I will now respond to a post accessible as
news:9kl6i21k8bl6k1crmlhfgjjndur5li9ppq@4ax.com by Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ <Ctrl
¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>:

> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 06:24:24 GMT, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan
> <grandmoff@deathstar.galacticempire> wrote:
>
>>I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>news:hq96i2dbghvh48i0bimarkvpgk1cbdejkm@4ax.co m by Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤
>><Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>:
>>
>>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 02:47:18 GMT, The Demon Prince of Absurdity
>>> <absurd_number_of_nicks@hell.corn> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 01:32:20 +0000, Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ did the cha-cha,
>>>>and screamed:
>>>>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 01:11:35 GMT, The Demon Prince of Absurdity
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 21:50:20 +0000, Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ did the cha-
cha,
>>>>>>and screamed:
>>>>>>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 03:15:20 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man" wrote:
>>>>>>>>Rhonda Lea Kirk, the trench and ditch digger, dilated:
>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha Man wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Grand Moff Robert Buchanan, the chuck-full marshal,
>>>>>>>>>> bull****ted:
>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>> news:ih34i2tu8faa53sikbb7dstsrd062pi7bg@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 07:11:04 GMT, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:q424i299r43pu7ra0hdn3o1n4ag0kpu0at@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:48:06 GMT, Grand Moff Robert
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Buchanan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:3614i2p71j9pghflcb227a6vt1cp7af7so@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:33:36 GMT, Grand Moff Robert
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Buchanan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:6ov3i21sc8ofnn6pjc983461jfl7f90g16@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:05:29 GMT, Grand Moff Robert
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Buchanan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:c4k3i2pjhinlqtqphs8gjg8k5qodhf4uce@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del ¤:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 05:35:02 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤, the person who loans money and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> takes an arm or a leg as interest payment,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> brown-nosed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A thread chock full of trolls telling a new poster
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stupid **** and generally acting like *******s.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing about that is unusual at all, only ironic.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The ironic part is that so many hypocrites could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> congregate so quickly all in one thread.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A lot of you are the same silly *******s who were
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just telling some idiotic, long lost, wayfaring,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> coming back to the fold looking for old Usenet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> buddies, sentimental sap that I was a troll for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> calling him a dumb ass and asking him to go away.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I bet everyone of you are as stupid as you look.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The real irony is that you're sitting in the sewer,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> complaining about the stench, utterly oblivious
that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you're adding to it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Add to that the irony of a poster such as yourself
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that most think of as a monosyllabic twit who vomits
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> foul language as easily as a bum wipes his ass with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> his clean hand and the amount of irony is
astounding.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A few points that I should address:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Twits are not, in and of themselves, monosyllabic.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However, the words they speak may be.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It appears that somebody owns you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This particular strand of this thread was initiated by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> me, about him.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That does not surprise me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now, show me something a little more bizarre than his
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> name being mentioned when he is the one being discussed,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GrandMoff. Oops, that's twice I have typed your moniker
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in 2 different posts,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's my title, not my moniker. And there's a space
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> between "Grand" and "Moff." BTW, can you ever get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anything right?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I prefer GrandMoff, are you stating for the record that
you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> disapprove of GrandMoff?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, I don't mind if you make an ass of yourself.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> By eliminating one space you have determined that I am
making
>>>>>>>>>>>> an ass of myself?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Well, yeah. Duh.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You really are the testy one.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BTW, it is your moniker,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You can't distinguish the difference between a title and a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> moniker. Ha, ha!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure I can, GrandMoffRobertBuchanan is your moniker, it
makes
>>>>>>>>>>>> little difference if your given name is at the end of it,
>>>>>>>>>>>> this is Usenet, idiot.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for making as little sense as possible with that
>>>>>>>>>>> response.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can provide you with a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> definition of moniker if you would like for me to do that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only if the definition is taken from a legitimate source,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> such a a dictionary. Do you know what a dictionary is?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hmmm, let's see:
>>>>>>>>>>>> -------------------------------------- moniker
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Dictionary
>>>>>>>>>>>> Directory > Words > Dictionary
>>>>>>>>>>>> mon·i·ker or mon·ick·er (mon'i-k?r) n. Slang.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> A personal name or nickname.
>>>>>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Now, I would tell you from what dictionary I obtained this
>>>>>>>>>>>> definition, GrandMoff, but I would prefer you to ask me
>>>>>>>>>>>> politely. Show that you have manners and I will share the
>>>>>>>>>>>> knowledge.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I don't care. My dictionary has the same definition. Now
>>>>>>>>>>> look up the definition for "title," note the difference, and
>>>>>>>>>>> wallow in the shame of your own ignorance.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you may be onto
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something, but I highly doubt it, you don't seem to be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that swuft.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can't help it if you're obsessed with him, you spastic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thing, you!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> With who? What the **** are you babbling on about?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was referring to your freakish obsession with KM. Your
>>>>>>>>>>>>> attention span is terrible!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> KM? Who in the holy ****ing hell is KM? You are one of
>>>>>>>>>>>> those Usenet freaks everyone warns others about, aren't you?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You're not even familiar with the acronym that I've applied
to
>>>>>>>>>>> the object of your desire? You're a mess!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I see you've met yet another one from my collection of k0oKs.
>>>>>>>>>> Enjoy.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I think I own a share of Altimer, dear.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Yes dear, I know; what's mine is yours and what's yours is yours.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I already have Rhonda's mind right, Kadaitcha, now there is just
>>>>>>> you. She crumbles easily, not much fight in her. You have retard
>>>>>>> strength to you though, a little tougher.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Poor old Rhonda just goes around bleating and whining about how I
>>>>>>> am mean and not worth responding to because I drone on. LOL
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The thing is, that is what I wanted to do, methodically break her
>>>>>>> spirit and in doing so, win the game of attrition. Which I did,
>>>>>>> she as much as groveled at my feet.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Here's hoping this ain't too late, and that I haven't already
>>>>>>nominated anyone for it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>George Armstrong Custer "Kicked @$$" Award
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Given to those brave, inspiring crusaders who will keep up a lost
>>>>>>lunatic cause despite all odds, even after the enemy has won, set
up
>>>>>>their own superpower in their midst and are chugging Guinness in a
>>>>>>Kook-free world scenario.
>>>>>
>>>>> That's good, Demon, keep repeating that mantra and eventually your
>>>>> perception may actually become someone's reality. Otherwise, you
>>>>> are grasping at straws, there clearly is no ass kicking going on,
on
>>>>> either side, really.
>>>>>
>>>>> Isn't there a clause in the rules that says something like: just
>>>>> because a poster is slamming your head against the wall over and
>>>>> over doesn't mean that he or she shall be granted an award? Reread
>>>>> the guidebook. Do not abuse your nominating power, it will lose all
>>>>> value.
>>>>
>>>>Awww, that's okay, I haven't replied to you enough, of late, to
>>>>properly apply such a beating to you -- Eris knows you've never done
>>>>so to anyone. Your k00ky k'lames of victory (and ownership of K-Man),
>>>>however, are a sure sign of eligibility for this award, which, alas,
>>>>shall be for October.
>>>
>>> So, in other words, you are rock stupid and this is just how you
>>> operate? Over-exaggerated claims of ownership do not make it so.
>>> Example: Kadaitcha claims over and over in every post that I am
owned.
>>
>>And you mention him far more often than you would need to to convince
>>everyone that it's true.
>
> Convince everyone that what is true, GrandMoff?
>
>>
>>> He only does this when he runs out of bull**** to reply with. But,
>>> again, it just doesn't make it true. There has to be undeniable
>>> proof, I know the rules, *****.
>>
>>Oh, tell us all about these little rules of yours!
>
> What rules, GrandMoff?

Grizzly Antagonist from soc.fr00ts used to do this when he was being
simultaneously spanked and trolled too, and it made him look as stupid as
you do right now!

--
Grand Moff Robert Buchanan
Administrator of Death Star 6.2
Former governor of the solar system of Selus
Master of Mindy (arf)

<http://www.robertbuchanan.name/>
<http://www.simpy.com/user/rbuchanan>

Economic Left/Right: -0.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.18