I will now respond to a post accessible as
news:ih34i2tu8faa53sikbb7dstsrd062pi7bg@4ax.com by Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ <Ctrl
¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>:

> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 07:11:04 GMT, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan
> <grandmoff@deathstar.galacticempire> wrote:
>
>>I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>news:q424i299r43pu7ra0hdn3o1n4ag0kpu0at@4ax.co m by Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤
>><Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>:
>>
>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:48:06 GMT, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan
>>> <grandmoff@deathstar.galacticempire> wrote:
>>>
>>>>I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>news:3614i2p71j9pghflcb227a6vt1cp7af7so@4ax.co m by Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤
>>>><Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:33:36 GMT, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan
>>>>> <grandmoff@deathstar.galacticempire> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>news:6ov3i21sc8ofnn6pjc983461jfl7f90g16@4ax. com by Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤
>>>>>><Ctrl ¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:05:29 GMT, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan
>>>>>>> <grandmoff@deathstar.galacticempire> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>news:c4k3i2pjhinlqtqphs8gjg8k5qodhf4uce@4a x.com by Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del
¤
>>>>>>>><Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 05:35:02 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man"
>>>>>>>>> <****-you.ya.****@kiss-my-big-black-ass.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ <Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>, the person who loans
>>>>>>>>>>money and takes an arm or a leg as interest payment,
>>>>>>>>>>brown-nosed:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> A thread chock full of trolls telling a new poster stupid
****
>>>>>>>>>>> and generally acting like *******s.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing about that is unusual at all, only ironic.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The ironic part is that so many hypocrites could congregate
so
>>>>>>>>>>> quickly all in one thread.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> A lot of you are the same silly *******s who were just
telling
>>>>>>>>>>> some idiotic, long lost, wayfaring, coming back to the fold
>>>>>>>>>>> looking for old Usenet buddies, sentimental sap that I was a
>>>>>>>>>>> troll for calling him a dumb ass and asking him to go away.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I bet everyone of you are as stupid as you look.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>The real irony is that you're sitting in the sewer, complaining
>>>>>>>>>>about the stench, utterly oblivious that you're adding to it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Add to that the irony of a poster such as yourself that most
>>>>>>>>> think of as a monosyllabic twit who vomits foul language as
>>>>>>>>> easily as a bum wipes his ass with his clean hand and the
amount
>>>>>>>>> of irony is astounding.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>A few points that I should address:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>-Twits are not, in and of themselves, monosyllabic. However, the
>>>>>>>>words they speak may be.
>>>>>>
>>>>>><snip>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>
>>>>>><snip>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>
>>>>>><snip>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>
>>>>>><snip>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>It appears that somebody owns you.
>>>>>
>>>>> This particular strand of this thread was initiated by me, about
>>>>> him.
>>>>
>>>>That does not surprise me.
>>>>
>>>>> Now, show me something a little more bizarre than his name being
>>>>> mentioned when he is the one being discussed, GrandMoff. Oops,
>>>>> that's twice I have typed your moniker in 2 different posts,
>>>>
>>>>That's my title, not my moniker. And there's a space between "Grand"
>>>>and "Moff." BTW, can you ever get anything right?
>>>
>>> I prefer GrandMoff, are you stating for the record that you
disapprove
>>> of GrandMoff?
>>
>>No, I don't mind if you make an ass of yourself.
>
> By eliminating one space you have determined that I am making an ass
> of myself?

Well, yeah. Duh.

> You really are the testy one.

Thank you.

>>> BTW, it is your moniker,
>>
>>You can't distinguish the difference between a title and a moniker.
Ha,
>>ha!
>
> Sure I can, GrandMoffRobertBuchanan is your moniker, it makes little
> difference if your given name is at the end of it, this is Usenet,
> idiot.

Thanks for making as little sense as possible with that response.

>>> I can provide you with a
>>> definition of moniker if you would like for me to do that.
>>
>>Only if the definition is taken from a legitimate source, such a a
>>dictionary. Do you know what a dictionary is?
>
>
> Hmmm, let's see:
> --------------------------------------
> moniker
>
> Dictionary
> Directory > Words > Dictionary
> mon·i·ker or mon·ick·er (mon'i-k?r)
> n. Slang.
>
> A personal name or nickname.
> --------------------------------------
>
> Now, I would tell you from what dictionary I obtained this definition,
> GrandMoff, but I would prefer you to ask me politely. Show that you
> have manners and I will share the knowledge.

I don't care. My dictionary has the same definition. Now look up the
definition for "title," note the difference, and wallow in the shame of
your own ignorance.

>>>>> you may be onto
>>>>> something, but I highly doubt it, you don't seem to be that swuft.
>>>>
>>>>I can't help it if you're obsessed with him, you spastic thing, you!
>>>
>>> With who? What the **** are you babbling on about?
>>
>>I was referring to your freakish obsession with KM. Your attention
span
>>is terrible!
>
> KM? Who in the holy ****ing hell is KM? You are one of those Usenet
> freaks everyone warns others about, aren't you?

You're not even familiar with the acronym that I've applied to the object
of your desire? You're a mess!

--
Robert Buchanan
Grand Moff of Death Star 6.2
Master of Mindy (arf)

<http://www.robertbuchanan.name/>
<http://www.simpy.com/user/rbuchanan>

Economic Left/Right: -0.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.18