:20 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man"
>>>>>>>>>>>> <****-you.ya.****@kiss-my-big-black-ass.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Grand Moff Robert Buchanan
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <grandmoff@deathstar.galacticempire>, the chuck-full
>>>>>>>>>>>>> marshal, bull****ted:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:ih34i2tu8faa53sikbb7dstsrd062pi7bg@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ <Ctrl ¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 07:11:04 GMT, Grand Moff Robert
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Buchanan <grandmoff@deathstar.galacticempire> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:q424i299r43pu7ra0hdn3o1n4ag0kpu0at@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ <Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:48:06 GMT, Grand Moff Robert
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Buchanan <grandmoff@deathstar.galacticempire> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:3614i2p71j9pghflcb227a6vt1cp7af7so@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:33:36 GMT, Grand Moff Robert
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Buchanan <grandmoff@deathstar.galacticempire> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:6ov3i21sc8ofnn6pjc983461jfl7f90g16@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ <Ctrl ¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:05:29 GMT, Grand Moff
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Robert Buchanan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <grandmoff@deathstar.galacticempire> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:c4k3i2pjhinlqtqphs8gjg8k5qodhf4uce@4ax.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del ¤ <Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 05:35:02 +0545, "Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Man"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <****-you.ya.****@kiss-my-big-black-ass.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ <Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>, the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> person who loans money and takes an arm or a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> leg as interest payment, brown-nosed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A thread chock full of trolls telling a new
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> poster stupid **** and generally acting like
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *******s.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing about that is unusual at all, only
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ironic.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The ironic part is that so many hypocrites
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could congregate so quickly all in one thread.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A lot of you are the same silly *******s who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were just telling some idiotic, long lost,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wayfaring, coming back to the fold looking for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> old Usenet buddies, sentimental sap that I was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a troll for calling him a dumb ass and asking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> him to go away. I bet everyone of you are as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stupid as you look.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The real irony is that you're sitting in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sewer, complaining about the stench, utterly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oblivious that you're adding to it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Add to that the irony of a poster such as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yourself that most think of as a monosyllabic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> twit who vomits foul language as easily as a bum
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wipes his ass with his clean hand and the amount
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of irony is astounding.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A few points that I should address:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Twits are not, in and of themselves,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> monosyllabic. However, the words they speak may
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It appears that somebody owns you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This particular strand of this thread was initiated
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by me, about him.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That does not surprise me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now, show me something a little more bizarre than
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> his name being mentioned when he is the one being
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> discussed, GrandMoff. Oops, that's twice I have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> typed your moniker in 2 different posts,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's my title, not my moniker. And there's a space
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> between "Grand" and "Moff." BTW, can you ever get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anything right?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I prefer GrandMoff, are you stating for the record
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that you disapprove of GrandMoff?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, I don't mind if you make an ass of yourself.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> By eliminating one space you have determined that I am
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> making an ass of myself?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, yeah. Duh.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You really are the testy one.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BTW, it is your moniker,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You can't distinguish the difference between a title
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and a moniker. Ha, ha!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure I can, GrandMoffRobertBuchanan is your moniker, it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> makes little difference if your given name is at the end
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of it, this is Usenet, idiot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for making as little sense as possible with that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> response.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can provide you with a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> definition of moniker if you would like for me to do
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only if the definition is taken from a legitimate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> source, such a a dictionary. Do you know what a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dictionary is?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hmmm, let's see:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> moniker
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dictionary
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Directory > Words > Dictionary
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mon·i·ker or mon·ick·er (mon'i-k?r)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> n. Slang.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A personal name or nickname.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now, I would tell you from what dictionary I obtained
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this definition, GrandMoff, but I would prefer you to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ask me politely. Show that you have manners and I will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> share the knowledge.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't care. My dictionary has the same definition. Now
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> look up the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> definition for "title," note the difference, and wallow
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the shame of your own ignorance.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you may be onto
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something, but I highly doubt it, you don't seem to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be that swuft.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can't help it if you're obsessed with him, you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> spastic thing, you!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> With who? What the **** are you babbling on about?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was referring to your freakish obsession with KM.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your attention span is terrible!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> KM? Who in the holy ****ing hell is KM? You are one of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those Usenet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> freaks everyone warns others about, aren't you?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're not even familiar with the acronym that I've
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> applied to the object of your desire? You're a mess!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I see you've met yet another one from my collection of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> k0oKs. Enjoy.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha, you are my kook. Remember, you ran off last
>>>>>>>>>>>> time we had a little sparring session. I hurt your monkey
>>>>>>>>>>>> like feelings and you got mad and went away.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Tonight, you just had to reacquaint yourself with me for
>>>>>>>>>>>> some reason, I don't know why. But, it will end just the
>>>>>>>>>>>> same as last time, me pissing you off and you getting mad
>>>>>>>>>>>> and not wanting to play anymore.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Altie
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> <end proof>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Rhonda, you are not as stupid as you pretend to be, no
>>>>>>>>>>>> ****ing way. All that bull**** you posted, trying to prove
>>>>>>>>>>>> that I have ever said I "owned" anyone, was for nothing.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Why was it for nothing? Because I didn't say it, dumb ass.
>>>>>>>>>>>> When you learn how to follow a thread and determine who is
>>>>>>>>>>>> typing what, re-post something that you may think I have
>>>>>>>>>>>> posted. Then, I will analyze it and help you out by
>>>>>>>>>>>> telling you if I really posted it or someone that was
>>>>>>>>>>>> replying to me did.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Example: the sentence above that says "It appears that
>>>>>>>>>>>> somebody owns you" was not written by me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Next, try again.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Altie
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Argument by snipping, Altie?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I restored the context for you. Don't thank me; it was my
>>>>>>>>>>> pleasure.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Rhonda, seriously, read what I am typing and try to absorb
>>>>>>>>>> it. You claim that I said I owned someone, right?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Then, I say that you should at least post some proof of that,
>>>>>>>>>> which you tried to do.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The problem is that this sentence:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "It appears that somebody owns you"
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> was not written by me.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> What exactly do you not understand, Rhonda? You mistakenly
>>>>>>>>>> believe that I posted that I owned someone. This is the
>>>>>>>>>> second time that I have pointed out to you that you are
>>>>>>>>>> incorrect.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If you like, I will try to present what I have said in a more
>>>>>>>>>> basic way if you really just don't understand. It will be
>>>>>>>>>> hard for me, I am not used to dealing with such stupendous
>>>>>>>>>> and thick skulled stupidity, but I will try.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Altie
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Altimer,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We seem to have a communication failure here.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Let me put it to you plainly.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In the post I quoted, you made the claim that a) Kadaitcha is
>>>>>>>>> a kook and b) that he is your kook.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In point of fact, the only kook in this thread is you,
>>>>>>>>> Altimer, and you are owned, jointly, by Chadwick, Mr. Plow and
>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha, among others.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And there we have it, straight from Rhonda's mouth to my
>>>>>>>> screen, excessive claims of ownage. Which award do you win? I
>>>>>>>> don't keep up with all that award bull****, just tell me
>>>>>>>> which one you should now be eligible to nominate yourself for,
>>>>>>>> Rhonda. Can you nominate yourself? Either way, I bet you could
>>>>>>>> win one.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Now will you please **** off and die?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No, Rhonda, I will not. You should know better than that. You
>>>>>>>> just keep right on along bopping around Usenet proclaiming who
>>>>>>>> you think owns others, like KingKook, and don't worry about me.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Y'know, Altie, I don't think I've ever claimed personal
>>>>>>> ownership of anyone.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> HURUMPH!!!
>>>>>
>>>>> That's different.
>>>>>
>>>>> My ownership of you has nothing to do with making you dance. Well,
>>>>> okay, nothing to do with making you dance on usenet. Mattress
>>>>> dancing doesn't count.
>>>>>
>>>>> And anyway, you own me back, so we're even.
>>>>
>>>> I need to be spanked now, Mistress.
>>>
>>> <sigh> Come and get it, honey.
>>
>> The plane leaves in about three hours.
>
> Unfortunately, you were not on it.
>
> <sigh> I really wish I weren't a ****ing adult, because if I were
> still a teenager (emotionally or otherwise), I'd just leave.
>
> But the consolation prize is that spring is my favorite season, and
> I'll get two of them next year.

I'll settle for just one. You are my spring.



--
alt.usenet.kooks - Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker:
September 2005 and April 2006

"K-Man's particular genius, however, lies not merely in his humour,
but his ability to make posters who had previously seemed reasonably
well-balanced turn into foaming, frothing, death threat-uttering
maniacs" - Snarky, Demon Lord of Confusion

Thou pinch-spotted malapert. Thou floor-licking discontent.