Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Oct 2006 20:44:26 -0400, "Rhonda Lea Kirk"
> <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ wrote:
>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 04:47:42 GMT, The Demon Prince of Absurdity
>>>>> <absurd_number_of_nicks@hell.corn> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 03:23:47 +0000, Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ did the
>>>>>> cha-cha,
>>>>>> and screamed:
>>>>>>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 02:47:18 GMT, The Demon Prince of Absurdity
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 01:32:20 +0000, Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ did the
>>>>>>>> cha-cha,
>>>>>>>> and screamed:
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 01:11:35 GMT, The Demon Prince of
>>>>>>>>> Absurdity wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 21:50:20 +0000, Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ did the
>>>>>>>>>> cha-cha, and screamed:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 03:15:20 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man" wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk, the trench and ditch digger, dilated:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha Man wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Grand Moff Robert Buchanan, the chuck-full marshal,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bull****ted:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:ih34i2tu8faa53sikbb7dstsrd062pi7bg@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 07:11:04 GMT, Grand Moff Robert
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Buchanan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:q424i299r43pu7ra0hdn3o1n4ag0kpu0at@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:48:06 GMT, Grand Moff Robert
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Buchanan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:3614i2p71j9pghflcb227a6vt1cp7af7so@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:33:36 GMT, Grand Moff Robert
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Buchanan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:6ov3i21sc8ofnn6pjc983461jfl7f90g16@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:05:29 GMT, Grand Moff
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Robert Buchanan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:c4k3i2pjhinlqtqphs8gjg8k5qodhf4uce@4ax.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del ¤:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 05:35:02 +0545, "Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Man" wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤, the person who loans money
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and takes an arm or a leg as interest payment,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> brown-nosed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A thread chock full of trolls telling a new
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> poster stupid **** and generally acting like
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *******s.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing about that is unusual at all, only
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ironic.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The ironic part is that so many hypocrites
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> congregate so quickly all in one thread.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A lot of you are the same silly *******s who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were just telling some idiotic, long lost,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wayfaring, coming back to the fold looking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for old Usenet buddies, sentimental sap that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> troll for calling him a dumb ass and asking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> him to go away.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I bet everyone of you are as stupid as you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> look.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The real irony is that you're sitting in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sewer, complaining about the stench, utterly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oblivious that you're adding to it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Add to that the irony of a poster such as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yourself
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that most think of as a monosyllabic twit who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vomits foul language as easily as a bum wipes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> his ass with his clean hand and the amount of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> irony is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> astounding.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A few points that I should address:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Twits are not, in and of themselves,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> monosyllabic.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However, the words they speak may be.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It appears that somebody owns you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This particular strand of this thread was initiated
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> me, about him.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That does not surprise me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now, show me something a little more bizarre than
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> his name being mentioned when he is the one being
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> discussed, GrandMoff. Oops, that's twice I have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> typed your moniker in 2 different posts,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's my title, not my moniker. And there's a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> space between "Grand" and "Moff." BTW, can you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ever get anything right?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I prefer GrandMoff, are you stating for the record
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that you disapprove of GrandMoff?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, I don't mind if you make an ass of yourself.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> By eliminating one space you have determined that I am
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> making an ass of myself?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, yeah. Duh.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You really are the testy one.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BTW, it is your moniker,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You can't distinguish the difference between a title
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and a moniker. Ha, ha!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure I can, GrandMoffRobertBuchanan is your moniker, it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> makes little difference if your given name is at the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> end of it, this is Usenet, idiot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for making as little sense as possible with that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> response.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can provide you with a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> definition of moniker if you would like for me to do
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only if the definition is taken from a legitimate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> source,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> such a a dictionary. Do you know what a dictionary
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hmmm, let's see:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -------------------------------------- moniker
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dictionary
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Directory > Words > Dictionary
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mon·i·ker or mon·ick·er (mon'i-k?r) n. Slang.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A personal name or nickname.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now, I would tell you from what dictionary I obtained
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> definition, GrandMoff, but I would prefer you to ask me
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> politely. Show that you have manners and I will share
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the knowledge.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't care. My dictionary has the same definition.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now look up the definition for "title," note the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> difference, and wallow in the shame of your own
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignorance.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you may be onto
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something, but I highly doubt it, you don't seem to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that swuft.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can't help it if you're obsessed with him, you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> spastic thing, you!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> With who? What the **** are you babbling on about?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was referring to your freakish obsession with KM.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> attention span is terrible!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> KM? Who in the holy ****ing hell is KM? You are one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of those Usenet freaks everyone warns others about,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aren't you?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're not even familiar with the acronym that I've
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> applied
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the object of your desire? You're a mess!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I see you've met yet another one from my collection of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> k0oKs. Enjoy.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think I own a share of Altimer, dear.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes dear, I know; what's mine is yours and what's yours is
>>>>>>>>>>>> yours.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I already have Rhonda's mind right, Kadaitcha, now there is
>>>>>>>>>>> just you. She crumbles easily, not much fight in her. You
>>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>>> retard strength to you though, a little tougher.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Poor old Rhonda just goes around bleating and whining about
>>>>>>>>>>> how
>>>>>>>>>>> I am mean and not worth responding to because I drone on.
>>>>>>>>>>> LOL
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The thing is, that is what I wanted to do, methodically
>>>>>>>>>>> break her spirit and in doing so, win the game of
>>>>>>>>>>> attrition. Which I
>>>>>>>>>>> did, she as much as groveled at my feet.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Here's hoping this ain't too late, and that I haven't already
>>>>>>>>>> nominated anyone for it.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> George Armstrong Custer "Kicked @$$" Award
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Given to those brave, inspiring crusaders who will keep up a
>>>>>>>>>> lost lunatic cause despite all odds, even after the enemy has
>>>>>>>>>> won, set up their own superpower in their midst and are
>>>>>>>>>> chugging
>>>>>>>>>> Guinness in a Kook-free world scenario.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That's good, Demon, keep repeating that mantra and eventually
>>>>>>>>> your perception may actually become someone's reality.
>>>>>>>>> Otherwise, you are grasping at straws, there clearly is no ass
>>>>>>>>> kicking going on, on either side, really.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Isn't there a clause in the rules that says something like:
>>>>>>>>> just because a poster is slamming your head against the wall
>>>>>>>>> over and over doesn't mean that he or she shall be granted an
>>>>>>>>> award? Reread the guidebook. Do not abuse your nominating
>>>>>>>>> power, it will
>>>>>>>>> lose all value.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Awww, that's okay, I haven't replied to you enough, of late, to
>>>>>>>> properly apply such a beating to you -- Eris knows you've never
>>>>>>>> done so to anyone. Your k00ky k'lames of victory (and ownership
>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>> K-Man), however, are a sure sign of eligibility for this award,
>>>>>>>> which, alas, shall be for October.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So, in other words, you are rock stupid and this is just how you
>>>>>>> operate? Over-exaggerated claims of ownership do not make it so.
>>>>>>> Example: Kadaitcha claims over and over in every post that I am
>>>>>>> owned. He only does this when he runs out of bull**** to reply
>>>>>>> with. But, again, it just doesn't make it true. There has to
>>>>>>> be undeniable proof, I know the rules, *****.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bloviation to avoid admitting a ****-up noted. You made the
>>>>>> k'lame of ownership.
>>>>>
>>>>> You are simply sidestepping the base issue of dubious claimants of
>>>>> ownership. In order to play this game that you want to play, I
>>>>> will require "at least" one statement by myself that I owned
>>>>> anyone. You will have to provide this statement, supposedly made
>>>>> by myself, with full headers.
>>>>>
>>>>> Otherwise, you are standing on shaky ground.
>>>>>
>>>>> Altie
>>>>
>>>> Here's one. I have to go back and dig out the rest, but if you
>>>> continue to dispute your nomination, I'll be happy to do it.
>>>>
>>>> I believe you've claimed ownership of Mr. Plow and me, as well.
>>>>
>> <begin proof>
>>> X-Gerbil-Hamster-Info: Score=0 ScoreLoad=0 ScoreSave=0
>>> Received=20061003040805
>>> Xref: localhost 24hoursupport.helpdesk:7520 alt.comp.anti-virus:2193
>>> alt.comp.os.windows-xp:764 alt.comp.virus:2266
>>> alt.os.windows-xp:3283 alt.privacy.spyware:1588
>>> alt.usenet.kooks:15236 alt.windows-xp:983 Path:
>>> blackhelicopter.databasix.com!news.glorb.com!newsh ub.sdsu.edu!elnk-nf2-pas!newsfeed.earthlink.net!stamper.news.pas.earthl ink.net!newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net.POSTED!70 9dc226!not-for-mail
>>> From: Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ <Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>
>>> Newsgroups:
>>> 24hoursupport.helpdesk,alt.comp.anti-virus,alt.comp.os.windows-xp,alt.comp.virus,alt.os.windows-xp,alt.privacy.spyware,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.window s-xp
>>> Subject: Re: Tell me about this newsgroup
>>> Keywords: Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤
>>> Summary: Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤
>>> Sender: Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@cad.com
>>> Organization: Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤
>>> Reply-To: Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com
>>> Expires: Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤
>>> Message-ID: <4964i2hr36kc4picaguliodngc5rthdnhk@4ax.com>
>>> References: <Xns985112546E913grandmoffdeathstarga@66.133.129.7 1>
>>> <q424i299r43pu7ra0hdn3o1n4ag0kpu0at@4ax.com>
>>> <Xns98511638E3E9Bgrandmoffdeathstarga@66.133.129.7 1>
>>> <ih34i2tu8faa53sikbb7dstsrd062pi7bg@4ax.com>
>>> <Xns98511A94F197grandmoffdeathstarga@66.133.129.71 >
>>> <5tbw95$zvs$o@wretched-pendulums.com>
>>> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.0/32.1071
>>> X-No-Archive: yes
>>> MIME-Version: 1.0
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>>> Lines: 185
>>> Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 08:06:55 GMT
>>> NNTP-Posting-Host: 4.88.79.124
>>> X-Complaints-To: abuse@earthlink.net
>>> X-Trace: newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net 1159862815 4.88.79.124
>>> (Tue, 03 Oct 2006 01:06:55 PDT)
>>> NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 01:06:55 PDT
>>> X-Old-Xref: blackhelicopter.databasix.com
>>> 24hoursupport.helpdesk:100333 alt.comp.anti-virus:12570
>>> alt.comp.os.windows-xp:4122 alt.comp.virus:9334
>>> alt.os.windows-xp:27393 alt.privacy.spyware:10965
>>> alt.usenet.kooks:199914 alt.windows-xp:8362
>>>
>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 13:37:20 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man"
>>> <****-you.ya.****@kiss-my-big-black-ass.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Grand Moff Robert Buchanan <grandmoff@deathstar.galacticempire>,
>>>> the chuck-full marshal, bull****ted:
>>>>
>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>> news:ih34i2tu8faa53sikbb7dstsrd062pi7bg@4ax.com by Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤
>>>>> <Ctrl ¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 07:11:04 GMT, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan
>>>>>> <grandmoff@deathstar.galacticempire> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>> news:q424i299r43pu7ra0hdn3o1n4ag0kpu0at@4ax.com by
>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ <Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:48:06 GMT, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan
>>>>>>>> <grandmoff@deathstar.galacticempire> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>> news:3614i2p71j9pghflcb227a6vt1cp7af7so@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤
>>>>>>>>> <Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:33:36 GMT, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan
>>>>>>>>>> <grandmoff@deathstar.galacticempire> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>> news:6ov3i21sc8ofnn6pjc983461jfl7f90g16@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ <Ctrl ¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:05:29 GMT, Grand Moff Robert
>>>>>>>>>>>> Buchanan <grandmoff@deathstar.galacticempire> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:c4k3i2pjhinlqtqphs8gjg8k5qodhf4uce@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del ¤ <Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 05:35:02 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <****-you.ya.****@kiss-my-big-black-ass.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ <Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>, the person
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who loans money and takes an arm or a leg as interest
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> payment, brown-nosed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A thread chock full of trolls telling a new poster
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stupid **** and generally acting like *******s.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing about that is unusual at all, only ironic.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The ironic part is that so many hypocrites could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> congregate so quickly all in one thread.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A lot of you are the same silly *******s who were just
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> telling some idiotic, long lost, wayfaring, coming back
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the fold looking for old Usenet buddies, sentimental
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sap that I was a troll for calling him a dumb ass and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asking him to go away.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I bet everyone of you are as stupid as you look.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The real irony is that you're sitting in the sewer,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> complaining about the stench, utterly oblivious that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you're adding to it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Add to that the irony of a poster such as yourself that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> most think of as a monosyllabic twit who vomits foul
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> language as easily as a bum wipes his ass with his clean
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hand and the amount of irony is astounding.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> A few points that I should address:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Twits are not, in and of themselves, monosyllabic.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> However, the words they speak may be.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It appears that somebody owns you.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This particular strand of this thread was initiated by me,
>>>>>>>>>> about him.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That does not surprise me.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Now, show me something a little more bizarre than his name
>>>>>>>>>> being mentioned when he is the one being discussed,
>>>>>>>>>> GrandMoff. Oops, that's twice I have typed your moniker in 2
>>>>>>>>>> different posts,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That's my title, not my moniker. And there's a space between
>>>>>>>>> "Grand" and "Moff." BTW, can you ever get anything right?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I prefer GrandMoff, are you stating for the record that you
>>>>>>>> disapprove of GrandMoff?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No, I don't mind if you make an ass of yourself.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> By eliminating one space you have determined that I am making an
>>>>>> ass of myself?
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, yeah. Duh.
>>>>>
>>>>>> You really are the testy one.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> BTW, it is your moniker,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You can't distinguish the difference between a title and a
>>>>>>> moniker. Ha, ha!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sure I can, GrandMoffRobertBuchanan is your moniker, it makes
>>>>>> little difference if your given name is at the end of it, this is
>>>>>> Usenet, idiot.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for making as little sense as possible with that response.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I can provide you with a
>>>>>>>> definition of moniker if you would like for me to do that.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Only if the definition is taken from a legitimate source, such
>>>>>>> a a dictionary. Do you know what a dictionary is?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hmmm, let's see:
>>>>>> --------------------------------------
>>>>>> moniker
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dictionary
>>>>>> Directory > Words > Dictionary
>>>>>> mon·i·ker or mon·ick·er (mon'i-k?r)
>>>>>> n. Slang.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A personal name or nickname.
>>>>>> --------------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now, I would tell you from what dictionary I obtained this
>>>>>> definition, GrandMoff, but I would prefer you to ask me politely.
>>>>>> Show that you have manners and I will share the knowledge.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't care. My dictionary has the same definition. Now look up
>>>>> the
>>>>> definition for "title," note the difference, and wallow in the
>>>>> shame of your own ignorance.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> you may be onto
>>>>>>>>>> something, but I highly doubt it, you don't seem to be that
>>>>>>>>>> swuft.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I can't help it if you're obsessed with him, you spastic
>>>>>>>>> thing, you!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> With who? What the **** are you babbling on about?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I was referring to your freakish obsession with KM. Your
>>>>>>> attention span is terrible!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> KM? Who in the holy ****ing hell is KM? You are one of those
>>>>>> Usenet
>>>>>> freaks everyone warns others about, aren't you?
>>>>>
>>>>> You're not even familiar with the acronym that I've applied to the
>>>>> object of your desire? You're a mess!
>>>>
>>>> I see you've met yet another one from my collection of k0oKs.
>>>> Enjoy.
>>>
>>> Kadaitcha, you are my kook. Remember, you ran off last time we had
>>> a little sparring session. I hurt your monkey like feelings and
>>> you got mad and went away.
>>>
>>> Tonight, you just had to reacquaint yourself with me for some
>>> reason, I don't know why. But, it will end just the same as last
>>> time, me pissing you off and you getting mad and not wanting to
>>> play anymore.
>>>
>>> Altie
>>
>> <end proof>
>>
>>> Rhonda, you are not as stupid as you pretend to be, no ****ing way.
>>> All that bull**** you posted, trying to prove that I have ever said
>>> I "owned" anyone, was for nothing.
>>>
>>> Why was it for nothing? Because I didn't say it, dumb ass. When
>>> you learn how to follow a thread and determine who is typing what,
>>> re-post something that you may think I have posted. Then, I will
>>> analyze it and help you out by telling you if I really posted it or
>>> someone that was replying to me did.
>>>
>>> Example: the sentence above that says "It appears that somebody
>>> owns you" was not written by me.
>>>
>>> Next, try again.
>>>
>>> Altie
>>
>> Argument by snipping, Altie?
>>
>> I restored the context for you. Don't thank me; it was my pleasure.
>>
>
> Rhonda, seriously, read what I am typing and try to absorb it. You
> claim that I said I owned someone, right?
>
> Then, I say that you should at least post some proof of that, which
> you tried to do.
>
> The problem is that this sentence:
>
> "It appears that somebody owns you"
>
> was not written by me.
>
> What exactly do you not understand, Rhonda? You mistakenly believe
> that I posted that I owned someone. This is the second time that I
> have pointed out to you that you are incorrect.
>
> If you like, I will try to present what I have said in a more basic
> way if you really just don't understand. It will be hard for me, I am
> not used to dealing with such stupendous and thick skulled stupidity,
> but I will try.
>
> Altie

Altimer,

We seem to have a communication failure here.

Let me put it to you plainly.

In the post I quoted, you made the claim that a) Kadaitcha is a kook and
b) that he is your kook.

In point of fact, the only kook in this thread is you, Altimer, and you
are owned, jointly, by Chadwick, Mr. Plow and Kadaitcha, among others.

Now will you please **** off and die?

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk

Happiness limits the amount of suffering one is
willing to inflict on others. Phèdre nó Delaunay