Rhonda Lea Kirk <rhondalea@gmail.com>, the worker of the fish trap,
rued:
> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ wrote:
>> On Wed, 4 Oct 2006 22:40:38 -0400, "Rhonda Lea Kirk"
>> <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 4 Oct 2006 20:44:26 -0400, "Rhonda Lea Kirk"
>>>> <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ wrote:
>>>>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 04:47:42 GMT, The Demon Prince of Absurdity
>>>>>>>> <absurd_number_of_nicks@hell.corn> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 03:23:47 +0000, Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ did the
>>>>>>>>> cha-cha,
>>>>>>>>> and screamed:
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 02:47:18 GMT, The Demon Prince of
>>>>>>>>>> Absurdity wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 01:32:20 +0000, Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ did the
>>>>>>>>>>> cha-cha,
>>>>>>>>>>> and screamed:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 01:11:35 GMT, The Demon Prince of
>>>>>>>>>>>> Absurdity wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 21:50:20 +0000, Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ did
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the cha-cha, and screamed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 03:15:20 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk, the trench and ditch digger, dilated:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha Man wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Grand Moff Robert Buchanan, the chuck-full marshal,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bull****ted:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:ih34i2tu8faa53sikbb7dstsrd062pi7bg@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 07:11:04 GMT, Grand Moff Robert
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Buchanan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:q424i299r43pu7ra0hdn3o1n4ag0kpu0at@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:48:06 GMT, Grand Moff
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Robert Buchanan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:3614i2p71j9pghflcb227a6vt1cp7af7so@4ax.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:33:36 GMT, Grand Moff
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Robert Buchanan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:6ov3i21sc8ofnn6pjc983461jfl7f90g16@4ax.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:05:29 GMT, Grand Moff
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Robert Buchanan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:c4k3i2pjhinlqtqphs8gjg8k5qodhf4uce@4ax.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del ¤:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 05:35:02 +0545,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Kadaitcha Man" wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤, the person who loans money
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and takes an arm or a leg as interest
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> payment, brown-nosed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A thread chock full of trolls telling a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> new poster stupid **** and generally
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> acting like *******s.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing about that is unusual at all, only
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ironic.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The ironic part is that so many hypocrites
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> congregate so quickly all in one thread.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A lot of you are the same silly *******s
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who were just telling some idiotic, long
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lost, wayfaring, coming back to the fold
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> looking for old Usenet buddies,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sentimental sap that I was a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> troll for calling him a dumb ass and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asking him to go away.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I bet everyone of you are as stupid as you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> look.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The real irony is that you're sitting in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the sewer, complaining about the stench,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> utterly oblivious that you're adding to it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Add to that the irony of a poster such as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yourself
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that most think of as a monosyllabic twit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who vomits foul language as easily as a bum
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wipes his ass with his clean hand and the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> amount of irony is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> astounding.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A few points that I should address:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Twits are not, in and of themselves,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> monosyllabic.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However, the words they speak may be.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It appears that somebody owns you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This particular strand of this thread was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> initiated by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> me, about him.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That does not surprise me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now, show me something a little more bizarre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than his name being mentioned when he is the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one being discussed, GrandMoff. Oops, that's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> twice I have typed your moniker in 2 different
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> posts,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's my title, not my moniker. And there's a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> space between "Grand" and "Moff." BTW, can you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ever get anything right?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I prefer GrandMoff, are you stating for the record
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that you disapprove of GrandMoff?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, I don't mind if you make an ass of yourself.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> By eliminating one space you have determined that I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> am making an ass of myself?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, yeah. Duh.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You really are the testy one.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BTW, it is your moniker,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You can't distinguish the difference between a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> title and a moniker. Ha, ha!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure I can, GrandMoffRobertBuchanan is your moniker,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it makes little difference if your given name is at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the end of it, this is Usenet, idiot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for making as little sense as possible with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that response.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can provide you with a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> definition of moniker if you would like for me to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only if the definition is taken from a legitimate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> source,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> such a a dictionary. Do you know what a dictionary
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hmmm, let's see:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -------------------------------------- moniker
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dictionary
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Directory > Words > Dictionary
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mon·i·ker or mon·ick·er (mon'i-k?r) n. Slang.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A personal name or nickname.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now, I would tell you from what dictionary I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> obtained this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> definition, GrandMoff, but I would prefer you to ask
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> me politely. Show that you have manners and I will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> share the knowledge.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't care. My dictionary has the same definition.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now look up the definition for "title," note the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> difference, and wallow in the shame of your own
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignorance.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you may be onto
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something, but I highly doubt it, you don't seem
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that swuft.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can't help it if you're obsessed with him, you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> spastic thing, you!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> With who? What the **** are you babbling on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was referring to your freakish obsession with KM.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> attention span is terrible!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> KM? Who in the holy ****ing hell is KM? You are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one of those Usenet freaks everyone warns others
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about, aren't you?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're not even familiar with the acronym that I've
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> applied
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the object of your desire? You're a mess!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I see you've met yet another one from my collection of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> k0oKs. Enjoy.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think I own a share of Altimer, dear.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes dear, I know; what's mine is yours and what's yours
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is yours.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I already have Rhonda's mind right, Kadaitcha, now there
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is just you. She crumbles easily, not much fight in her.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> retard strength to you though, a little tougher.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Poor old Rhonda just goes around bleating and whining
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about how
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am mean and not worth responding to because I drone on.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The thing is, that is what I wanted to do, methodically
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> break her spirit and in doing so, win the game of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> attrition. Which I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> did, she as much as groveled at my feet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here's hoping this ain't too late, and that I haven't
>>>>>>>>>>>>> already nominated anyone for it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> George Armstrong Custer "Kicked @$$" Award
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Given to those brave, inspiring crusaders who will keep up
>>>>>>>>>>>>> a lost lunatic cause despite all odds, even after the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> enemy has won, set up their own superpower in their midst
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and are chugging
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Guinness in a Kook-free world scenario.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> That's good, Demon, keep repeating that mantra and
>>>>>>>>>>>> eventually your perception may actually become someone's
>>>>>>>>>>>> reality. Otherwise, you are grasping at straws, there
>>>>>>>>>>>> clearly is no ass kicking going on, on either side, really.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Isn't there a clause in the rules that says something like:
>>>>>>>>>>>> just because a poster is slamming your head against the
>>>>>>>>>>>> wall over and over doesn't mean that he or she shall be
>>>>>>>>>>>> granted an award? Reread the guidebook. Do not abuse your
>>>>>>>>>>>> nominating power, it will
>>>>>>>>>>>> lose all value.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Awww, that's okay, I haven't replied to you enough, of late,
>>>>>>>>>>> to properly apply such a beating to you -- Eris knows you've
>>>>>>>>>>> never done so to anyone. Your k00ky k'lames of victory (and
>>>>>>>>>>> ownership of
>>>>>>>>>>> K-Man), however, are a sure sign of eligibility for this
>>>>>>>>>>> award, which, alas, shall be for October.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So, in other words, you are rock stupid and this is just how
>>>>>>>>>> you operate? Over-exaggerated claims of ownership do not make
>>>>>>>>>> it so. Example: Kadaitcha claims over and over in every post
>>>>>>>>>> that I am owned. He only does this when he runs out of
>>>>>>>>>> bull**** to reply with. But, again, it just doesn't make it
>>>>>>>>>> true. There has to be undeniable proof, I know the rules,
>>>>>>>>>> *****.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Bloviation to avoid admitting a ****-up noted. You made the
>>>>>>>>> k'lame of ownership.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You are simply sidestepping the base issue of dubious claimants
>>>>>>>> of ownership. In order to play this game that you want to
>>>>>>>> play, I will require "at least" one statement by myself that I
>>>>>>>> owned anyone. You will have to provide this statement,
>>>>>>>> supposedly made by myself, with full headers.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Otherwise, you are standing on shaky ground.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Altie
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Here's one. I have to go back and dig out the rest, but if you
>>>>>>> continue to dispute your nomination, I'll be happy to do it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I believe you've claimed ownership of Mr. Plow and me, as well.
>>>>>>>
>>>>> <begin proof>
>>>>>> X-Gerbil-Hamster-Info: Score=0 ScoreLoad=0 ScoreSave=0
>>>>>> Received=20061003040805
>>>>>> Xref: localhost 24hoursupport.helpdesk:7520
>>>>>> alt.comp.anti-virus:2193 alt.comp.os.windows-xp:764
>>>>>> alt.comp.virus:2266 alt.os.windows-xp:3283
>>>>>> alt.privacy.spyware:1588 alt.usenet.kooks:15236
>>>>>> alt.windows-xp:983 Path:
>>>>>> blackhelicopter.databasix.com!news.glorb.com!newsh ub.sdsu.edu!elnk-nf2-pas!newsfeed.earthlink.net!stamper.news.pas.earthl ink.net!newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net.POSTED!70 9dc226!not-for-mail
>>>>>> From: Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ <Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>
>>>>>> Newsgroups:
>>>>>> 24hoursupport.helpdesk,alt.comp.anti-virus,alt.comp.os.windows-xp,alt.comp.virus,alt.os.windows-xp,alt.privacy.spyware,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.window s-xp
>>>>>> Subject: Re: Tell me about this newsgroup
>>>>>> Keywords: Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤
>>>>>> Summary: Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤
>>>>>> Sender: Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@cad.com
>>>>>> Organization: Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤
>>>>>> Reply-To: Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com
>>>>>> Expires: Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤
>>>>>> Message-ID: <4964i2hr36kc4picaguliodngc5rthdnhk@4ax.com>
>>>>>> References: <Xns985112546E913grandmoffdeathstarga@66.133.129.7 1>
>>>>>> <q424i299r43pu7ra0hdn3o1n4ag0kpu0at@4ax.com>
>>>>>> <Xns98511638E3E9Bgrandmoffdeathstarga@66.133.129.7 1>
>>>>>> <ih34i2tu8faa53sikbb7dstsrd062pi7bg@4ax.com>
>>>>>> <Xns98511A94F197grandmoffdeathstarga@66.133.129.71 >
>>>>>> <5tbw95$zvs$o@wretched-pendulums.com>
>>>>>> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.0/32.1071
>>>>>> X-No-Archive: yes
>>>>>> MIME-Version: 1.0
>>>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>>>>>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>>>>>> Lines: 185
>>>>>> Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 08:06:55 GMT
>>>>>> NNTP-Posting-Host: 4.88.79.124
>>>>>> X-Complaints-To: abuse@earthlink.net
>>>>>> X-Trace: newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net 1159862815 4.88.79.124
>>>>>> (Tue, 03 Oct 2006 01:06:55 PDT)
>>>>>> NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 01:06:55 PDT
>>>>>> X-Old-Xref: blackhelicopter.databasix.com
>>>>>> 24hoursupport.helpdesk:100333 alt.comp.anti-virus:12570
>>>>>> alt.comp.os.windows-xp:4122 alt.comp.virus:9334
>>>>>> alt.os.windows-xp:27393 alt.privacy.spyware:10965
>>>>>> alt.usenet.kooks:199914 alt.windows-xp:8362
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 13:37:20 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man"
>>>>>> <****-you.ya.****@kiss-my-big-black-ass.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Grand Moff Robert Buchanan <grandmoff@deathstar.galacticempire>,
>>>>>>> the chuck-full marshal, bull****ted:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>> news:ih34i2tu8faa53sikbb7dstsrd062pi7bg@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ <Ctrl ¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 07:11:04 GMT, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan
>>>>>>>>> <grandmoff@deathstar.galacticempire> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>> news:q424i299r43pu7ra0hdn3o1n4ag0kpu0at@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ <Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:48:06 GMT, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan
>>>>>>>>>>> <grandmoff@deathstar.galacticempire> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>> news:3614i2p71j9pghflcb227a6vt1cp7af7so@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤
>>>>>>>>>>>> <Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:33:36 GMT, Grand Moff Robert
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Buchanan <grandmoff@deathstar.galacticempire> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:6ov3i21sc8ofnn6pjc983461jfl7f90g16@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ <Ctrl ¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:05:29 GMT, Grand Moff Robert
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Buchanan <grandmoff@deathstar.galacticempire> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:c4k3i2pjhinlqtqphs8gjg8k5qodhf4uce@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del ¤ <Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 05:35:02 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <****-you.ya.****@kiss-my-big-black-ass.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ <Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>, the person
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who loans money and takes an arm or a leg as interest
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> payment, brown-nosed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A thread chock full of trolls telling a new poster
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stupid **** and generally acting like *******s.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing about that is unusual at all, only ironic.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The ironic part is that so many hypocrites could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> congregate so quickly all in one thread.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A lot of you are the same silly *******s who were
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just telling some idiotic, long lost, wayfaring,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> coming back to the fold looking for old Usenet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> buddies, sentimental sap that I was a troll for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> calling him a dumb ass and asking him to go away.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I bet everyone of you are as stupid as you look.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The real irony is that you're sitting in the sewer,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> complaining about the stench, utterly oblivious that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you're adding to it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Add to that the irony of a poster such as yourself
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that most think of as a monosyllabic twit who vomits
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> foul language as easily as a bum wipes his ass with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> his clean hand and the amount of irony is astounding.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A few points that I should address:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Twits are not, in and of themselves, monosyllabic.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However, the words they speak may be.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It appears that somebody owns you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> This particular strand of this thread was initiated by me,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> about him.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> That does not surprise me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now, show me something a little more bizarre than his name
>>>>>>>>>>>>> being mentioned when he is the one being discussed,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> GrandMoff. Oops, that's twice I have typed your moniker in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2 different posts,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> That's my title, not my moniker. And there's a space
>>>>>>>>>>>> between "Grand" and "Moff." BTW, can you ever get anything
>>>>>>>>>>>> right?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I prefer GrandMoff, are you stating for the record that you
>>>>>>>>>>> disapprove of GrandMoff?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> No, I don't mind if you make an ass of yourself.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> By eliminating one space you have determined that I am making
>>>>>>>>> an ass of myself?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Well, yeah. Duh.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You really are the testy one.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> BTW, it is your moniker,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You can't distinguish the difference between a title and a
>>>>>>>>>> moniker. Ha, ha!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Sure I can, GrandMoffRobertBuchanan is your moniker, it makes
>>>>>>>>> little difference if your given name is at the end of it, this
>>>>>>>>> is Usenet, idiot.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks for making as little sense as possible with that
>>>>>>>> response.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I can provide you with a
>>>>>>>>>>> definition of moniker if you would like for me to do that.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Only if the definition is taken from a legitimate source,
>>>>>>>>>> such a a dictionary. Do you know what a dictionary is?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hmmm, let's see:
>>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>> moniker
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Dictionary
>>>>>>>>> Directory > Words > Dictionary
>>>>>>>>> mon·i·ker or mon·ick·er (mon'i-k?r)
>>>>>>>>> n. Slang.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> A personal name or nickname.
>>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Now, I would tell you from what dictionary I obtained this
>>>>>>>>> definition, GrandMoff, but I would prefer you to ask me
>>>>>>>>> politely. Show that you have manners and I will share the
>>>>>>>>> knowledge.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I don't care. My dictionary has the same definition. Now look
>>>>>>>> up the
>>>>>>>> definition for "title," note the difference, and wallow in the
>>>>>>>> shame of your own ignorance.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> you may be onto
>>>>>>>>>>>>> something, but I highly doubt it, you don't seem to be
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that swuft.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I can't help it if you're obsessed with him, you spastic
>>>>>>>>>>>> thing, you!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> With who? What the **** are you babbling on about?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I was referring to your freakish obsession with KM. Your
>>>>>>>>>> attention span is terrible!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> KM? Who in the holy ****ing hell is KM? You are one of those
>>>>>>>>> Usenet
>>>>>>>>> freaks everyone warns others about, aren't you?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You're not even familiar with the acronym that I've applied to
>>>>>>>> the object of your desire? You're a mess!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I see you've met yet another one from my collection of k0oKs.
>>>>>>> Enjoy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kadaitcha, you are my kook. Remember, you ran off last time we
>>>>>> had a little sparring session. I hurt your monkey like feelings
>>>>>> and you got mad and went away.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tonight, you just had to reacquaint yourself with me for some
>>>>>> reason, I don't know why. But, it will end just the same as last
>>>>>> time, me pissing you off and you getting mad and not wanting to
>>>>>> play anymore.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Altie
>>>>>
>>>>> <end proof>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Rhonda, you are not as stupid as you pretend to be, no ****ing
>>>>>> way. All that bull**** you posted, trying to prove that I have
>>>>>> ever said I "owned" anyone, was for nothing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why was it for nothing? Because I didn't say it, dumb ass. When
>>>>>> you learn how to follow a thread and determine who is typing
>>>>>> what, re-post something that you may think I have posted. Then,
>>>>>> I will analyze it and help you out by telling you if I really
>>>>>> posted it or someone that was replying to me did.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Example: the sentence above that says "It appears that somebody
>>>>>> owns you" was not written by me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Next, try again.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Altie
>>>>>
>>>>> Argument by snipping, Altie?
>>>>>
>>>>> I restored the context for you. Don't thank me; it was my
>>>>> pleasure.
>>>>
>>>> Rhonda, seriously, read what I am typing and try to absorb it. You
>>>> claim that I said I owned someone, right?
>>>>
>>>> Then, I say that you should at least post some proof of that, which
>>>> you tried to do.
>>>>
>>>> The problem is that this sentence:
>>>>
>>>> "It appears that somebody owns you"
>>>>
>>>> was not written by me.
>>>>
>>>> What exactly do you not understand, Rhonda? You mistakenly believe
>>>> that I posted that I owned someone. This is the second time that I
>>>> have pointed out to you that you are incorrect.
>>>>
>>>> If you like, I will try to present what I have said in a more basic
>>>> way if you really just don't understand. It will be hard for me, I
>>>> am not used to dealing with such stupendous and thick skulled
>>>> stupidity, but I will try.
>>>>
>>>> Altie
>>>
>>> Altimer,
>>>
>>> We seem to have a communication failure here.
>>>
>>> Let me put it to you plainly.
>>>
>>> In the post I quoted, you made the claim that a) Kadaitcha is a kook
>>> and b) that he is your kook.
>>>
>>> In point of fact, the only kook in this thread is you, Altimer, and
>>> you are owned, jointly, by Chadwick, Mr. Plow and Kadaitcha, among
>>> others.
>>
>>
>> And there we have it, straight from Rhonda's mouth to my screen,
>> excessive claims of ownage. Which award do you win? I don't keep up
>> with all that award bull****, just tell me which one you should now
>> be eligible to nominate yourself for, Rhonda. Can you nominate
>> yourself? Either way, I bet you could win one.
>>
>>>
>>> Now will you please **** off and die?
>>
>> No, Rhonda, I will not. You should know better than that. You just
>> keep right on along bopping around Usenet proclaiming who you think
>> owns others, like KingKook, and don't worry about me.
>
> Y'know, Altie, I don't think I've ever claimed personal ownership of
> anyone.
HURUMPH!!!
--
alt.usenet.kooks - Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker:
September 2005 and April 2006
"K-Man's particular genius, however, lies not merely in his humour,
but his ability to make posters who had previously seemed reasonably
well-balanced turn into foaming, frothing, death threat-uttering
maniacs" - Snarky, Demon Lord of Confusion
Thou rodent. Boils and plagues plaster you over, that you may be
abhorred farther than seen and one infect another against the wind a
mile. Thou soul of a goose that bears the shape of a man.
Reply With Quote
854i21tblau7vr0mtaacprnj3qjrpdmso@4ax.com by