Re: Tell me about this newsgroup

[Grand Moff Robert Buchanan]

I will now respond to a post accessible as
news:s8l6i2pvtvve1sg79p51454tqb4lcebreo@4ax.com by Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤
<Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>:

> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 05:37:09 GMT, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan
> <grandmoff@deathstar.galacticempire> wrote:
>
>>I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>news3v5i21gv9ajdlglrqc72oq4hla70r8qgl@4ax.com by Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤
>><Ctrl ¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>:
>>
>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 23:51:36 GMT, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan
>>> <grandmoff@deathstar.galacticempire> wrote:
>>>
>>>>I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>news:1h64i2di4ij98ng5ps75s9oi6agamvvpv7@4ax.co m by Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤
>><Ctrl
>>>>¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 07:59:24 GMT, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan
>>>>> <grandmoff@deathstar.galacticempire> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>I will now respond to a post accessible as news:5tbw95$zvs
>>$o@wretched-
>>>>>>pendulums.com by "Kadaitcha Man"
>>>>>><****-you.ya.****@kiss-my-big-black- ass.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Grand Moff Robert Buchanan <grandmoff@deathstar.galacticempire>,
>>the
>>>>>>> chuck-full marshal, bull****ted:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>> news:ih34i2tu8faa53sikbb7dstsrd062pi7bg@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ <Ctrl ¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 07:11:04 GMT, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan
>>>>>>>>> <grandmoff@deathstar.galacticempire> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>> news:q424i299r43pu7ra0hdn3o1n4ag0kpu0at@4ax.com by Ctrl¤/Alt
>>¤/Del¤
>>>>>>>>>> <Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:48:06 GMT, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan
>>>>>>>>>>> <grandmoff@deathstar.galacticempire> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>> news:3614i2p71j9pghflcb227a6vt1cp7af7so@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt
>>>>¤/Del¤
>>>>>>>>>>>> <Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:33:36 GMT, Grand Moff Robert
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Buchanan <grandmoff@deathstar.galacticempire> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:6ov3i21sc8ofnn6pjc983461jfl7f90g16@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ <Ctrl ¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:05:29 GMT, Grand Moff Robert
>>Buchanan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <grandmoff@deathstar.galacticempire> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:c4k3i2pjhinlqtqphs8gjg8k5qodhf4uce@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del ¤ <Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 05:35:02 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <****-you.ya.****@kiss-my-big-black-ass.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ <Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>, the person
>>who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> loans money and takes an arm or a leg as interest
>>payment,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> brown-nosed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A thread chock full of trolls telling a new poster
>>stupid
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> **** and generally acting like *******s.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing about that is unusual at all, only ironic.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The ironic part is that so many hypocrites could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> congregate so quickly all in one thread.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A lot of you are the same silly *******s who were
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just telling some idiotic, long lost, wayfaring,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> coming back
>>>>to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the fold looking for old Usenet buddies, sentimental
>>sap
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that I was a troll for calling him a dumb ass and
>>asking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> him to go away.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I bet everyone of you are as stupid as you look.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The real irony is that you're sitting in the sewer,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> complaining about the stench, utterly oblivious that
>>>>you're
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adding to it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Add to that the irony of a poster such as yourself
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>most
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think of as a monosyllabic twit who vomits foul
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> language
>>as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> easily as a bum wipes his ass with his clean hand and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the amount of irony is astounding.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A few points that I should address:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Twits are not, in and of themselves, monosyllabic.
>>>>However,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the words they speak may be.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It appears that somebody owns you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> This particular strand of this thread was initiated by me,
>>>>about
>>>>>>>>>>>>> him.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> That does not surprise me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now, show me something a little more bizarre than his name
>>>>being
>>>>>>>>>>>>> mentioned when he is the one being discussed, GrandMoff.
>>Oops,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that's twice I have typed your moniker in 2 different
>>>>>>>>>>>>> posts,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> That's my title, not my moniker. And there's a space
>>>>>>>>>>>> between "Grand" and "Moff." BTW, can you ever get anything
>>>>>>>>>>>> right?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I prefer GrandMoff, are you stating for the record that you
>>>>>>>>>>> disapprove of GrandMoff?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> No, I don't mind if you make an ass of yourself.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> By eliminating one space you have determined that I am making
>>>>>>>>> an
>>>>ass
>>>>>>>>> of myself?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Well, yeah. Duh.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You really are the testy one.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> BTW, it is your moniker,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You can't distinguish the difference between a title and a
>>>>moniker.
>>>>>>>> Ha,
>>>>>>>>>> ha!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Sure I can, GrandMoffRobertBuchanan is your moniker, it makes
>>>>little
>>>>>>>>> difference if your given name is at the end of it, this is
>>Usenet,
>>>>>>>>> idiot.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks for making as little sense as possible with that
>>>>>>>> response.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I can provide you with a
>>>>>>>>>>> definition of moniker if you would like for me to do that.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Only if the definition is taken from a legitimate source,
>>>>>>>>>> such a
>>a
>>>>>>>>>> dictionary. Do you know what a dictionary is?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hmmm, let's see:
>>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>> moniker
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Dictionary
>>>>>>>>> Directory > Words > Dictionary
>>>>>>>>> mon·i·ker or mon·ick·er (mon'i-k?r)
>>>>>>>>> n. Slang.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> A personal name or nickname.
>>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Now, I would tell you from what dictionary I obtained this
>>>>>>>>> definition, GrandMoff, but I would prefer you to ask me
>>>>>>>>> politely. Show that you have manners and I will share the
>>>>>>>>> knowledge.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I don't care. My dictionary has the same definition. Now look
>>>>>>>> up
>>>>the
>>>>>>>> definition for "title," note the difference, and wallow in the
>>shame
>>>>>>>> of your own ignorance.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> you may be onto
>>>>>>>>>>>>> something, but I highly doubt it, you don't seem to be
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that swuft.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I can't help it if you're obsessed with him, you spastic
>>thing,
>>>>>>>>>>>> you!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> With who? What the **** are you babbling on about?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I was referring to your freakish obsession with KM. Your
>>>>attention
>>>>>>>>>> span is terrible!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> KM? Who in the holy ****ing hell is KM? You are one of those
>>>>Usenet
>>>>>>>>> freaks everyone warns others about, aren't you?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You're not even familiar with the acronym that I've applied to
>>>>>>>> the object of your desire? You're a mess!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I see you've met yet another one from my collection of k0oKs.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>He's quite a moron. I like him!
>>>>>
>>>>> GrandMoff, want me to teach you how to not sound quite as stupid
>>>>> as you do? Let me know.
>>>>
>>>>Why do you think that you know what I sound like from reading my
>>>>USENET posts?
>>>
>>> Why would someone familiar with Usenet for years probably, ask such
>>> a dumb ass question? Leave those silly and piddly questions to
>>> newbies. Act like you are somebody, GrandMoff. Don't be piddly,
>>> don't piddle, and most of all, don't be a piddler.
>>
>>That didn't answer my question.
>
> It answered mine though, you act silly, ask redundant questions,

Wow, what a revelation! Thanks for clearing that up for yourself and
nobody else.

> and
> rely on weak tactics that lead you nowhere. Wise up, GrandMoff, stop
> committing pidlery.

It's amazing. You jump into the boat before I can even cast a line.

--
Grand Moff Robert Buchanan
Administrator of Death Star 6.2
Former governor of the solar system of Selus
Master of Mindy (arf)

<http://www.robertbuchanan.name/>
<http://www.simpy.com/user/rbuchanan>

Economic Left/Right: -0.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.18

[Grand Moff Robert Buchanan]

I will now respond to a post accessible as
news:9kl6i21k8bl6k1crmlhfgjjndur5li9ppq@4ax.com by Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ <Ctrl
¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>:

> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 06:24:24 GMT, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan
> <grandmoff@deathstar.galacticempire> wrote:
>
>>I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>news:hq96i2dbghvh48i0bimarkvpgk1cbdejkm@4ax.co m by Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤
>><Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>:
>>
>>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 02:47:18 GMT, The Demon Prince of Absurdity
>>> <absurd_number_of_nicks@hell.corn> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 01:32:20 +0000, Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ did the cha-cha,
>>>>and screamed:
>>>>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 01:11:35 GMT, The Demon Prince of Absurdity
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 21:50:20 +0000, Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ did the cha-
cha,
>>>>>>and screamed:
>>>>>>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 03:15:20 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man" wrote:
>>>>>>>>Rhonda Lea Kirk, the trench and ditch digger, dilated:
>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha Man wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Grand Moff Robert Buchanan, the chuck-full marshal,
>>>>>>>>>> bull****ted:
>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>> news:ih34i2tu8faa53sikbb7dstsrd062pi7bg@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 07:11:04 GMT, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:q424i299r43pu7ra0hdn3o1n4ag0kpu0at@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:48:06 GMT, Grand Moff Robert
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Buchanan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:3614i2p71j9pghflcb227a6vt1cp7af7so@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:33:36 GMT, Grand Moff Robert
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Buchanan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:6ov3i21sc8ofnn6pjc983461jfl7f90g16@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:05:29 GMT, Grand Moff Robert
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Buchanan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:c4k3i2pjhinlqtqphs8gjg8k5qodhf4uce@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del ¤:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 05:35:02 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤, the person who loans money and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> takes an arm or a leg as interest payment,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> brown-nosed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A thread chock full of trolls telling a new poster
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stupid **** and generally acting like *******s.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing about that is unusual at all, only ironic.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The ironic part is that so many hypocrites could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> congregate so quickly all in one thread.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A lot of you are the same silly *******s who were
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just telling some idiotic, long lost, wayfaring,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> coming back to the fold looking for old Usenet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> buddies, sentimental sap that I was a troll for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> calling him a dumb ass and asking him to go away.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I bet everyone of you are as stupid as you look.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The real irony is that you're sitting in the sewer,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> complaining about the stench, utterly oblivious
that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you're adding to it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Add to that the irony of a poster such as yourself
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that most think of as a monosyllabic twit who vomits
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> foul language as easily as a bum wipes his ass with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> his clean hand and the amount of irony is
astounding.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A few points that I should address:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Twits are not, in and of themselves, monosyllabic.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However, the words they speak may be.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It appears that somebody owns you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This particular strand of this thread was initiated by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> me, about him.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That does not surprise me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now, show me something a little more bizarre than his
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> name being mentioned when he is the one being discussed,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GrandMoff. Oops, that's twice I have typed your moniker
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in 2 different posts,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's my title, not my moniker. And there's a space
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> between "Grand" and "Moff." BTW, can you ever get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anything right?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I prefer GrandMoff, are you stating for the record that
you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> disapprove of GrandMoff?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, I don't mind if you make an ass of yourself.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> By eliminating one space you have determined that I am
making
>>>>>>>>>>>> an ass of myself?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Well, yeah. Duh.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You really are the testy one.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BTW, it is your moniker,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You can't distinguish the difference between a title and a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> moniker. Ha, ha!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure I can, GrandMoffRobertBuchanan is your moniker, it
makes
>>>>>>>>>>>> little difference if your given name is at the end of it,
>>>>>>>>>>>> this is Usenet, idiot.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for making as little sense as possible with that
>>>>>>>>>>> response.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can provide you with a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> definition of moniker if you would like for me to do that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only if the definition is taken from a legitimate source,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> such a a dictionary. Do you know what a dictionary is?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hmmm, let's see:
>>>>>>>>>>>> -------------------------------------- moniker
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Dictionary
>>>>>>>>>>>> Directory > Words > Dictionary
>>>>>>>>>>>> mon·i·ker or mon·ick·er (mon'i-k?r) n. Slang.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> A personal name or nickname.
>>>>>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Now, I would tell you from what dictionary I obtained this
>>>>>>>>>>>> definition, GrandMoff, but I would prefer you to ask me
>>>>>>>>>>>> politely. Show that you have manners and I will share the
>>>>>>>>>>>> knowledge.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I don't care. My dictionary has the same definition. Now
>>>>>>>>>>> look up the definition for "title," note the difference, and
>>>>>>>>>>> wallow in the shame of your own ignorance.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you may be onto
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something, but I highly doubt it, you don't seem to be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that swuft.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can't help it if you're obsessed with him, you spastic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thing, you!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> With who? What the **** are you babbling on about?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was referring to your freakish obsession with KM. Your
>>>>>>>>>>>>> attention span is terrible!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> KM? Who in the holy ****ing hell is KM? You are one of
>>>>>>>>>>>> those Usenet freaks everyone warns others about, aren't you?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You're not even familiar with the acronym that I've applied
to
>>>>>>>>>>> the object of your desire? You're a mess!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I see you've met yet another one from my collection of k0oKs.
>>>>>>>>>> Enjoy.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I think I own a share of Altimer, dear.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Yes dear, I know; what's mine is yours and what's yours is yours.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I already have Rhonda's mind right, Kadaitcha, now there is just
>>>>>>> you. She crumbles easily, not much fight in her. You have retard
>>>>>>> strength to you though, a little tougher.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Poor old Rhonda just goes around bleating and whining about how I
>>>>>>> am mean and not worth responding to because I drone on. LOL
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The thing is, that is what I wanted to do, methodically break her
>>>>>>> spirit and in doing so, win the game of attrition. Which I did,
>>>>>>> she as much as groveled at my feet.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Here's hoping this ain't too late, and that I haven't already
>>>>>>nominated anyone for it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>George Armstrong Custer "Kicked @$$" Award
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Given to those brave, inspiring crusaders who will keep up a lost
>>>>>>lunatic cause despite all odds, even after the enemy has won, set
up
>>>>>>their own superpower in their midst and are chugging Guinness in a
>>>>>>Kook-free world scenario.
>>>>>
>>>>> That's good, Demon, keep repeating that mantra and eventually your
>>>>> perception may actually become someone's reality. Otherwise, you
>>>>> are grasping at straws, there clearly is no ass kicking going on,
on
>>>>> either side, really.
>>>>>
>>>>> Isn't there a clause in the rules that says something like: just
>>>>> because a poster is slamming your head against the wall over and
>>>>> over doesn't mean that he or she shall be granted an award? Reread
>>>>> the guidebook. Do not abuse your nominating power, it will lose all
>>>>> value.
>>>>
>>>>Awww, that's okay, I haven't replied to you enough, of late, to
>>>>properly apply such a beating to you -- Eris knows you've never done
>>>>so to anyone. Your k00ky k'lames of victory (and ownership of K-Man),
>>>>however, are a sure sign of eligibility for this award, which, alas,
>>>>shall be for October.
>>>
>>> So, in other words, you are rock stupid and this is just how you
>>> operate? Over-exaggerated claims of ownership do not make it so.
>>> Example: Kadaitcha claims over and over in every post that I am
owned.
>>
>>And you mention him far more often than you would need to to convince
>>everyone that it's true.
>
> Convince everyone that what is true, GrandMoff?
>
>>
>>> He only does this when he runs out of bull**** to reply with. But,
>>> again, it just doesn't make it true. There has to be undeniable
>>> proof, I know the rules, *****.
>>
>>Oh, tell us all about these little rules of yours!
>
> What rules, GrandMoff?

Grizzly Antagonist from soc.fr00ts used to do this when he was being
simultaneously spanked and trolled too, and it made him look as stupid as
you do right now!

--
Grand Moff Robert Buchanan
Administrator of Death Star 6.2
Former governor of the solar system of Selus
Master of Mindy (arf)

<http://www.robertbuchanan.name/>
<http://www.simpy.com/user/rbuchanan>

Economic Left/Right: -0.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.18

[The Demon Prince of Absurdity]

On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 06:14:31 +0000, Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ did the cha-cha,
and screamed:
> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 05:37:54 GMT, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan wrote:
>>I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>news:r706i2hhtj9egh6ckajqhd1u20ei71qihl@4ax.co m by Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤:
>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 23:52:46 GMT, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan wrote:
>>>>I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>news:ive5i2h30n5pj8rllk633r4lj97cre5f12@4ax.co m by Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤:
>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 14:07:32 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man" wrote:
>>>>>>Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤, the grovelling saltboiler, yawped:
>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 13:34:26 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man" wrote:
>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤, the subaqueous fitter, dirged:
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:33:36 GMT, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It appears that somebody owns you.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This particular strand of this thread was initiated by me, about
>>>>>>>>> him.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH! PKB, you ****tard ****.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Scroll back up, Kadaitcha, you just couldn't stand not being in on
>>>>the
>>>>>>> fun that you saw this thread turning into.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But for now on, don't comment on anything I say<*****SLAP>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Try and stop me, netl0oN.
>>>>>
>>>>> Kadaitcha, I don't really want to stop you, Kook. I like seeing you
>>>>> slobber and slur and spew all your nonsense, it is fun seeing you
>>melt
>>>>> down, part of what makes you fun to toy around with.
>>>>>
>>>>> By all means, when I say "don't comment", what I really mean is for
>>>>> you to keep turning it out, it is a fun show and you are the focal
>>>>> point.
>>>>
>>>>How many ways can you paraphrase your fallacious YHBT claims?
>>>
>>> Many, many more ways, stick around.
>>
>>Nice admission. Wow. You're really stupid!
>
> Well, the bottom line is that I am not a troll. I am simply a Usenet
> participant like any other. I have no idea why anyone would ever think
> I was a troll, I would not know how to troll to save my life.

To participate is to troll, to at least some extent. There are no
wallflowers poasting to usenet (not after their second post). However,
you're being disingenuous; you may not be a highly skilled troll, but a
troll you are.

--
__________________________________________________ ______________________
Hail Eris! TM#5; COOSN-029-06-71069
Cardinal Snarky of the Fannish Inquisition
http://www6.kingdomofloathing.com/login.php
http://www.runescape.com/
No one expects the Fannish Inquisition!
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Cabal_...y_Pretzel/join
"Etymology:
Argumentum ad Septicus : argument to putrefaction. Derived from Septicum
Argumentum : putrefaction of argument.

"Septic \Sep"tic\, Septical \Sep"tic*al\
a. [L. septicus to make putrid: cf. F. septique.]
Having power to promote putrefaction. Of or relating to or
caused by putrefaction." -- Kadaitcha Man, indirectly to
Donald "Skeptic"/"Septic" Alford, in MID: <a3svh.djj.19.1@news.alt.net>

"I never fail to be amazing" -- Looney Maroon for September 2006 nominee
William Barwell's ego knows no bounds. MID:
12ggt3q3uti3t52@corp.supernews.com

"We are most nearly ourselves when we achieve the seriousness of the
child at play." -- Heraclitus

"And thats another mistake on your part. Your 'playing' games on usenet,
and I'm not playing...It has nothing to do with impressing you, it has
more to do with making sure you have the education you'll need to debate.
The debate is no fun for me if you are mentally incapable of it. I'm
giving you an opportunity to educate yourself. That's all." -- A trashy
former virus-writer turned Outer Filth doesn't know if he's playing or
working, in MID: <1159389579.179851.33970@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.c om>

[Rhonda Lea Kirk]

Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 04:47:42 GMT, The Demon Prince of Absurdity
> <absurd_number_of_nicks@hell.corn> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 03:23:47 +0000, Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ did the cha-cha,
>> and screamed:
>>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 02:47:18 GMT, The Demon Prince of Absurdity
>>> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 01:32:20 +0000, Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ did the
>>>> cha-cha,
>>>> and screamed:
>>>>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 01:11:35 GMT, The Demon Prince of Absurdity
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 21:50:20 +0000, Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ did the
>>>>>> cha-cha, and screamed:
>>>>>>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 03:15:20 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man" wrote:
>>>>>>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk, the trench and ditch digger, dilated:
>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha Man wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Grand Moff Robert Buchanan, the chuck-full marshal,
>>>>>>>>>> bull****ted:
>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>> news:ih34i2tu8faa53sikbb7dstsrd062pi7bg@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 07:11:04 GMT, Grand Moff Robert
>>>>>>>>>>>> Buchanan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:q424i299r43pu7ra0hdn3o1n4ag0kpu0at@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:48:06 GMT, Grand Moff Robert
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Buchanan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:3614i2p71j9pghflcb227a6vt1cp7af7so@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:33:36 GMT, Grand Moff Robert
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Buchanan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:6ov3i21sc8ofnn6pjc983461jfl7f90g16@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:05:29 GMT, Grand Moff Robert
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Buchanan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:c4k3i2pjhinlqtqphs8gjg8k5qodhf4uce@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del ¤:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 05:35:02 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤, the person who loans money and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> takes an arm or a leg as interest payment,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> brown-nosed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A thread chock full of trolls telling a new
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> poster stupid **** and generally acting like
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *******s.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing about that is unusual at all, only
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ironic.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The ironic part is that so many hypocrites could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> congregate so quickly all in one thread.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A lot of you are the same silly *******s who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were just telling some idiotic, long lost,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wayfaring, coming back to the fold looking for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> old Usenet buddies, sentimental sap that I was a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> troll for calling him a dumb ass and asking him
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to go away.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I bet everyone of you are as stupid as you look.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The real irony is that you're sitting in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sewer, complaining about the stench, utterly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oblivious that you're adding to it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Add to that the irony of a poster such as yourself
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that most think of as a monosyllabic twit who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vomits foul language as easily as a bum wipes his
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ass with his clean hand and the amount of irony is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> astounding.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A few points that I should address:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Twits are not, in and of themselves, monosyllabic.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However, the words they speak may be.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It appears that somebody owns you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This particular strand of this thread was initiated by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> me, about him.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That does not surprise me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now, show me something a little more bizarre than his
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> name being mentioned when he is the one being
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> discussed, GrandMoff. Oops, that's twice I have typed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your moniker in 2 different posts,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's my title, not my moniker. And there's a space
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> between "Grand" and "Moff." BTW, can you ever get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anything right?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I prefer GrandMoff, are you stating for the record that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you disapprove of GrandMoff?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, I don't mind if you make an ass of yourself.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> By eliminating one space you have determined that I am
>>>>>>>>>>>> making an ass of myself?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Well, yeah. Duh.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You really are the testy one.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BTW, it is your moniker,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You can't distinguish the difference between a title and a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> moniker. Ha, ha!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure I can, GrandMoffRobertBuchanan is your moniker, it
>>>>>>>>>>>> makes little difference if your given name is at the end
>>>>>>>>>>>> of it, this is Usenet, idiot.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for making as little sense as possible with that
>>>>>>>>>>> response.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can provide you with a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> definition of moniker if you would like for me to do
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only if the definition is taken from a legitimate source,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> such a a dictionary. Do you know what a dictionary is?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hmmm, let's see:
>>>>>>>>>>>> -------------------------------------- moniker
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Dictionary
>>>>>>>>>>>> Directory > Words > Dictionary
>>>>>>>>>>>> mon·i·ker or mon·ick·er (mon'i-k?r) n. Slang.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> A personal name or nickname.
>>>>>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Now, I would tell you from what dictionary I obtained this
>>>>>>>>>>>> definition, GrandMoff, but I would prefer you to ask me
>>>>>>>>>>>> politely. Show that you have manners and I will share the
>>>>>>>>>>>> knowledge.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I don't care. My dictionary has the same definition. Now
>>>>>>>>>>> look up the definition for "title," note the difference,
>>>>>>>>>>> and wallow in the shame of your own ignorance.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you may be onto
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something, but I highly doubt it, you don't seem to be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that swuft.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can't help it if you're obsessed with him, you spastic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thing, you!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> With who? What the **** are you babbling on about?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was referring to your freakish obsession with KM. Your
>>>>>>>>>>>>> attention span is terrible!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> KM? Who in the holy ****ing hell is KM? You are one of
>>>>>>>>>>>> those Usenet freaks everyone warns others about, aren't
>>>>>>>>>>>> you?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You're not even familiar with the acronym that I've applied
>>>>>>>>>>> to the object of your desire? You're a mess!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I see you've met yet another one from my collection of k0oKs.
>>>>>>>>>> Enjoy.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I think I own a share of Altimer, dear.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes dear, I know; what's mine is yours and what's yours is
>>>>>>>> yours.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I already have Rhonda's mind right, Kadaitcha, now there is
>>>>>>> just you. She crumbles easily, not much fight in her. You have
>>>>>>> retard strength to you though, a little tougher.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Poor old Rhonda just goes around bleating and whining about how
>>>>>>> I am mean and not worth responding to because I drone on. LOL
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The thing is, that is what I wanted to do, methodically break
>>>>>>> her spirit and in doing so, win the game of attrition. Which I
>>>>>>> did, she as much as groveled at my feet.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here's hoping this ain't too late, and that I haven't already
>>>>>> nominated anyone for it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> George Armstrong Custer "Kicked @$$" Award
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Given to those brave, inspiring crusaders who will keep up a lost
>>>>>> lunatic cause despite all odds, even after the enemy has won,
>>>>>> set up their own superpower in their midst and are chugging
>>>>>> Guinness in a Kook-free world scenario.
>>>>>
>>>>> That's good, Demon, keep repeating that mantra and eventually your
>>>>> perception may actually become someone's reality. Otherwise, you
>>>>> are grasping at straws, there clearly is no ass kicking going on,
>>>>> on either side, really.
>>>>>
>>>>> Isn't there a clause in the rules that says something like: just
>>>>> because a poster is slamming your head against the wall over and
>>>>> over doesn't mean that he or she shall be granted an award?
>>>>> Reread the guidebook. Do not abuse your nominating power, it will
>>>>> lose all value.
>>>>
>>>> Awww, that's okay, I haven't replied to you enough, of late, to
>>>> properly apply such a beating to you -- Eris knows you've never
>>>> done so to anyone. Your k00ky k'lames of victory (and ownership of
>>>> K-Man), however, are a sure sign of eligibility for this award,
>>>> which, alas, shall be for October.
>>>
>>> So, in other words, you are rock stupid and this is just how you
>>> operate? Over-exaggerated claims of ownership do not make it so.
>>> Example: Kadaitcha claims over and over in every post that I am
>>> owned. He only does this when he runs out of bull**** to reply
>>> with. But, again, it just doesn't make it true. There has to be
>>> undeniable proof, I know the rules, *****.
>>
>> Bloviation to avoid admitting a ****-up noted. You made the k'lame of
>> ownership.
>
> You are simply sidestepping the base issue of dubious claimants of
> ownership. In order to play this game that you want to play, I will
> require "at least" one statement by myself that I owned anyone. You
> will have to provide this statement, supposedly made by myself, with
> full headers.
>
> Otherwise, you are standing on shaky ground.
>
> Altie

Here's one. I have to go back and dig out the rest, but if you continue
to dispute your nomination, I'll be happy to do it.

I believe you've claimed ownership of Mr. Plow and me, as well.

X-Gerbil-Hamster-Info: Score=0 ScoreLoad=0 ScoreSave=0
Received=20061003040805
Xref: localhost 24hoursupport.helpdesk:7520 alt.comp.anti-virus:2193
alt.comp.os.windows-xp:764 alt.comp.virus:2266 alt.os.windows-xp:3283
alt.privacy.spyware:1588 alt.usenet.kooks:15236 alt.windows-xp:983
Path:
blackhelicopter.databasix.com!news.glorb.com!newsh ub.sdsu.edu!elnk-nf2-pas!newsfeed.earthlink.net!stamper.news.pas.earthl ink.net!newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net.POSTED!70 9dc226!not-for-mail
From: Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ <Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>
Newsgroups:
24hoursupport.helpdesk,alt.comp.anti-virus,alt.comp.os.windows-xp,alt.comp.virus,alt.os.windows-xp,alt.privacy.spyware,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.window s-xp
Subject: Re: Tell me about this newsgroup
Keywords: Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤
Summary: Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤
Sender: Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@cad.com
Organization: Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤
Reply-To: Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com
Expires: Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤
Message-ID: <4964i2hr36kc4picaguliodngc5rthdnhk@4ax.com>
References: <Xns985112546E913grandmoffdeathstarga@66.133.129.7 1>
<q424i299r43pu7ra0hdn3o1n4ag0kpu0at@4ax.com>
<Xns98511638E3E9Bgrandmoffdeathstarga@66.133.129.7 1>
<ih34i2tu8faa53sikbb7dstsrd062pi7bg@4ax.com>
<Xns98511A94F197grandmoffdeathstarga@66.133.129.71 >
<5tbw95$zvs$o@wretched-pendulums.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.0/32.1071
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 185
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 08:06:55 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 4.88.79.124
X-Complaints-To: abuse@earthlink.net
X-Trace: newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net 1159862815 4.88.79.124 (Tue,
03 Oct 2006 01:06:55 PDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 01:06:55 PDT
X-Old-Xref: blackhelicopter.databasix.com 24hoursupport.helpdesk:100333
alt.comp.anti-virus:12570 alt.comp.os.windows-xp:4122
alt.comp.virus:9334 alt.os.windows-xp:27393 alt.privacy.spyware:10965
alt.usenet.kooks:199914 alt.windows-xp:8362

On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 13:37:20 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man"
<****-you.ya.****@kiss-my-big-black-ass.com> wrote:

>Grand Moff Robert Buchanan <grandmoff@deathstar.galacticempire>, the
>chuck-full marshal, bull****ted:
>
>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>> news:ih34i2tu8faa53sikbb7dstsrd062pi7bg@4ax.com by Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤
>> <Ctrl ¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>:
>>
>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 07:11:04 GMT, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan
>>> <grandmoff@deathstar.galacticempire> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>> news:q424i299r43pu7ra0hdn3o1n4ag0kpu0at@4ax.com by Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤
>>>> <Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:48:06 GMT, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan
>>>>> <grandmoff@deathstar.galacticempire> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>> news:3614i2p71j9pghflcb227a6vt1cp7af7so@4ax.com by
>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤
>>>>>> <Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:33:36 GMT, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan
>>>>>>> <grandmoff@deathstar.galacticempire> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>> news:6ov3i21sc8ofnn6pjc983461jfl7f90g16@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ <Ctrl ¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:05:29 GMT, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan
>>>>>>>>> <grandmoff@deathstar.galacticempire> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>> news:c4k3i2pjhinlqtqphs8gjg8k5qodhf4uce@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del ¤ <Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 05:35:02 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man"
>>>>>>>>>>> <****-you.ya.****@kiss-my-big-black-ass.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ <Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>, the person who
>>>>>>>>>>>> loans money and takes an arm or a leg as interest payment,
>>>>>>>>>>>> brown-nosed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> A thread chock full of trolls telling a new poster stupid
>>>>>>>>>>>>> **** and generally acting like *******s.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing about that is unusual at all, only ironic.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The ironic part is that so many hypocrites could
>>>>>>>>>>>>> congregate so quickly all in one thread.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> A lot of you are the same silly *******s who were just
>>>>>>>>>>>>> telling some idiotic, long lost, wayfaring, coming back to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the fold looking for old Usenet buddies, sentimental sap
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that I was a troll for calling him a dumb ass and asking
>>>>>>>>>>>>> him to go away.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I bet everyone of you are as stupid as you look.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The real irony is that you're sitting in the sewer,
>>>>>>>>>>>> complaining about the stench, utterly oblivious that you're
>>>>>>>>>>>> adding to it.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Add to that the irony of a poster such as yourself that most
>>>>>>>>>>> think of as a monosyllabic twit who vomits foul language as
>>>>>>>>>>> easily as a bum wipes his ass with his clean hand and the
>>>>>>>>>>> amount of irony is astounding.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> A few points that I should address:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> -Twits are not, in and of themselves, monosyllabic. However,
>>>>>>>>>> the words they speak may be.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It appears that somebody owns you.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This particular strand of this thread was initiated by me, about
>>>>>>> him.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That does not surprise me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Now, show me something a little more bizarre than his name being
>>>>>>> mentioned when he is the one being discussed, GrandMoff. Oops,
>>>>>>> that's twice I have typed your moniker in 2 different posts,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's my title, not my moniker. And there's a space between
>>>>>> "Grand" and "Moff." BTW, can you ever get anything right?
>>>>>
>>>>> I prefer GrandMoff, are you stating for the record that you
>>>>> disapprove of GrandMoff?
>>>>
>>>> No, I don't mind if you make an ass of yourself.
>>>
>>> By eliminating one space you have determined that I am making an ass
>>> of myself?
>>
>> Well, yeah. Duh.
>>
>>> You really are the testy one.
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>>>>> BTW, it is your moniker,
>>>>
>>>> You can't distinguish the difference between a title and a moniker.
>> Ha,
>>>> ha!
>>>
>>> Sure I can, GrandMoffRobertBuchanan is your moniker, it makes little
>>> difference if your given name is at the end of it, this is Usenet,
>>> idiot.
>>
>> Thanks for making as little sense as possible with that response.
>>
>>>>> I can provide you with a
>>>>> definition of moniker if you would like for me to do that.
>>>>
>>>> Only if the definition is taken from a legitimate source, such a a
>>>> dictionary. Do you know what a dictionary is?
>>>
>>>
>>> Hmmm, let's see:
>>> --------------------------------------
>>> moniker
>>>
>>> Dictionary
>>> Directory > Words > Dictionary
>>> mon·i·ker or mon·ick·er (mon'i-k?r)
>>> n. Slang.
>>>
>>> A personal name or nickname.
>>> --------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Now, I would tell you from what dictionary I obtained this
>>> definition, GrandMoff, but I would prefer you to ask me politely.
>>> Show that you have manners and I will share the knowledge.
>>
>> I don't care. My dictionary has the same definition. Now look up
>> the
>> definition for "title," note the difference, and wallow in the shame
>> of your own ignorance.
>>
>>>>>>> you may be onto
>>>>>>> something, but I highly doubt it, you don't seem to be that
>>>>>>> swuft.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I can't help it if you're obsessed with him, you spastic thing,
>>>>>> you!
>>>>>
>>>>> With who? What the **** are you babbling on about?
>>>>
>>>> I was referring to your freakish obsession with KM. Your attention
>>>> span is terrible!
>>>
>>> KM? Who in the holy ****ing hell is KM? You are one of those
>>> Usenet
>>> freaks everyone warns others about, aren't you?
>>
>> You're not even familiar with the acronym that I've applied to the
>> object of your desire? You're a mess!
>
>I see you've met yet another one from my collection of k0oKs. Enjoy.

Kadaitcha, you are my kook. Remember, you ran off last time we had a
little sparring session. I hurt your monkey like feelings and you got
mad and went away.

Tonight, you just had to reacquaint yourself with me for some reason,
I don't know why. But, it will end just the same as last time, me
pissing you off and you getting mad and not wanting to play anymore.

Altie

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk

Happiness limits the amount of suffering one is
willing to inflict on others. Phèdre nó Delaunay

[Grand Moff Robert Buchanan]

I will now respond to a post accessible as
news:dap6i25e9lc90713scobndf3tslt4u4chr@4ax.com by Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤
<Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>:

> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 07:01:59 GMT, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan
> <grandmoff@deathstar.galacticempire> wrote:
>
>>I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>news:9kl6i21k8bl6k1crmlhfgjjndur5li9ppq@4ax.co m by Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤
>><Ctrl ¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>:
>>
>>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 06:24:24 GMT, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan
>>> <grandmoff@deathstar.galacticempire> wrote:
>>>
>>>>I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>news:hq96i2dbghvh48i0bimarkvpgk1cbdejkm@4ax.co m by Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤
>>>><Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 02:47:18 GMT, The Demon Prince of Absurdity
>>>>> <absurd_number_of_nicks@hell.corn> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 01:32:20 +0000, Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ did the
>>>>>>cha-cha, and screamed:
>>>>>>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 01:11:35 GMT, The Demon Prince of Absurdity
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 21:50:20 +0000, Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ did the cha-
>>cha,
>>>>>>>>and screamed:
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 03:15:20 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man" wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>Rhonda Lea Kirk, the trench and ditch digger, dilated:
>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha Man wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Grand Moff Robert Buchanan, the chuck-full marshal,
>>>>>>>>>>>> bull****ted:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:ih34i2tu8faa53sikbb7dstsrd062pi7bg@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 07:11:04 GMT, Grand Moff Robert
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Buchanan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:q424i299r43pu7ra0hdn3o1n4ag0kpu0at@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:48:06 GMT, Grand Moff Robert
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Buchanan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:3614i2p71j9pghflcb227a6vt1cp7af7so@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:33:36 GMT, Grand Moff Robert
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Buchanan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:6ov3i21sc8ofnn6pjc983461jfl7f90g16@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:05:29 GMT, Grand Moff Robert
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Buchanan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:c4k3i2pjhinlqtqphs8gjg8k5qodhf4uce@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del ¤:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 05:35:02 +0545, "Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Man" wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤, the person who loans money and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> takes an arm or a leg as interest payment,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> brown-nosed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A thread chock full of trolls telling a new
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> poster stupid **** and generally acting like
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *******s.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing about that is unusual at all, only
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ironic.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The ironic part is that so many hypocrites
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could congregate so quickly all in one thread.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A lot of you are the same silly *******s who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were just telling some idiotic, long lost,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wayfaring, coming back to the fold looking for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> old Usenet buddies, sentimental sap that I was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a troll for calling him a dumb ass and asking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> him to go away.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I bet everyone of you are as stupid as you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> look.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The real irony is that you're sitting in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sewer, complaining about the stench, utterly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oblivious
>>that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you're adding to it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Add to that the irony of a poster such as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yourself that most think of as a monosyllabic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> twit who vomits foul language as easily as a bum
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wipes his ass with his clean hand and the amount
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of irony is
>>astounding.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A few points that I should address:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Twits are not, in and of themselves,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> monosyllabic. However, the words they speak may
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It appears that somebody owns you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This particular strand of this thread was initiated
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by me, about him.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That does not surprise me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now, show me something a little more bizarre than his
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> name being mentioned when he is the one being
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> discussed, GrandMoff. Oops, that's twice I have typed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your moniker in 2 different posts,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's my title, not my moniker. And there's a space
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> between "Grand" and "Moff." BTW, can you ever get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anything right?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I prefer GrandMoff, are you stating for the record that
>>you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> disapprove of GrandMoff?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, I don't mind if you make an ass of yourself.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> By eliminating one space you have determined that I am
>>making
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an ass of myself?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, yeah. Duh.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You really are the testy one.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BTW, it is your moniker,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You can't distinguish the difference between a title and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a moniker. Ha, ha!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure I can, GrandMoffRobertBuchanan is your moniker, it
>>makes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> little difference if your given name is at the end of it,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this is Usenet, idiot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for making as little sense as possible with that
>>>>>>>>>>>>> response.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can provide you with a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> definition of moniker if you would like for me to do
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only if the definition is taken from a legitimate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> source, such a a dictionary. Do you know what a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dictionary is?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hmmm, let's see:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -------------------------------------- moniker
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dictionary
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Directory > Words > Dictionary
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mon·i·ker or mon·ick·er (mon'i-k?r) n. Slang.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A personal name or nickname.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now, I would tell you from what dictionary I obtained
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this definition, GrandMoff, but I would prefer you to ask
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> me politely. Show that you have manners and I will share
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the knowledge.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't care. My dictionary has the same definition. Now
>>>>>>>>>>>>> look up the definition for "title," note the difference,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and wallow in the shame of your own ignorance.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you may be onto
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something, but I highly doubt it, you don't seem to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be that swuft.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can't help it if you're obsessed with him, you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> spastic thing, you!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> With who? What the **** are you babbling on about?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was referring to your freakish obsession with KM.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your attention span is terrible!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> KM? Who in the holy ****ing hell is KM? You are one of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those Usenet freaks everyone warns others about, aren't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're not even familiar with the acronym that I've
>>>>>>>>>>>>> applied
>>to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the object of your desire? You're a mess!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I see you've met yet another one from my collection of
>>>>>>>>>>>> k0oKs. Enjoy.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I think I own a share of Altimer, dear.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Yes dear, I know; what's mine is yours and what's yours is
>>>>>>>>>>yours.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I already have Rhonda's mind right, Kadaitcha, now there is
>>>>>>>>> just you. She crumbles easily, not much fight in her. You
>>>>>>>>> have retard strength to you though, a little tougher.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Poor old Rhonda just goes around bleating and whining about
>>>>>>>>> how I am mean and not worth responding to because I drone on.
>>>>>>>>> LOL
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The thing is, that is what I wanted to do, methodically break
>>>>>>>>> her spirit and in doing so, win the game of attrition. Which
>>>>>>>>> I did, she as much as groveled at my feet.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Here's hoping this ain't too late, and that I haven't already
>>>>>>>>nominated anyone for it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>George Armstrong Custer "Kicked @$$" Award
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Given to those brave, inspiring crusaders who will keep up a
>>>>>>>>lost lunatic cause despite all odds, even after the enemy has
>>>>>>>>won, set
>>up
>>>>>>>>their own superpower in their midst and are chugging Guinness in
>>>>>>>>a Kook-free world scenario.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's good, Demon, keep repeating that mantra and eventually
>>>>>>> your perception may actually become someone's reality.
>>>>>>> Otherwise, you are grasping at straws, there clearly is no ass
>>>>>>> kicking going on,
>>on
>>>>>>> either side, really.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Isn't there a clause in the rules that says something like: just
>>>>>>> because a poster is slamming your head against the wall over and
>>>>>>> over doesn't mean that he or she shall be granted an award?
>>>>>>> Reread the guidebook. Do not abuse your nominating power, it
>>>>>>> will lose all value.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Awww, that's okay, I haven't replied to you enough, of late, to
>>>>>>properly apply such a beating to you -- Eris knows you've never
>>>>>>done so to anyone. Your k00ky k'lames of victory (and ownership of
>>>>>>K-Man), however, are a sure sign of eligibility for this award,
>>>>>>which, alas, shall be for October.
>>>>>
>>>>> So, in other words, you are rock stupid and this is just how you
>>>>> operate? Over-exaggerated claims of ownership do not make it so.
>>>>> Example: Kadaitcha claims over and over in every post that I am
>>owned.
>>>>
>>>>And you mention him far more often than you would need to to
>>>>convince everyone that it's true.
>>>
>>> Convince everyone that what is true, GrandMoff?
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> He only does this when he runs out of bull**** to reply with.
>>>>> But, again, it just doesn't make it true. There has to be
>>>>> undeniable proof, I know the rules, *****.
>>>>
>>>>Oh, tell us all about these little rules of yours!
>>>
>>> What rules, GrandMoff?
>>
>>Grizzly Antagonist from soc.fr00ts used to do this when he was being
>>simultaneously spanked and trolled too, and it made him look as stupid
>>as you do right now!
>
> Ugh, I have no idea who you are talking about GrandMoff. All I know
> is that you are fun to yank around, is there something wrong with
> admitting that?

If you ever learn the difference between actual trolling and the kooky
post-humping that you persistently engage in, you might actually acquire
something resembling a clue.

--
Grand Moff Robert Buchanan
Administrator of Death Star 6.2
Former governor of the solar system of Selus
Master of Mindy (arf)

<http://www.robertbuchanan.name/>
<http://www.simpy.com/user/rbuchanan>

Economic Left/Right: -0.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.18

[Kadaitcha Man]

Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ <Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>, the backwoods proctologist,
clamoured:

> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 02:47:18 GMT, The Demon Prince of Absurdity
> <absurd_number_of_nicks@hell.corn> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 01:32:20 +0000, Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ did the cha-cha,
>> and screamed:
>>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 01:11:35 GMT, The Demon Prince of Absurdity
>>> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 21:50:20 +0000, Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ did the
>>>> cha-cha,
>>>> and screamed:
>>>>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 03:15:20 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man" wrote:
>>>>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk, the trench and ditch digger, dilated:
>>>>>>> Kadaitcha Man wrote:
>>>>>>>> Grand Moff Robert Buchanan, the chuck-full marshal,
>>>>>>>> bull****ted:
>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>> news:ih34i2tu8faa53sikbb7dstsrd062pi7bg@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤:
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 07:11:04 GMT, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>> news:q424i299r43pu7ra0hdn3o1n4ag0kpu0at@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:48:06 GMT, Grand Moff Robert
>>>>>>>>>>>> Buchanan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:3614i2p71j9pghflcb227a6vt1cp7af7so@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:33:36 GMT, Grand Moff Robert
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Buchanan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:6ov3i21sc8ofnn6pjc983461jfl7f90g16@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:05:29 GMT, Grand Moff Robert
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Buchanan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:c4k3i2pjhinlqtqphs8gjg8k5qodhf4uce@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del ¤:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 05:35:02 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤, the person who loans money and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> takes an arm or a leg as interest payment,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> brown-nosed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A thread chock full of trolls telling a new poster
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stupid **** and generally acting like *******s.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing about that is unusual at all, only ironic.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The ironic part is that so many hypocrites could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> congregate so quickly all in one thread.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A lot of you are the same silly *******s who were
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just telling some idiotic, long lost, wayfaring,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> coming back to the fold looking for old Usenet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> buddies, sentimental sap that I was a troll for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> calling him a dumb ass and asking him to go away.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I bet everyone of you are as stupid as you look.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The real irony is that you're sitting in the sewer,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> complaining about the stench, utterly oblivious that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you're adding to it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Add to that the irony of a poster such as yourself
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that most think of as a monosyllabic twit who vomits
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> foul language as easily as a bum wipes his ass with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> his clean hand and the amount of irony is astounding.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A few points that I should address:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Twits are not, in and of themselves, monosyllabic.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However, the words they speak may be.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It appears that somebody owns you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This particular strand of this thread was initiated by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> me, about him.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> That does not surprise me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now, show me something a little more bizarre than his
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> name being mentioned when he is the one being discussed,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GrandMoff. Oops, that's twice I have typed your moniker
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in 2 different posts,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's my title, not my moniker. And there's a space
>>>>>>>>>>>>> between "Grand" and "Moff." BTW, can you ever get
>>>>>>>>>>>>> anything right?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I prefer GrandMoff, are you stating for the record that you
>>>>>>>>>>>> disapprove of GrandMoff?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> No, I don't mind if you make an ass of yourself.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> By eliminating one space you have determined that I am
>>>>>>>>>> making an ass of myself?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Well, yeah. Duh.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You really are the testy one.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> BTW, it is your moniker,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You can't distinguish the difference between a title and a
>>>>>>>>>>> moniker. Ha, ha!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Sure I can, GrandMoffRobertBuchanan is your moniker, it makes
>>>>>>>>>> little difference if your given name is at the end of it,
>>>>>>>>>> this is Usenet, idiot.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks for making as little sense as possible with that
>>>>>>>>> response.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I can provide you with a
>>>>>>>>>>>> definition of moniker if you would like for me to do that.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Only if the definition is taken from a legitimate source,
>>>>>>>>>>> such a a dictionary. Do you know what a dictionary is?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hmmm, let's see:
>>>>>>>>>> -------------------------------------- moniker
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Dictionary
>>>>>>>>>> Directory > Words > Dictionary
>>>>>>>>>> mon·i·ker or mon·ick·er (mon'i-k?r) n. Slang.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> A personal name or nickname.
>>>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Now, I would tell you from what dictionary I obtained this
>>>>>>>>>> definition, GrandMoff, but I would prefer you to ask me
>>>>>>>>>> politely. Show that you have manners and I will share the
>>>>>>>>>> knowledge.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I don't care. My dictionary has the same definition. Now
>>>>>>>>> look up the definition for "title," note the difference, and
>>>>>>>>> wallow in the shame of your own ignorance.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you may be onto
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something, but I highly doubt it, you don't seem to be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that swuft.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can't help it if you're obsessed with him, you spastic
>>>>>>>>>>>>> thing, you!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> With who? What the **** are you babbling on about?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I was referring to your freakish obsession with KM. Your
>>>>>>>>>>> attention span is terrible!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> KM? Who in the holy ****ing hell is KM? You are one of
>>>>>>>>>> those Usenet freaks everyone warns others about, aren't you?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You're not even familiar with the acronym that I've applied
>>>>>>>>> to the object of your desire? You're a mess!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I see you've met yet another one from my collection of k0oKs.
>>>>>>>> Enjoy.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think I own a share of Altimer, dear.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes dear, I know; what's mine is yours and what's yours is yours.
>>>>>
>>>>> I already have Rhonda's mind right, Kadaitcha, now there is just
>>>>> you. She crumbles easily, not much fight in her. You have retard
>>>>> strength to you though, a little tougher.
>>>>>
>>>>> Poor old Rhonda just goes around bleating and whining about how I
>>>>> am mean and not worth responding to because I drone on. LOL
>>>>>
>>>>> The thing is, that is what I wanted to do, methodically break her
>>>>> spirit and in doing so, win the game of attrition. Which I did,
>>>>> she as much as groveled at my feet.
>>>>
>>>> Here's hoping this ain't too late, and that I haven't already
>>>> nominated anyone for it.
>>>>
>>>> George Armstrong Custer "Kicked @$$" Award
>>>>
>>>> Given to those brave, inspiring crusaders who will keep up a lost
>>>> lunatic cause despite all odds, even after the enemy has won, set
>>>> up their own superpower in their midst and are chugging Guinness
>>>> in a Kook-free world scenario.
>>>
>>> That's good, Demon, keep repeating that mantra and eventually your
>>> perception may actually become someone's reality. Otherwise, you
>>> are grasping at straws, there clearly is no ass kicking going on,
>>> on either side, really.
>>>
>>> Isn't there a clause in the rules that says something like: just
>>> because a poster is slamming your head against the wall over and
>>> over doesn't mean that he or she shall be granted an award? Reread
>>> the guidebook. Do not abuse your nominating power, it will lose all
>>> value.
>>
>> Awww, that's okay, I haven't replied to you enough, of late, to
>> properly apply such a beating to you -- Eris knows you've never done
>> so to anyone. Your k00ky k'lames of victory (and ownership of
>> K-Man), however, are a sure sign of eligibility for this award,
>> which, alas, shall be for October.
>
> So, in other words, you are rock stupid and this is just how you
> operate? Over-exaggerated claims of ownership do not make it so.
> Example: Kadaitcha claims over and over in every post that I am owned.

Searched all groups
Your search - kadaitcha Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com owned - did not match any
documents

Seems you're delusional, you ****tard ****.

> He only does this when he runs out of bull**** to reply with. But,
> again, it just doesn't make it true. There has to be undeniable
> proof, I know the rules, *****.

Undeniable proof, like this:

Searched all groups
Your search - kadaitcha Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com owned - did not match any
documents

> Altimer



--
alt.usenet.kooks - Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker:
September 2005 and April 2006

"K-Man's particular genius, however, lies not merely in his humour,
but his ability to make posters who had previously seemed reasonably
well-balanced turn into foaming, frothing, death threat-uttering
maniacs" - Snarky, Demon Lord of Confusion

Thou princox. Thou *****son malt-horse drudge.

[Rhonda Lea Kirk]

Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ wrote:
>Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ wrote:
>>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 04:47:42 GMT, The Demon Prince of Absurdity
>>> <absurd_number_of_nicks@hell.corn> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 03:23:47 +0000, Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ did the
>>>> cha-cha,
>>>> and screamed:
>>>>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 02:47:18 GMT, The Demon Prince of Absurdity
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 01:32:20 +0000, Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ did the
>>>>>> cha-cha,
>>>>>> and screamed:
>>>>>>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 01:11:35 GMT, The Demon Prince of Absurdity
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 21:50:20 +0000, Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ did the
>>>>>>>> cha-cha, and screamed:
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 03:15:20 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man" wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk, the trench and ditch digger, dilated:
>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha Man wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Grand Moff Robert Buchanan, the chuck-full marshal,
>>>>>>>>>>>> bull****ted:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:ih34i2tu8faa53sikbb7dstsrd062pi7bg@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 07:11:04 GMT, Grand Moff Robert
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Buchanan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:q424i299r43pu7ra0hdn3o1n4ag0kpu0at@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:48:06 GMT, Grand Moff Robert
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Buchanan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:3614i2p71j9pghflcb227a6vt1cp7af7so@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:33:36 GMT, Grand Moff Robert
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Buchanan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:6ov3i21sc8ofnn6pjc983461jfl7f90g16@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:05:29 GMT, Grand Moff Robert
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Buchanan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:c4k3i2pjhinlqtqphs8gjg8k5qodhf4uce@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del ¤:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 05:35:02 +0545, "Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Man" wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤, the person who loans money and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> takes an arm or a leg as interest payment,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> brown-nosed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A thread chock full of trolls telling a new
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> poster stupid **** and generally acting like
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *******s.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing about that is unusual at all, only
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ironic.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The ironic part is that so many hypocrites
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> congregate so quickly all in one thread.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A lot of you are the same silly *******s who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were just telling some idiotic, long lost,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wayfaring, coming back to the fold looking for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> old Usenet buddies, sentimental sap that I was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> troll for calling him a dumb ass and asking him
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to go away.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I bet everyone of you are as stupid as you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> look.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The real irony is that you're sitting in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sewer, complaining about the stench, utterly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oblivious that you're adding to it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Add to that the irony of a poster such as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yourself
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that most think of as a monosyllabic twit who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vomits foul language as easily as a bum wipes his
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ass with his clean hand and the amount of irony
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> astounding.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A few points that I should address:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Twits are not, in and of themselves,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> monosyllabic.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However, the words they speak may be.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It appears that somebody owns you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This particular strand of this thread was initiated
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> me, about him.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That does not surprise me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now, show me something a little more bizarre than his
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> name being mentioned when he is the one being
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> discussed, GrandMoff. Oops, that's twice I have typed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your moniker in 2 different posts,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's my title, not my moniker. And there's a space
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> between "Grand" and "Moff." BTW, can you ever get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anything right?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I prefer GrandMoff, are you stating for the record that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you disapprove of GrandMoff?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, I don't mind if you make an ass of yourself.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> By eliminating one space you have determined that I am
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> making an ass of myself?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, yeah. Duh.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You really are the testy one.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BTW, it is your moniker,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You can't distinguish the difference between a title and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a moniker. Ha, ha!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure I can, GrandMoffRobertBuchanan is your moniker, it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> makes little difference if your given name is at the end
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of it, this is Usenet, idiot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for making as little sense as possible with that
>>>>>>>>>>>>> response.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can provide you with a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> definition of moniker if you would like for me to do
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only if the definition is taken from a legitimate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> source,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> such a a dictionary. Do you know what a dictionary is?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hmmm, let's see:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -------------------------------------- moniker
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dictionary
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Directory > Words > Dictionary
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mon·i·ker or mon·ick·er (mon'i-k?r) n. Slang.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A personal name or nickname.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now, I would tell you from what dictionary I obtained
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> definition, GrandMoff, but I would prefer you to ask me
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> politely. Show that you have manners and I will share the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> knowledge.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't care. My dictionary has the same definition. Now
>>>>>>>>>>>>> look up the definition for "title," note the difference,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and wallow in the shame of your own ignorance.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you may be onto
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something, but I highly doubt it, you don't seem to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that swuft.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can't help it if you're obsessed with him, you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> spastic thing, you!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> With who? What the **** are you babbling on about?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was referring to your freakish obsession with KM.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> attention span is terrible!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> KM? Who in the holy ****ing hell is KM? You are one of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those Usenet freaks everyone warns others about, aren't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're not even familiar with the acronym that I've
>>>>>>>>>>>>> applied
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the object of your desire? You're a mess!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I see you've met yet another one from my collection of
>>>>>>>>>>>> k0oKs. Enjoy.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I think I own a share of Altimer, dear.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Yes dear, I know; what's mine is yours and what's yours is
>>>>>>>>>> yours.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I already have Rhonda's mind right, Kadaitcha, now there is
>>>>>>>>> just you. She crumbles easily, not much fight in her. You
>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>> retard strength to you though, a little tougher.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Poor old Rhonda just goes around bleating and whining about
>>>>>>>>> how
>>>>>>>>> I am mean and not worth responding to because I drone on. LOL
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The thing is, that is what I wanted to do, methodically break
>>>>>>>>> her spirit and in doing so, win the game of attrition. Which
>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>> did, she as much as groveled at my feet.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Here's hoping this ain't too late, and that I haven't already
>>>>>>>> nominated anyone for it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> George Armstrong Custer "Kicked @$$" Award
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Given to those brave, inspiring crusaders who will keep up a
>>>>>>>> lost lunatic cause despite all odds, even after the enemy has
>>>>>>>> won, set up their own superpower in their midst and are
>>>>>>>> chugging
>>>>>>>> Guinness in a Kook-free world scenario.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's good, Demon, keep repeating that mantra and eventually
>>>>>>> your perception may actually become someone's reality.
>>>>>>> Otherwise, you are grasping at straws, there clearly is no ass
>>>>>>> kicking going on, on either side, really.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Isn't there a clause in the rules that says something like: just
>>>>>>> because a poster is slamming your head against the wall over and
>>>>>>> over doesn't mean that he or she shall be granted an award?
>>>>>>> Reread the guidebook. Do not abuse your nominating power, it
>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>> lose all value.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Awww, that's okay, I haven't replied to you enough, of late, to
>>>>>> properly apply such a beating to you -- Eris knows you've never
>>>>>> done so to anyone. Your k00ky k'lames of victory (and ownership
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> K-Man), however, are a sure sign of eligibility for this award,
>>>>>> which, alas, shall be for October.
>>>>>
>>>>> So, in other words, you are rock stupid and this is just how you
>>>>> operate? Over-exaggerated claims of ownership do not make it so.
>>>>> Example: Kadaitcha claims over and over in every post that I am
>>>>> owned. He only does this when he runs out of bull**** to reply
>>>>> with. But, again, it just doesn't make it true. There has to be
>>>>> undeniable proof, I know the rules, *****.
>>>>
>>>> Bloviation to avoid admitting a ****-up noted. You made the k'lame
>>>> of ownership.
>>>
>>> You are simply sidestepping the base issue of dubious claimants of
>>> ownership. In order to play this game that you want to play, I will
>>> require "at least" one statement by myself that I owned anyone. You
>>> will have to provide this statement, supposedly made by myself, with
>>> full headers.
>>>
>>> Otherwise, you are standing on shaky ground.
>>>
>>> Altie
>>
>> Here's one. I have to go back and dig out the rest, but if you
>> continue to dispute your nomination, I'll be happy to do it.
>>
>> I believe you've claimed ownership of Mr. Plow and me, as well.
>>
<begin proof>
> X-Gerbil-Hamster-Info: Score=0 ScoreLoad=0 ScoreSave=0
> Received=20061003040805
> Xref: localhost 24hoursupport.helpdesk:7520 alt.comp.anti-virus:2193
> alt.comp.os.windows-xp:764 alt.comp.virus:2266 alt.os.windows-xp:3283
> alt.privacy.spyware:1588 alt.usenet.kooks:15236 alt.windows-xp:983
> Path:
> blackhelicopter.databasix.com!news.glorb.com!newsh ub.sdsu.edu!elnk-nf2-pas!newsfeed.earthlink.net!stamper.news.pas.earthl ink.net!newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net.POSTED!70 9dc226!not-for-mail
> From: Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ <Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>
> Newsgroups:
> 24hoursupport.helpdesk,alt.comp.anti-virus,alt.comp.os.windows-xp,alt.comp.virus,alt.os.windows-xp,alt.privacy.spyware,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.window s-xp
> Subject: Re: Tell me about this newsgroup
> Keywords: Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤
> Summary: Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤
> Sender: Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@cad.com
> Organization: Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤
> Reply-To: Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com
> Expires: Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤
> Message-ID: <4964i2hr36kc4picaguliodngc5rthdnhk@4ax.com>
> References: <Xns985112546E913grandmoffdeathstarga@66.133.129.7 1>
> <q424i299r43pu7ra0hdn3o1n4ag0kpu0at@4ax.com>
> <Xns98511638E3E9Bgrandmoffdeathstarga@66.133.129.7 1>
> <ih34i2tu8faa53sikbb7dstsrd062pi7bg@4ax.com>
> <Xns98511A94F197grandmoffdeathstarga@66.133.129.71 >
> <5tbw95$zvs$o@wretched-pendulums.com>
> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.0/32.1071
> X-No-Archive: yes
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> Lines: 185
> Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 08:06:55 GMT
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 4.88.79.124
> X-Complaints-To: abuse@earthlink.net
> X-Trace: newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net 1159862815 4.88.79.124 (Tue,
> 03 Oct 2006 01:06:55 PDT)
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 01:06:55 PDT
> X-Old-Xref: blackhelicopter.databasix.com
> 24hoursupport.helpdesk:100333 alt.comp.anti-virus:12570
> alt.comp.os.windows-xp:4122 alt.comp.virus:9334
> alt.os.windows-xp:27393 alt.privacy.spyware:10965
> alt.usenet.kooks:199914 alt.windows-xp:8362
>
> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 13:37:20 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man"
> <****-you.ya.****@kiss-my-big-black-ass.com> wrote:
>
>> Grand Moff Robert Buchanan <grandmoff@deathstar.galacticempire>, the
>> chuck-full marshal, bull****ted:
>>
>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>> news:ih34i2tu8faa53sikbb7dstsrd062pi7bg@4ax.com by Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤
>>> <Ctrl ¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 07:11:04 GMT, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan
>>>> <grandmoff@deathstar.galacticempire> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>> news:q424i299r43pu7ra0hdn3o1n4ag0kpu0at@4ax.com by Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤
>>>>> <Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:48:06 GMT, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan
>>>>>> <grandmoff@deathstar.galacticempire> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>> news:3614i2p71j9pghflcb227a6vt1cp7af7so@4ax.com by
>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤
>>>>>>> <Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:33:36 GMT, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan
>>>>>>>> <grandmoff@deathstar.galacticempire> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>> news:6ov3i21sc8ofnn6pjc983461jfl7f90g16@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ <Ctrl ¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:05:29 GMT, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan
>>>>>>>>>> <grandmoff@deathstar.galacticempire> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>> news:c4k3i2pjhinlqtqphs8gjg8k5qodhf4uce@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del ¤ <Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 05:35:02 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man"
>>>>>>>>>>>> <****-you.ya.****@kiss-my-big-black-ass.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ <Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>, the person who
>>>>>>>>>>>>> loans money and takes an arm or a leg as interest payment,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> brown-nosed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A thread chock full of trolls telling a new poster stupid
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> **** and generally acting like *******s.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing about that is unusual at all, only ironic.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The ironic part is that so many hypocrites could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> congregate so quickly all in one thread.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A lot of you are the same silly *******s who were just
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> telling some idiotic, long lost, wayfaring, coming back
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the fold looking for old Usenet buddies, sentimental
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sap that I was a troll for calling him a dumb ass and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asking him to go away.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I bet everyone of you are as stupid as you look.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The real irony is that you're sitting in the sewer,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> complaining about the stench, utterly oblivious that
>>>>>>>>>>>>> you're adding to it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Add to that the irony of a poster such as yourself that
>>>>>>>>>>>> most think of as a monosyllabic twit who vomits foul
>>>>>>>>>>>> language as easily as a bum wipes his ass with his clean
>>>>>>>>>>>> hand and the amount of irony is astounding.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> A few points that I should address:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> -Twits are not, in and of themselves, monosyllabic.
>>>>>>>>>>> However, the words they speak may be.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It appears that somebody owns you.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This particular strand of this thread was initiated by me,
>>>>>>>> about him.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That does not surprise me.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Now, show me something a little more bizarre than his name
>>>>>>>> being mentioned when he is the one being discussed, GrandMoff.
>>>>>>>> Oops, that's twice I have typed your moniker in 2 different
>>>>>>>> posts,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's my title, not my moniker. And there's a space between
>>>>>>> "Grand" and "Moff." BTW, can you ever get anything right?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I prefer GrandMoff, are you stating for the record that you
>>>>>> disapprove of GrandMoff?
>>>>>
>>>>> No, I don't mind if you make an ass of yourself.
>>>>
>>>> By eliminating one space you have determined that I am making an
>>>> ass of myself?
>>>
>>> Well, yeah. Duh.
>>>
>>>> You really are the testy one.
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>>>>> BTW, it is your moniker,
>>>>>
>>>>> You can't distinguish the difference between a title and a
>>>>> moniker. Ha, ha!
>>>>
>>>> Sure I can, GrandMoffRobertBuchanan is your moniker, it makes
>>>> little difference if your given name is at the end of it, this is
>>>> Usenet, idiot.
>>>
>>> Thanks for making as little sense as possible with that response.
>>>
>>>>>> I can provide you with a
>>>>>> definition of moniker if you would like for me to do that.
>>>>>
>>>>> Only if the definition is taken from a legitimate source, such a a
>>>>> dictionary. Do you know what a dictionary is?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hmmm, let's see:
>>>> --------------------------------------
>>>> moniker
>>>>
>>>> Dictionary
>>>> Directory > Words > Dictionary
>>>> mon·i·ker or mon·ick·er (mon'i-k?r)
>>>> n. Slang.
>>>>
>>>> A personal name or nickname.
>>>> --------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Now, I would tell you from what dictionary I obtained this
>>>> definition, GrandMoff, but I would prefer you to ask me politely.
>>>> Show that you have manners and I will share the knowledge.
>>>
>>> I don't care. My dictionary has the same definition. Now look up
>>> the
>>> definition for "title," note the difference, and wallow in the shame
>>> of your own ignorance.
>>>
>>>>>>>> you may be onto
>>>>>>>> something, but I highly doubt it, you don't seem to be that
>>>>>>>> swuft.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I can't help it if you're obsessed with him, you spastic thing,
>>>>>>> you!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> With who? What the **** are you babbling on about?
>>>>>
>>>>> I was referring to your freakish obsession with KM. Your
>>>>> attention span is terrible!
>>>>
>>>> KM? Who in the holy ****ing hell is KM? You are one of those
>>>> Usenet
>>>> freaks everyone warns others about, aren't you?
>>>
>>> You're not even familiar with the acronym that I've applied to the
>>> object of your desire? You're a mess!
>>
>> I see you've met yet another one from my collection of k0oKs. Enjoy.
>
> Kadaitcha, you are my kook. Remember, you ran off last time we had a
> little sparring session. I hurt your monkey like feelings and you got
> mad and went away.
>
> Tonight, you just had to reacquaint yourself with me for some reason,
> I don't know why. But, it will end just the same as last time, me
> pissing you off and you getting mad and not wanting to play anymore.
>
> Altie

<end proof>

> Rhonda, you are not as stupid as you pretend to be, no ****ing way.
> All that bull**** you posted, trying to prove that I have ever said I
> "owned" anyone, was for nothing.
>
> Why was it for nothing? Because I didn't say it, dumb ass. When you
> learn how to follow a thread and determine who is typing what, re-post
> something that you may think I have posted. Then, I will analyze it
> and help you out by telling you if I really posted it or someone that
> was replying to me did.
>
> Example: the sentence above that says "It appears that somebody owns
> you" was not written by me.
>
> Next, try again.
>
> Altie

Argument by snipping, Altie?

I restored the context for you. Don't thank me; it was my pleasure.

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk

Happiness limits the amount of suffering one is
willing to inflict on others. Phèdre nó Delaunay

[Rhonda Lea Kirk]

Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 05:12:53 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man"
> <****-you.ya.****@kiss-my-big-black-ass.com> wrote:
>
>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ <Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>, the backwoods
>> proctologist, clamoured:
>>
>>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 02:47:18 GMT, The Demon Prince of Absurdity
>>> <absurd_number_of_nicks@hell.corn> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 01:32:20 +0000, Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ did the
>>>> cha-cha, and screamed:
>>>>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 01:11:35 GMT, The Demon Prince of Absurdity
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 21:50:20 +0000, Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ did the
>>>>>> cha-cha,
>>>>>> and screamed:
>>>>>>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 03:15:20 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man" wrote:
>>>>>>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk, the trench and ditch digger, dilated:
>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha Man wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Grand Moff Robert Buchanan, the chuck-full marshal,
>>>>>>>>>> bull****ted:
>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>> news:ih34i2tu8faa53sikbb7dstsrd062pi7bg@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 07:11:04 GMT, Grand Moff Robert
>>>>>>>>>>>> Buchanan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:q424i299r43pu7ra0hdn3o1n4ag0kpu0at@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:48:06 GMT, Grand Moff Robert
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Buchanan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:3614i2p71j9pghflcb227a6vt1cp7af7so@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:33:36 GMT, Grand Moff Robert
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Buchanan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:6ov3i21sc8ofnn6pjc983461jfl7f90g16@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:05:29 GMT, Grand Moff Robert
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Buchanan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:c4k3i2pjhinlqtqphs8gjg8k5qodhf4uce@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del ¤:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 05:35:02 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤, the person who loans money and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> takes an arm or a leg as interest payment,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> brown-nosed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A thread chock full of trolls telling a new
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> poster stupid **** and generally acting like
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *******s.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing about that is unusual at all, only
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ironic.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The ironic part is that so many hypocrites could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> congregate so quickly all in one thread.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A lot of you are the same silly *******s who were
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just telling some idiotic, long lost, wayfaring,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> coming back to the fold looking for old Usenet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> buddies, sentimental sap that I was a troll for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> calling him a dumb ass and asking him to go away.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I bet everyone of you are as stupid as you look.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The real irony is that you're sitting in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sewer, complaining about the stench, utterly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oblivious that you're adding to it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Add to that the irony of a poster such as yourself
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that most think of as a monosyllabic twit who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vomits foul language as easily as a bum wipes his
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ass with his clean hand and the amount of irony is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> astounding.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A few points that I should address:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Twits are not, in and of themselves, monosyllabic.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However, the words they speak may be.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It appears that somebody owns you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This particular strand of this thread was initiated by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> me, about him.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That does not surprise me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now, show me something a little more bizarre than his
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> name being mentioned when he is the one being
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> discussed, GrandMoff. Oops, that's twice I have typed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your moniker in 2 different posts,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's my title, not my moniker. And there's a space
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> between "Grand" and "Moff." BTW, can you ever get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anything right?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I prefer GrandMoff, are you stating for the record that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you disapprove of GrandMoff?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, I don't mind if you make an ass of yourself.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> By eliminating one space you have determined that I am
>>>>>>>>>>>> making an ass of myself?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Well, yeah. Duh.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You really are the testy one.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BTW, it is your moniker,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You can't distinguish the difference between a title and a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> moniker. Ha, ha!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure I can, GrandMoffRobertBuchanan is your moniker, it
>>>>>>>>>>>> makes little difference if your given name is at the end
>>>>>>>>>>>> of it, this is Usenet, idiot.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for making as little sense as possible with that
>>>>>>>>>>> response.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can provide you with a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> definition of moniker if you would like for me to do
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only if the definition is taken from a legitimate source,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> such a a dictionary. Do you know what a dictionary is?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hmmm, let's see:
>>>>>>>>>>>> -------------------------------------- moniker
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Dictionary
>>>>>>>>>>>> Directory > Words > Dictionary
>>>>>>>>>>>> mon·i·ker or mon·ick·er (mon'i-k?r) n. Slang.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> A personal name or nickname.
>>>>>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Now, I would tell you from what dictionary I obtained this
>>>>>>>>>>>> definition, GrandMoff, but I would prefer you to ask me
>>>>>>>>>>>> politely. Show that you have manners and I will share the
>>>>>>>>>>>> knowledge.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I don't care. My dictionary has the same definition. Now
>>>>>>>>>>> look up the definition for "title," note the difference, and
>>>>>>>>>>> wallow in the shame of your own ignorance.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you may be onto
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something, but I highly doubt it, you don't seem to be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that swuft.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can't help it if you're obsessed with him, you spastic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thing, you!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> With who? What the **** are you babbling on about?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was referring to your freakish obsession with KM. Your
>>>>>>>>>>>>> attention span is terrible!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> KM? Who in the holy ****ing hell is KM? You are one of
>>>>>>>>>>>> those Usenet freaks everyone warns others about, aren't
>>>>>>>>>>>> you?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You're not even familiar with the acronym that I've applied
>>>>>>>>>>> to the object of your desire? You're a mess!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I see you've met yet another one from my collection of k0oKs.
>>>>>>>>>> Enjoy.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I think I own a share of Altimer, dear.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes dear, I know; what's mine is yours and what's yours is
>>>>>>>> yours.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I already have Rhonda's mind right, Kadaitcha, now there is just
>>>>>>> you. She crumbles easily, not much fight in her. You have
>>>>>>> retard strength to you though, a little tougher.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Poor old Rhonda just goes around bleating and whining about how
>>>>>>> I am mean and not worth responding to because I drone on. LOL
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The thing is, that is what I wanted to do, methodically break
>>>>>>> her spirit and in doing so, win the game of attrition. Which I
>>>>>>> did, she as much as groveled at my feet.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here's hoping this ain't too late, and that I haven't already
>>>>>> nominated anyone for it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> George Armstrong Custer "Kicked @$$" Award
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Given to those brave, inspiring crusaders who will keep up a lost
>>>>>> lunatic cause despite all odds, even after the enemy has won, set
>>>>>> up their own superpower in their midst and are chugging Guinness
>>>>>> in a Kook-free world scenario.
>>>>>
>>>>> That's good, Demon, keep repeating that mantra and eventually your
>>>>> perception may actually become someone's reality. Otherwise, you
>>>>> are grasping at straws, there clearly is no ass kicking going on,
>>>>> on either side, really.
>>>>>
>>>>> Isn't there a clause in the rules that says something like: just
>>>>> because a poster is slamming your head against the wall over and
>>>>> over doesn't mean that he or she shall be granted an award?
>>>>> Reread the guidebook. Do not abuse your nominating power, it will
>>>>> lose all value.
>>>>
>>>> Awww, that's okay, I haven't replied to you enough, of late, to
>>>> properly apply such a beating to you -- Eris knows you've never
>>>> done so to anyone. Your k00ky k'lames of victory (and ownership of
>>>> K-Man), however, are a sure sign of eligibility for this award,
>>>> which, alas, shall be for October.
>>>
>>> So, in other words, you are rock stupid and this is just how you
>>> operate? Over-exaggerated claims of ownership do not make it so.
>>> Example: Kadaitcha claims over and over in every post that I am
>>> owned.
>>
>> Searched all groups
>> Your search - kadaitcha Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com owned - did not
>> match any documents
>>
>> Seems you're delusional, you ****tard ****.
>>
>>> He only does this when he runs out of bull**** to reply with. But,
>>> again, it just doesn't make it true. There has to be undeniable
>>> proof, I know the rules, *****.
>>
>> Undeniable proof, like this:
>>
>> Searched all groups
>> Your search - kadaitcha Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com owned - did not
>> match any documents
>
> Okay, I admit, I get you kookologists mixed up all the time. The
> reason for this is that I don't pay enough attention to what any of
> you have to say for any of it to make a lasting impression on me.
>
> Conclusion: You are all the same to me, one big blob of nonsense
> uttering bull****ters. How can I be expected to keep you separated
> from the others?
>
> Altie

How can you forget him when you named your dog after him, Altimer?

Path:
blackhelicopter.databasix.com!news.glorb.com!newsh ub.sdsu.edu!elnk-nf2-pas!newsfeed.earthlink.net!stamper.news.pas.earthl ink.net!newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net.POSTED!70 9dc226!not-for-mail
From: Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ <Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>
Newsgroups: 24hoursupport.helpdesk
Subject: Dog Breeds
Keywords: Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤
Summary: Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤
Sender: Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@cad.com
Organization: Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤
Reply-To: Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com
Expires: Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤
Message-ID: <9fe1h21mvatvq31uvfl2frrlntf07v11ob@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 14
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 03:58:21 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 4.88.75.25
X-Complaints-To: abuse@earthlink.net
X-Trace: newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net 1158724701 4.88.75.25 (Tue, 19
Sep 2006 20:58:21 PDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 20:58:21 PDT
Xref: blackhelicopter.databasix.com 24hoursupport.helpdesk:97169

I just got a little mixed breed puppy. It is a combination of a
Keeshond and a Shih Tzu.

I think I will name I will name it K-****.

Another ugly little dog I have had for a while is a mix between a
Rhodesian Ridgeback, a Laekenois, and a Komondor.

I named it Rhonda Lee Kirk.

Altie
--
Altimer McDaniel of Clan Donald
Ní h-éibhneas gan Chlainn Domhnaill

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk

Happiness limits the amount of suffering one is
willing to inflict on others. Phèdre nó Delaunay

[Rhonda Lea Kirk]

Grand Moff Robert Buchanan wrote:
> I will now respond to a post accessible as
> news:npg8i2tchn0433b1uctqkd533qd0rg9eud@4ax.com by Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤
> <Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>:
>
>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 22:57:32 GMT, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan
>> <grandmoff@deathstar.galacticempire> wrote:
>>
>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>> news:3hp6i2d8hdvavu9r4n63tdlkp3hao6ingv@4ax.com by Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤
>>> <Ctrl ¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 06:55:29 GMT, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan
>>>> <grandmoff@deathstar.galacticempire> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>> news:cnj6i293qmms4hkfkror2lfq9uf6qtl0sv@4ax.com by Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤
>>>>> <Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 05:36:01 GMT, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan
>>>>>> <grandmoff@deathstar.galacticempire> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>> news:i606i2dnl5eaqfmh7cak0l0r9okebjuanq@4ax.com by
>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ <Ctrl ¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 23:49:56 GMT, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan
>>>>>>>> <grandmoff@deathstar.galacticempire> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>> news854i21tblau7vr0mtaacprnj3qjrpdmso@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ <Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 07:36:47 GMT, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan
>>>>>>>>>> <grandmoff@deathstar.galacticempire> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>> news:ih34i2tu8faa53sikbb7dstsrd062pi7bg@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del
>>> ¤
>>>>>>>>>>> <Ctrl ¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 07:11:04 GMT, Grand Moff Robert
>>>>>>>>>>>> Buchanan <grandmoff@deathstar.galacticempire> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:q424i299r43pu7ra0hdn3o1n4ag0kpu0at@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ <Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:48:06 GMT, Grand Moff Robert
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Buchanan <grandmoff@deathstar.galacticempire> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:3614i2p71j9pghflcb227a6vt1cp7af7so@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del
>>>>>>> ¤
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:33:36 GMT, Grand Moff Robert
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Buchanan <grandmoff@deathstar.galacticempire> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:6ov3i21sc8ofnn6pjc983461jfl7f90g16@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ <Ctrl ¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:05:29 GMT, Grand Moff Robert
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Buchanan <grandmoff@deathstar.galacticempire> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:c4k3i2pjhinlqtqphs8gjg8k5qodhf4uce@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del
>>>>>>>>>>> ¤
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 05:35:02 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <****-you.ya.****@kiss-my-big-black-ass.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ <Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>, the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> person who loans money and takes an arm or a leg
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as interest payment, brown-nosed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A thread chock full of trolls telling a new
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> poster stupid
>>>>>>>>>>> ****
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and generally acting like *******s.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing about that is unusual at all, only
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ironic.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The ironic part is that so many hypocrites could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> congregate
>>>>>>>>>>> so
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> quickly all in one thread.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A lot of you are the same silly *******s who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were just telling some idiotic, long lost,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wayfaring, coming back to the fold looking for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> old Usenet buddies, sentimental sap that I was a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> troll for calling him a dumb ass and asking him
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> go away.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I bet everyone of you are as stupid as you look.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The real irony is that you're sitting in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sewer, complaining about the stench, utterly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oblivious that you're adding to it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Add to that the irony of a poster such as yourself
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>> most
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think of as a monosyllabic twit who vomits foul
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> language as easily as a bum wipes his ass with his
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clean hand and the
>>>>>>>>>>> amount
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of irony is astounding.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A few points that I should address:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Twits are not, in and of themselves, monosyllabic.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However, the words they speak may be.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It appears that somebody owns you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This particular strand of this thread was initiated by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> me,
>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> him.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That does not surprise me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now, show me something a little more bizarre than his
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> name
>>>>>>> being
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mentioned when he is the one being discussed,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GrandMoff. Oops, that's twice I have typed your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> moniker in 2 different posts,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's my title, not my moniker. And there's a space
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> between "Grand" and "Moff." BTW, can you ever get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anything right?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I prefer GrandMoff, are you stating for the record that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>> disapprove
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of GrandMoff?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, I don't mind if you make an ass of yourself.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> By eliminating one space you have determined that I am
>>>>>>>>>>>> making an ass
>>>>>>>>>>>> of myself?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Well, yeah. Duh.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hee hee!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You really are the testy one.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BTW, it is your moniker,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You can't distinguish the difference between a title and a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> moniker.
>>>>>>>>>>> Ha,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ha!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure I can, GrandMoffRobertBuchanan is your moniker, it
>>>>>>>>>>>> makes
>>>>>>> little
>>>>>>>>>>>> difference if your given name is at the end of it, this is
>>>>>>>>>>>> Usenet, idiot.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for making as little sense as possible with that
>>>>>>>>>>> response.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Ahh, you are just saying that because you don't understand.
>>>>>>>>>> I am
>>>>>>> sure
>>>>>>>>>> that happens often.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I must admit that it's hard for me to comprehend the degree of
>>>>>>>>> your stupidity. I just can't relate to you. I'm sorry.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can provide you with a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> definition of moniker if you would like for me to do
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only if the definition is taken from a legitimate source,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> such
>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> a dictionary. Do you know what a dictionary is?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hmmm, let's see:
>>>>>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>> moniker
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Dictionary
>>>>>>>>>>>> Directory > Words > Dictionary
>>>>>>>>>>>> mon·i·ker or mon·ick·er (mon'i-k?r)
>>>>>>>>>>>> n. Slang.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> A personal name or nickname.
>>>>>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Now, I would tell you from what dictionary I obtained this
>>>>>>>>>>>> definition, GrandMoff, but I would prefer you to ask me
>>>>>>>>>>>> politely. Show that you have manners and I will share the
>>>>>>>>>>>> knowledge.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I don't care. My dictionary has the same definition. Now
>>>>>>>>>>> look up the
>>>>>>>>>>> definition for "title," note the difference, and wallow in
>>>>>>>>>>> the shame of your own ignorance.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You blithering, staggering, stumbling, bumbling, buffoon,
>>>>>>>>>> you. You are, right now, using Usenet. What you use to
>>>>>>>>>> identify yourself with is called your moniker. Keep pissing
>>>>>>>>>> around and I will only make you look more retard like than
>>>>>>>>>> you already do, GrandMoff.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> There's the kookrant I was looking for!
>>>>>>>>> Your inadvertent admission of your own ignorance has been
>>>>>>>>> accepted.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you may be onto
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something, but I highly doubt it, you don't seem to be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that swuft.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can't help it if you're obsessed with him, you spastic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thing, you!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> With who? What the **** are you babbling on about?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was referring to your freakish obsession with KM. Your
>>>>>>>>>>>>> attention
>>>>>>>>>>> span
>>>>>>>>>>>>> is terrible!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> KM? Who in the holy ****ing hell is KM? You are one of
>>>>>>>>>>>> those Usenet freaks everyone warns others about, aren't
>>>>>>>>>>>> you?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You're not even familiar with the acronym that I've applied
>>>>>>>>>>> to the object of your desire? You're a mess!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And still you rattle on about some mythical acronym? I think
>>>>>>>>>> you are a kook, GrandMoff, I really do.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Do you even know what an acronym is, you impossible dolt?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Tell me what KM is an acronym for, GrandMoff.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Guess, and then I'll let you know if you're wrong.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why should I guess, you are the one that keeps using it. Just
>>>>>> because I asked you what KM was an acronym for doesn't mean that
>>>>>> I care enough to guess.
>>>>>
>>>>> This is great, because you can't even inadvertently admit that
>>>>> you're either obtuse or obsessed, while already being both!
>>>>
>>>> I don't think you even know what it means, GrandMoff.
>>>
>>> Projecting your own ignorance onto me just makes you look more
>>> stupid (incredibly).
>>
>> Yet you still don't answer my rather simple question. What does it
>> mean?
>
> Well, at least you're being more honest now.
>
>>>> Tell me what it stands for.
>>>
>>> Aren't you bored with this, yet?
>>
>> Not anymore than you are, GrandMoff. I can go on forever, ask
>> somebody.
>
> Oh, I believe that.
>
>>>>>> You have alot to learn and I will be damned if I am going
>>>>>> to teach you.
>>>>>
>>>>> <pats Altie on head>
>>>>>
>>>>> Settle down, little man.
>>>>
>>>> Me? You seem to be obsessed with an acronym of something of the
>>>> other and for that you want me to settle down? Crazy 'ole
>>>> GrandMoff.
>>>
>>> Explain my obsession.
>>
>> You keep on and on and on<PAF>
>
> That routine is old, now. Try something more interesting.

That's the problem. Altimer is a one-trick pony.

He hasn't anything more interesting. What you see here is the whole ball
o' earwax.

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk

Happiness limits the amount of suffering one is
willing to inflict on others. Phèdre nó Delaunay

[Rhonda Lea Kirk]

Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Oct 2006 20:44:26 -0400, "Rhonda Lea Kirk"
> <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ wrote:
>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 04:47:42 GMT, The Demon Prince of Absurdity
>>>>> <absurd_number_of_nicks@hell.corn> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 03:23:47 +0000, Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ did the
>>>>>> cha-cha,
>>>>>> and screamed:
>>>>>>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 02:47:18 GMT, The Demon Prince of Absurdity
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 01:32:20 +0000, Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ did the
>>>>>>>> cha-cha,
>>>>>>>> and screamed:
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 01:11:35 GMT, The Demon Prince of
>>>>>>>>> Absurdity wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 21:50:20 +0000, Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ did the
>>>>>>>>>> cha-cha, and screamed:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 03:15:20 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man" wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk, the trench and ditch digger, dilated:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha Man wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Grand Moff Robert Buchanan, the chuck-full marshal,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bull****ted:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:ih34i2tu8faa53sikbb7dstsrd062pi7bg@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 07:11:04 GMT, Grand Moff Robert
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Buchanan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:q424i299r43pu7ra0hdn3o1n4ag0kpu0at@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:48:06 GMT, Grand Moff Robert
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Buchanan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:3614i2p71j9pghflcb227a6vt1cp7af7so@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:33:36 GMT, Grand Moff Robert
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Buchanan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:6ov3i21sc8ofnn6pjc983461jfl7f90g16@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:05:29 GMT, Grand Moff
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Robert Buchanan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:c4k3i2pjhinlqtqphs8gjg8k5qodhf4uce@4ax.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del ¤:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 05:35:02 +0545, "Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Man" wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤, the person who loans money
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and takes an arm or a leg as interest payment,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> brown-nosed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A thread chock full of trolls telling a new
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> poster stupid **** and generally acting like
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *******s.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing about that is unusual at all, only
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ironic.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The ironic part is that so many hypocrites
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> congregate so quickly all in one thread.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A lot of you are the same silly *******s who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were just telling some idiotic, long lost,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wayfaring, coming back to the fold looking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for old Usenet buddies, sentimental sap that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> troll for calling him a dumb ass and asking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> him to go away.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I bet everyone of you are as stupid as you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> look.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The real irony is that you're sitting in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sewer, complaining about the stench, utterly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oblivious that you're adding to it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Add to that the irony of a poster such as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yourself
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that most think of as a monosyllabic twit who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vomits foul language as easily as a bum wipes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> his ass with his clean hand and the amount of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> irony is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> astounding.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A few points that I should address:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Twits are not, in and of themselves,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> monosyllabic.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However, the words they speak may be.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It appears that somebody owns you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This particular strand of this thread was initiated
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> me, about him.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That does not surprise me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now, show me something a little more bizarre than
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> his name being mentioned when he is the one being
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> discussed, GrandMoff. Oops, that's twice I have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> typed your moniker in 2 different posts,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's my title, not my moniker. And there's a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> space between "Grand" and "Moff." BTW, can you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ever get anything right?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I prefer GrandMoff, are you stating for the record
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that you disapprove of GrandMoff?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, I don't mind if you make an ass of yourself.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> By eliminating one space you have determined that I am
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> making an ass of myself?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, yeah. Duh.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You really are the testy one.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BTW, it is your moniker,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You can't distinguish the difference between a title
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and a moniker. Ha, ha!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure I can, GrandMoffRobertBuchanan is your moniker, it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> makes little difference if your given name is at the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> end of it, this is Usenet, idiot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for making as little sense as possible with that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> response.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can provide you with a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> definition of moniker if you would like for me to do
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only if the definition is taken from a legitimate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> source,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> such a a dictionary. Do you know what a dictionary
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hmmm, let's see:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -------------------------------------- moniker
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dictionary
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Directory > Words > Dictionary
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mon·i·ker or mon·ick·er (mon'i-k?r) n. Slang.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A personal name or nickname.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now, I would tell you from what dictionary I obtained
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> definition, GrandMoff, but I would prefer you to ask me
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> politely. Show that you have manners and I will share
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the knowledge.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't care. My dictionary has the same definition.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now look up the definition for "title," note the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> difference, and wallow in the shame of your own
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignorance.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you may be onto
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something, but I highly doubt it, you don't seem to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that swuft.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can't help it if you're obsessed with him, you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> spastic thing, you!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> With who? What the **** are you babbling on about?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was referring to your freakish obsession with KM.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> attention span is terrible!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> KM? Who in the holy ****ing hell is KM? You are one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of those Usenet freaks everyone warns others about,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aren't you?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're not even familiar with the acronym that I've
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> applied
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the object of your desire? You're a mess!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I see you've met yet another one from my collection of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> k0oKs. Enjoy.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think I own a share of Altimer, dear.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes dear, I know; what's mine is yours and what's yours is
>>>>>>>>>>>> yours.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I already have Rhonda's mind right, Kadaitcha, now there is
>>>>>>>>>>> just you. She crumbles easily, not much fight in her. You
>>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>>> retard strength to you though, a little tougher.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Poor old Rhonda just goes around bleating and whining about
>>>>>>>>>>> how
>>>>>>>>>>> I am mean and not worth responding to because I drone on.
>>>>>>>>>>> LOL
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The thing is, that is what I wanted to do, methodically
>>>>>>>>>>> break her spirit and in doing so, win the game of
>>>>>>>>>>> attrition. Which I
>>>>>>>>>>> did, she as much as groveled at my feet.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Here's hoping this ain't too late, and that I haven't already
>>>>>>>>>> nominated anyone for it.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> George Armstrong Custer "Kicked @$$" Award
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Given to those brave, inspiring crusaders who will keep up a
>>>>>>>>>> lost lunatic cause despite all odds, even after the enemy has
>>>>>>>>>> won, set up their own superpower in their midst and are
>>>>>>>>>> chugging
>>>>>>>>>> Guinness in a Kook-free world scenario.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That's good, Demon, keep repeating that mantra and eventually
>>>>>>>>> your perception may actually become someone's reality.
>>>>>>>>> Otherwise, you are grasping at straws, there clearly is no ass
>>>>>>>>> kicking going on, on either side, really.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Isn't there a clause in the rules that says something like:
>>>>>>>>> just because a poster is slamming your head against the wall
>>>>>>>>> over and over doesn't mean that he or she shall be granted an
>>>>>>>>> award? Reread the guidebook. Do not abuse your nominating
>>>>>>>>> power, it will
>>>>>>>>> lose all value.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Awww, that's okay, I haven't replied to you enough, of late, to
>>>>>>>> properly apply such a beating to you -- Eris knows you've never
>>>>>>>> done so to anyone. Your k00ky k'lames of victory (and ownership
>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>> K-Man), however, are a sure sign of eligibility for this award,
>>>>>>>> which, alas, shall be for October.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So, in other words, you are rock stupid and this is just how you
>>>>>>> operate? Over-exaggerated claims of ownership do not make it so.
>>>>>>> Example: Kadaitcha claims over and over in every post that I am
>>>>>>> owned. He only does this when he runs out of bull**** to reply
>>>>>>> with. But, again, it just doesn't make it true. There has to
>>>>>>> be undeniable proof, I know the rules, *****.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bloviation to avoid admitting a ****-up noted. You made the
>>>>>> k'lame of ownership.
>>>>>
>>>>> You are simply sidestepping the base issue of dubious claimants of
>>>>> ownership. In order to play this game that you want to play, I
>>>>> will require "at least" one statement by myself that I owned
>>>>> anyone. You will have to provide this statement, supposedly made
>>>>> by myself, with full headers.
>>>>>
>>>>> Otherwise, you are standing on shaky ground.
>>>>>
>>>>> Altie
>>>>
>>>> Here's one. I have to go back and dig out the rest, but if you
>>>> continue to dispute your nomination, I'll be happy to do it.
>>>>
>>>> I believe you've claimed ownership of Mr. Plow and me, as well.
>>>>
>> <begin proof>
>>> X-Gerbil-Hamster-Info: Score=0 ScoreLoad=0 ScoreSave=0
>>> Received=20061003040805
>>> Xref: localhost 24hoursupport.helpdesk:7520 alt.comp.anti-virus:2193
>>> alt.comp.os.windows-xp:764 alt.comp.virus:2266
>>> alt.os.windows-xp:3283 alt.privacy.spyware:1588
>>> alt.usenet.kooks:15236 alt.windows-xp:983 Path:
>>> blackhelicopter.databasix.com!news.glorb.com!newsh ub.sdsu.edu!elnk-nf2-pas!newsfeed.earthlink.net!stamper.news.pas.earthl ink.net!newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net.POSTED!70 9dc226!not-for-mail
>>> From: Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ <Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>
>>> Newsgroups:
>>> 24hoursupport.helpdesk,alt.comp.anti-virus,alt.comp.os.windows-xp,alt.comp.virus,alt.os.windows-xp,alt.privacy.spyware,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.window s-xp
>>> Subject: Re: Tell me about this newsgroup
>>> Keywords: Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤
>>> Summary: Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤
>>> Sender: Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@cad.com
>>> Organization: Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤
>>> Reply-To: Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com
>>> Expires: Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤
>>> Message-ID: <4964i2hr36kc4picaguliodngc5rthdnhk@4ax.com>
>>> References: <Xns985112546E913grandmoffdeathstarga@66.133.129.7 1>
>>> <q424i299r43pu7ra0hdn3o1n4ag0kpu0at@4ax.com>
>>> <Xns98511638E3E9Bgrandmoffdeathstarga@66.133.129.7 1>
>>> <ih34i2tu8faa53sikbb7dstsrd062pi7bg@4ax.com>
>>> <Xns98511A94F197grandmoffdeathstarga@66.133.129.71 >
>>> <5tbw95$zvs$o@wretched-pendulums.com>
>>> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.0/32.1071
>>> X-No-Archive: yes
>>> MIME-Version: 1.0
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>>> Lines: 185
>>> Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 08:06:55 GMT
>>> NNTP-Posting-Host: 4.88.79.124
>>> X-Complaints-To: abuse@earthlink.net
>>> X-Trace: newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net 1159862815 4.88.79.124
>>> (Tue, 03 Oct 2006 01:06:55 PDT)
>>> NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 01:06:55 PDT
>>> X-Old-Xref: blackhelicopter.databasix.com
>>> 24hoursupport.helpdesk:100333 alt.comp.anti-virus:12570
>>> alt.comp.os.windows-xp:4122 alt.comp.virus:9334
>>> alt.os.windows-xp:27393 alt.privacy.spyware:10965
>>> alt.usenet.kooks:199914 alt.windows-xp:8362
>>>
>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 13:37:20 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man"
>>> <****-you.ya.****@kiss-my-big-black-ass.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Grand Moff Robert Buchanan <grandmoff@deathstar.galacticempire>,
>>>> the chuck-full marshal, bull****ted:
>>>>
>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>> news:ih34i2tu8faa53sikbb7dstsrd062pi7bg@4ax.com by Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤
>>>>> <Ctrl ¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 07:11:04 GMT, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan
>>>>>> <grandmoff@deathstar.galacticempire> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>> news:q424i299r43pu7ra0hdn3o1n4ag0kpu0at@4ax.com by
>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ <Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:48:06 GMT, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan
>>>>>>>> <grandmoff@deathstar.galacticempire> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>> news:3614i2p71j9pghflcb227a6vt1cp7af7so@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤
>>>>>>>>> <Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:33:36 GMT, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan
>>>>>>>>>> <grandmoff@deathstar.galacticempire> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>> news:6ov3i21sc8ofnn6pjc983461jfl7f90g16@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ <Ctrl ¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:05:29 GMT, Grand Moff Robert
>>>>>>>>>>>> Buchanan <grandmoff@deathstar.galacticempire> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:c4k3i2pjhinlqtqphs8gjg8k5qodhf4uce@4ax.com by
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del ¤ <Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 05:35:02 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <****-you.ya.****@kiss-my-big-black-ass.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ <Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤@dac.com>, the person
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who loans money and takes an arm or a leg as interest
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> payment, brown-nosed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A thread chock full of trolls telling a new poster
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stupid **** and generally acting like *******s.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing about that is unusual at all, only ironic.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The ironic part is that so many hypocrites could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> congregate so quickly all in one thread.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A lot of you are the same silly *******s who were just
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> telling some idiotic, long lost, wayfaring, coming back
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the fold looking for old Usenet buddies, sentimental
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sap that I was a troll for calling him a dumb ass and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asking him to go away.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I bet everyone of you are as stupid as you look.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The real irony is that you're sitting in the sewer,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> complaining about the stench, utterly oblivious that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you're adding to it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Add to that the irony of a poster such as yourself that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> most think of as a monosyllabic twit who vomits foul
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> language as easily as a bum wipes his ass with his clean
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hand and the amount of irony is astounding.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> A few points that I should address:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Twits are not, in and of themselves, monosyllabic.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> However, the words they speak may be.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It appears that somebody owns you.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This particular strand of this thread was initiated by me,
>>>>>>>>>> about him.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That does not surprise me.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Now, show me something a little more bizarre than his name
>>>>>>>>>> being mentioned when he is the one being discussed,
>>>>>>>>>> GrandMoff. Oops, that's twice I have typed your moniker in 2
>>>>>>>>>> different posts,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That's my title, not my moniker. And there's a space between
>>>>>>>>> "Grand" and "Moff." BTW, can you ever get anything right?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I prefer GrandMoff, are you stating for the record that you
>>>>>>>> disapprove of GrandMoff?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No, I don't mind if you make an ass of yourself.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> By eliminating one space you have determined that I am making an
>>>>>> ass of myself?
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, yeah. Duh.
>>>>>
>>>>>> You really are the testy one.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> BTW, it is your moniker,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You can't distinguish the difference between a title and a
>>>>>>> moniker. Ha, ha!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sure I can, GrandMoffRobertBuchanan is your moniker, it makes
>>>>>> little difference if your given name is at the end of it, this is
>>>>>> Usenet, idiot.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for making as little sense as possible with that response.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I can provide you with a
>>>>>>>> definition of moniker if you would like for me to do that.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Only if the definition is taken from a legitimate source, such
>>>>>>> a a dictionary. Do you know what a dictionary is?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hmmm, let's see:
>>>>>> --------------------------------------
>>>>>> moniker
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dictionary
>>>>>> Directory > Words > Dictionary
>>>>>> mon·i·ker or mon·ick·er (mon'i-k?r)
>>>>>> n. Slang.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A personal name or nickname.
>>>>>> --------------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now, I would tell you from what dictionary I obtained this
>>>>>> definition, GrandMoff, but I would prefer you to ask me politely.
>>>>>> Show that you have manners and I will share the knowledge.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't care. My dictionary has the same definition. Now look up
>>>>> the
>>>>> definition for "title," note the difference, and wallow in the
>>>>> shame of your own ignorance.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> you may be onto
>>>>>>>>>> something, but I highly doubt it, you don't seem to be that
>>>>>>>>>> swuft.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I can't help it if you're obsessed with him, you spastic
>>>>>>>>> thing, you!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> With who? What the **** are you babbling on about?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I was referring to your freakish obsession with KM. Your
>>>>>>> attention span is terrible!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> KM? Who in the holy ****ing hell is KM? You are one of those
>>>>>> Usenet
>>>>>> freaks everyone warns others about, aren't you?
>>>>>
>>>>> You're not even familiar with the acronym that I've applied to the
>>>>> object of your desire? You're a mess!
>>>>
>>>> I see you've met yet another one from my collection of k0oKs.
>>>> Enjoy.
>>>
>>> Kadaitcha, you are my kook. Remember, you ran off last time we had
>>> a little sparring session. I hurt your monkey like feelings and
>>> you got mad and went away.
>>>
>>> Tonight, you just had to reacquaint yourself with me for some
>>> reason, I don't know why. But, it will end just the same as last
>>> time, me pissing you off and you getting mad and not wanting to
>>> play anymore.
>>>
>>> Altie
>>
>> <end proof>
>>
>>> Rhonda, you are not as stupid as you pretend to be, no ****ing way.
>>> All that bull**** you posted, trying to prove that I have ever said
>>> I "owned" anyone, was for nothing.
>>>
>>> Why was it for nothing? Because I didn't say it, dumb ass. When
>>> you learn how to follow a thread and determine who is typing what,
>>> re-post something that you may think I have posted. Then, I will
>>> analyze it and help you out by telling you if I really posted it or
>>> someone that was replying to me did.
>>>
>>> Example: the sentence above that says "It appears that somebody
>>> owns you" was not written by me.
>>>
>>> Next, try again.
>>>
>>> Altie
>>
>> Argument by snipping, Altie?
>>
>> I restored the context for you. Don't thank me; it was my pleasure.
>>
>
> Rhonda, seriously, read what I am typing and try to absorb it. You
> claim that I said I owned someone, right?
>
> Then, I say that you should at least post some proof of that, which
> you tried to do.
>
> The problem is that this sentence:
>
> "It appears that somebody owns you"
>
> was not written by me.
>
> What exactly do you not understand, Rhonda? You mistakenly believe
> that I posted that I owned someone. This is the second time that I
> have pointed out to you that you are incorrect.
>
> If you like, I will try to present what I have said in a more basic
> way if you really just don't understand. It will be hard for me, I am
> not used to dealing with such stupendous and thick skulled stupidity,
> but I will try.
>
> Altie

Altimer,

We seem to have a communication failure here.

Let me put it to you plainly.

In the post I quoted, you made the claim that a) Kadaitcha is a kook and
b) that he is your kook.

In point of fact, the only kook in this thread is you, Altimer, and you
are owned, jointly, by Chadwick, Mr. Plow and Kadaitcha, among others.

Now will you please **** off and die?

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk

Happiness limits the amount of suffering one is
willing to inflict on others. Phèdre nó Delaunay