Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ <Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>, the tax collector, shrilled:

> On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 11:08:49 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man"
> <****-you.ya.****@kiss-my-big-black-ass.com> wrote:
>
>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ <Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>, the inside-out almsman,
>> groused:
>>
>>> On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 00:30:35 -0400, "Rhonda Lea Kirk"
>>> <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 4 Oct 2006 22:40:38 -0400, "Rhonda Lea Kirk"
>>>>> <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wed, 4 Oct 2006 20:44:26 -0400, "Rhonda Lea Kirk"
>>>>>>> <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 04:47:42 GMT, The Demon Prince of
>>>>>>>>>>> Absurdity <absurd_number_of_nicks@hell.corn> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 03:23:47 +0000, Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ did the
>>>>>>>>>>>> cha-cha,
>>>>>>>>>>>> and screamed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 02:47:18 GMT, The Demon Prince of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Absurdity wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 01:32:20 +0000, Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ did
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the cha-cha,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and screamed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 01:11:35 GMT, The Demon Prince of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Absurdity wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 21:50:20 +0000, Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ did
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the cha-cha, and screamed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 03:15:20 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk, the trench and ditch digger,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dilated:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha Man wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Grand Moff Robert Buchanan, the chuck-full marshal,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bull****ted:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:ih34i2tu8faa53sikbb7dstsrd062pi7bg@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 07:11:04 GMT, Grand Moff
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Robert Buchanan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:q424i299r43pu7ra0hdn3o1n4ag0kpu0at@4ax.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:48:06 GMT, Grand Moff
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Robert Buchanan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:3614i2p71j9pghflcb227a6vt1cp7af7so@4ax.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:33:36 GMT, Grand Moff
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Robert Buchanan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:6ov3i21sc8ofnn6pjc983461jfl7f90g16@4ax.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:05:29 GMT, Grand
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Moff Robert Buchanan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:c4k3i2pjhinlqtqphs8gjg8k5qodhf4uce@4ax.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del ¤:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 05:35:02 +0545,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Kadaitcha Man" wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤, the person who loans
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> money and takes an arm or a leg as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interest payment, brown-nosed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A thread chock full of trolls telling a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> new poster stupid **** and generally
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> acting like *******s.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing about that is unusual at all,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only ironic.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The ironic part is that so many
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hypocrites could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> congregate so quickly all in one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thread.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A lot of you are the same silly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *******s who were just telling some
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> idiotic, long lost, wayfaring, coming
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> back to the fold looking for old
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Usenet buddies, sentimental sap that I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> troll for calling him a dumb ass and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asking him to go away.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I bet everyone of you are as stupid as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you look.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The real irony is that you're sitting in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the sewer, complaining about the stench,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> utterly oblivious that you're adding to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Add to that the irony of a poster such as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yourself
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that most think of as a monosyllabic twit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who vomits foul language as easily as a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bum wipes his ass with his clean hand and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the amount of irony is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> astounding.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A few points that I should address:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Twits are not, in and of themselves,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> monosyllabic.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However, the words they speak may be.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It appears that somebody owns you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This particular strand of this thread was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> initiated by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> me, about him.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That does not surprise me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now, show me something a little more bizarre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than his name being mentioned when he is the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one being discussed, GrandMoff. Oops, that's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> twice I have typed your moniker in 2
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> different posts,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's my title, not my moniker. And there's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a space between "Grand" and "Moff." BTW, can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you ever get anything right?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I prefer GrandMoff, are you stating for the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> record that you disapprove of GrandMoff?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, I don't mind if you make an ass of yourself.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> By eliminating one space you have determined
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that I am making an ass of myself?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, yeah. Duh.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You really are the testy one.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BTW, it is your moniker,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You can't distinguish the difference between a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> title and a moniker. Ha, ha!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure I can, GrandMoffRobertBuchanan is your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> moniker, it makes little difference if your given
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> name is at the end of it, this is Usenet, idiot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for making as little sense as possible with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that response.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can provide you with a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> definition of moniker if you would like for me
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to do that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only if the definition is taken from a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> legitimate source,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> such a a dictionary. Do you know what a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dictionary is?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hmmm, let's see:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -------------------------------------- moniker
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dictionary
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Directory > Words > Dictionary
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mon·i·ker or mon·ick·er (mon'i-k?r) n. Slang.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A personal name or nickname.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now, I would tell you from what dictionary I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> obtained this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> definition, GrandMoff, but I would prefer you to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ask me politely. Show that you have manners and I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will share the knowledge.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't care. My dictionary has the same
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> definition. Now look up the definition for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "title," note the difference, and wallow in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shame of your own ignorance.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you may be onto
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something, but I highly doubt it, you don't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seem to be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that swuft.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can't help it if you're obsessed with him,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you spastic thing, you!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> With who? What the **** are you babbling on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was referring to your freakish obsession with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> KM. Your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> attention span is terrible!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> KM? Who in the holy ****ing hell is KM? You are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one of those Usenet freaks everyone warns others
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about, aren't you?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're not even familiar with the acronym that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've applied
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the object of your desire? You're a mess!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I see you've met yet another one from my collection
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of k0oKs. Enjoy.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think I own a share of Altimer, dear.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes dear, I know; what's mine is yours and what's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yours is yours.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I already have Rhonda's mind right, Kadaitcha, now
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there is just you. She crumbles easily, not much
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fight in her. You have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> retard strength to you though, a little tougher.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Poor old Rhonda just goes around bleating and whining
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about how
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am mean and not worth responding to because I drone
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on. LOL
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The thing is, that is what I wanted to do,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> methodically break her spirit and in doing so, win
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the game of attrition. Which I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> did, she as much as groveled at my feet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here's hoping this ain't too late, and that I haven't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already nominated anyone for it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> George Armstrong Custer "Kicked @$$" Award
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Given to those brave, inspiring crusaders who will keep
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up a lost lunatic cause despite all odds, even after
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the enemy has won, set up their own superpower in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their midst and are chugging
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Guinness in a Kook-free world scenario.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's good, Demon, keep repeating that mantra and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eventually your perception may actually become someone's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reality. Otherwise, you are grasping at straws, there
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clearly is no ass kicking going on, on either side,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> really.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Isn't there a clause in the rules that says something
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like: just because a poster is slamming your head
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> against the wall over and over doesn't mean that he or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> she shall be granted an award? Reread the guidebook. Do
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not abuse your nominating power, it will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lose all value.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Awww, that's okay, I haven't replied to you enough, of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> late, to properly apply such a beating to you -- Eris
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> knows you've never done so to anyone. Your k00ky k'lames
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of victory (and ownership of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> K-Man), however, are a sure sign of eligibility for this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> award, which, alas, shall be for October.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, in other words, you are rock stupid and this is just
>>>>>>>>>>>>> how you operate? Over-exaggerated claims of ownership do
>>>>>>>>>>>>> not make it so. Example: Kadaitcha claims over and over in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> every post that I am owned. He only does this when he runs
>>>>>>>>>>>>> out of bull**** to reply with. But, again, it just
>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't make it true. There has to be undeniable proof,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I know the rules, *****.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Bloviation to avoid admitting a ****-up noted. You made the
>>>>>>>>>>>> k'lame of ownership.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You are simply sidestepping the base issue of dubious
>>>>>>>>>>> claimants of ownership. In order to play this game that you
>>>>>>>>>>> want to play, I will require "at least" one statement by
>>>>>>>>>>> myself that I owned anyone. You will have to provide this
>>>>>>>>>>> statement, supposedly made by myself, with full headers.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Otherwise, you are standing on shaky ground.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Altie
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Here's one. I have to go back and dig out the rest, but if
>>>>>>>>>> you continue to dispute your nomination, I'll be happy to do
>>>>>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I believe you've claimed ownership of Mr. Plow and me, as
>>>>>>>>>> well.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <begin proof>
>>>>>>>>> X-Gerbil-Hamster-Info: Score=0 ScoreLoad=0 ScoreSave=0
>>>>>>>>> Received=20061003040805
>>>>>>>>> Xref: localhost 24hoursupport.helpdesk:7520
>>>>>>>>> alt.comp.anti-virus:2193 alt.comp.os.windows-xp:764
>>>>>>>>> alt.comp.virus:2266 alt.os.windows-xp:3283
>>>>>>>>> alt.privacy.spyware:1588 alt.usenet.kooks:15236
>>>>>>>>> alt.windows-xp:983 Path:
>>>>>>>>> blackhelicopter.databasix.com!news.glorb.com!newsh ub.sdsu.edu!elnk-nf2-pas!newsfeed.earthlink.net!stamper.news.pas.earthl ink.net!newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net.POSTED!70 9dc226!not-for-mail
>>>>>>>>> From: Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ <Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>
>>>>>>>>> Newsgroups:
>>>>>>>>> 24hoursupport.helpdesk,alt.comp.anti-virus,alt.comp.os.windows-xp,alt.comp.virus,alt.os.windows-xp,alt.privacy.spyware,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.window s-xp
>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Tell me about this newsgroup
>>>>>>>>> Keywords: Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤
>>>>>>>>> Summary: Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤
>>>>>>>>> Sender: Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@cad.com
>>>>>>>>> Organization: Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤
>>>>>>>>> Reply-To: Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com
>>>>>>>>> Expires: Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤
>>>>>>>>> Message-ID: <4964i2hr36kc4picaguliodngc5rthdnhk@4ax.com>
>>>>>>>>> References:
>>>>>>>>> <Xns985112546E913grandmoffdeathstarga@66.133.129.7 1>
>>>>>>>>> <q424i299r43pu7ra0hdn3o1n4ag0kpu0at@4ax.com>
>>>>>>>>> <Xns98511638E3E9Bgrandmoffdeathstarga@66.133.129.7 1>
>>>>>>>>> <ih34i2tu8faa53sikbb7dstsrd062pi7bg@4ax.com>
>>>>>>>>> <Xns98511A94F197grandmoffdeathstarga@66.133.129.71 >
>>>>>>>>> <5tbw95$zvs$o@wretched-pendulums.com>
>>>>>>>>> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.0/32.1071
>>>>>>>>> X-No-Archive: yes
>>>>>>>>> MIME-Version: 1.0
>>>>>>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>>>>>>>>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>>>>>>>>> Lines: 185
>>>>>>>>> Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 08:06:55 GMT
>>>>>>>>> NNTP-Posting-Host: 4.88.79.124
>>>>>>>>> X-Complaints-To: abuse@earthlink.net
>>>>>>>>> X-Trace: newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net 1159862815
>>>>>>>>> 4.88.79.124 (Tue, 03 Oct 2006 01:06:55 PDT)
>>>>>>>>> NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 01:06:55 PDT
>>>>>>>>> X-Old-Xref: blackhelicopter.databasix.com
>>>>>>>>> 24hoursupport.helpdesk:100333 alt.comp.anti-virus:12570
>>>>>>>>> alt.comp.os.windows-xp:4122 alt.comp.virus:9334
>>>>>>>>> alt.os.windows-xp:27393 alt.privacy.spyware:10965
>>>>>>>>> alt.usenet.kooks:199914 alt.windows-xp:8362
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 13:37:20 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man"
>>>>>>>>> <****-you.ya.****@kiss-my-big-black-ass.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Grand Moff Robert Buchanan
>>>>>>>>>> <grandmoff@deathstar.galacticempire>, the chuck-full marshal,
>>>>>>>>>> bull****ted:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>> news:ih34i2tu8faa53sikbb7dstsrd062pi7bg@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ <Ctrl ¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 07:11:04 GMT, Grand Moff Robert
>>>>>>>>>>>> Buchanan <grandmoff@deathstar.galacticempire> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:q424i299r43pu7ra0hdn3o1n4ag0kpu0at@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ <Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:48:06 GMT, Grand Moff Robert
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Buchanan <grandmoff@deathstar.galacticempire> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:3614i2p71j9pghflcb227a6vt1cp7af7so@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:33:36 GMT, Grand Moff Robert
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Buchanan <grandmoff@deathstar.galacticempire> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:6ov3i21sc8ofnn6pjc983461jfl7f90g16@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ <Ctrl ¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:05:29 GMT, Grand Moff Robert
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Buchanan <grandmoff@deathstar.galacticempire> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:c4k3i2pjhinlqtqphs8gjg8k5qodhf4uce@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del ¤ <Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 05:35:02 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <****-you.ya.****@kiss-my-big-black-ass.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ <Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>, the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> person who loans money and takes an arm or a leg
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as interest payment, brown-nosed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A thread chock full of trolls telling a new
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> poster stupid **** and generally acting like
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *******s.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing about that is unusual at all, only
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ironic.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The ironic part is that so many hypocrites could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> congregate so quickly all in one thread.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A lot of you are the same silly *******s who were
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just telling some idiotic, long lost, wayfaring,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> coming back to the fold looking for old Usenet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> buddies, sentimental sap that I was a troll for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> calling him a dumb ass and asking him to go away.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I bet everyone of you are as stupid as you look.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The real irony is that you're sitting in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sewer, complaining about the stench, utterly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oblivious that you're adding to it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Add to that the irony of a poster such as yourself
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that most think of as a monosyllabic twit who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vomits foul language as easily as a bum wipes his
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ass with his clean hand and the amount of irony is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> astounding.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A few points that I should address:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Twits are not, in and of themselves, monosyllabic.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However, the words they speak may be.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It appears that somebody owns you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This particular strand of this thread was initiated by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> me, about him.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That does not surprise me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now, show me something a little more bizarre than his
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> name being mentioned when he is the one being
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> discussed, GrandMoff. Oops, that's twice I have typed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your moniker in 2 different posts,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's my title, not my moniker. And there's a space
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> between "Grand" and "Moff." BTW, can you ever get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anything right?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I prefer GrandMoff, are you stating for the record that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you disapprove of GrandMoff?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, I don't mind if you make an ass of yourself.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> By eliminating one space you have determined that I am
>>>>>>>>>>>> making an ass of myself?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Well, yeah. Duh.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You really are the testy one.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BTW, it is your moniker,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You can't distinguish the difference between a title and a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> moniker. Ha, ha!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure I can, GrandMoffRobertBuchanan is your moniker, it
>>>>>>>>>>>> makes little difference if your given name is at the end
>>>>>>>>>>>> of it, this is Usenet, idiot.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for making as little sense as possible with that
>>>>>>>>>>> response.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can provide you with a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> definition of moniker if you would like for me to do
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only if the definition is taken from a legitimate source,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> such a a dictionary. Do you know what a dictionary is?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hmmm, let's see:
>>>>>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>> moniker
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Dictionary
>>>>>>>>>>>> Directory > Words > Dictionary
>>>>>>>>>>>> mon·i·ker or mon·ick·er (mon'i-k?r)
>>>>>>>>>>>> n. Slang.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> A personal name or nickname.
>>>>>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Now, I would tell you from what dictionary I obtained this
>>>>>>>>>>>> definition, GrandMoff, but I would prefer you to ask me
>>>>>>>>>>>> politely. Show that you have manners and I will share the
>>>>>>>>>>>> knowledge.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I don't care. My dictionary has the same definition. Now
>>>>>>>>>>> look up the
>>>>>>>>>>> definition for "title," note the difference, and wallow in
>>>>>>>>>>> the shame of your own ignorance.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you may be onto
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something, but I highly doubt it, you don't seem to be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that swuft.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can't help it if you're obsessed with him, you spastic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thing, you!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> With who? What the **** are you babbling on about?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was referring to your freakish obsession with KM. Your
>>>>>>>>>>>>> attention span is terrible!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> KM? Who in the holy ****ing hell is KM? You are one of
>>>>>>>>>>>> those Usenet
>>>>>>>>>>>> freaks everyone warns others about, aren't you?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You're not even familiar with the acronym that I've applied
>>>>>>>>>>> to the object of your desire? You're a mess!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I see you've met yet another one from my collection of k0oKs.
>>>>>>>>>> Enjoy.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha, you are my kook. Remember, you ran off last time
>>>>>>>>> we had a little sparring session. I hurt your monkey like
>>>>>>>>> feelings and you got mad and went away.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Tonight, you just had to reacquaint yourself with me for some
>>>>>>>>> reason, I don't know why. But, it will end just the same as
>>>>>>>>> last time, me pissing you off and you getting mad and not
>>>>>>>>> wanting to play anymore.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Altie
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <end proof>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Rhonda, you are not as stupid as you pretend to be, no ****ing
>>>>>>>>> way. All that bull**** you posted, trying to prove that I have
>>>>>>>>> ever said I "owned" anyone, was for nothing.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Why was it for nothing? Because I didn't say it, dumb ass.
>>>>>>>>> When you learn how to follow a thread and determine who is
>>>>>>>>> typing what, re-post something that you may think I have
>>>>>>>>> posted. Then, I will analyze it and help you out by telling
>>>>>>>>> you if I really posted it or someone that was replying to me
>>>>>>>>> did.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Example: the sentence above that says "It appears that
>>>>>>>>> somebody owns you" was not written by me.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Next, try again.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Altie
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Argument by snipping, Altie?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I restored the context for you. Don't thank me; it was my
>>>>>>>> pleasure.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Rhonda, seriously, read what I am typing and try to absorb it.
>>>>>>> You claim that I said I owned someone, right?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Then, I say that you should at least post some proof of that,
>>>>>>> which you tried to do.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The problem is that this sentence:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "It appears that somebody owns you"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> was not written by me.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What exactly do you not understand, Rhonda? You mistakenly
>>>>>>> believe that I posted that I owned someone. This is the second
>>>>>>> time that I have pointed out to you that you are incorrect.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you like, I will try to present what I have said in a more
>>>>>>> basic way if you really just don't understand. It will be hard
>>>>>>> for me, I am not used to dealing with such stupendous and thick
>>>>>>> skulled stupidity, but I will try.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Altie
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Altimer,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We seem to have a communication failure here.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Let me put it to you plainly.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In the post I quoted, you made the claim that a) Kadaitcha is a
>>>>>> kook and b) that he is your kook.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In point of fact, the only kook in this thread is you, Altimer,
>>>>>> and you are owned, jointly, by Chadwick, Mr. Plow and Kadaitcha,
>>>>>> among others.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> And there we have it, straight from Rhonda's mouth to my screen,
>>>>> excessive claims of ownage. Which award do you win? I don't keep
>>>>> up with all that award bull****, just tell me which one you should
>>>>> now be eligible to nominate yourself for, Rhonda. Can you nominate
>>>>> yourself? Either way, I bet you could win one.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now will you please **** off and die?
>>>>>
>>>>> No, Rhonda, I will not. You should know better than that. You
>>>>> just keep right on along bopping around Usenet proclaiming who
>>>>> you think owns others, like KingKook, and don't worry about me.
>>>>
>>>> Y'know, Altie, I don't think I've ever claimed personal ownership
>>>> of anyone.
>>>
>>> Oh, so on a technicality you rest your case? You feel it is your
>>> kook duty to identify who is owned by who, but as long as you don't
>>> actually say that you own someone, you are in the clear.
>
>>> Wrong, you are still guilty of excessively claiming ownership with
>>> no backing to your dubious claims.
>>
>> Real meaning: "WAAAAAAAAAHWAAAAAH WAAAAAAH!"
>
> That's right Kadaitcha

Your admission is noted.



--
alt.usenet.kooks - Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker:
September 2005 and April 2006

"K-Man's particular genius, however, lies not merely in his humour,
but his ability to make posters who had previously seemed reasonably
well-balanced turn into foaming, frothing, death threat-uttering
maniacs" - Snarky, Demon Lord of Confusion

Thou horse trader. Thou unjust servingman.