Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: Re: Rhonda Lea Kirks smear campaign

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Rhonda Lea Kirk Guest

    Re: Rhonda Lea Kirks smear campaign

    Nick Skrepetos wrote:
    > Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
    > <garbage snipped>
    >
    > Is it possible that you could keep this out of this newsgroup? I don't
    > think anyone is interested in your constant rambling.


    Dear Nick,

    Does it look to you like I started this thread? Or, for that matter, any
    of these threads that relate to Dustin?

    If you want it to end, talk to Dustin, not me. I don't name threads
    after him, and I haven't put the safety of his family in danger by
    posting his address to alt.sex, inviting the world to stop by. Also, I
    did not stalk him to this group and stay to spam.

    The point is, I have no interest in your complaint, and for your lack of
    discernment and your support of outer filth, you can go **** yourself.

    --
    Rhonda Lea Kirk

    Happiness limits the amount of suffering one is
    willing to inflict on others. Phèdre nó Delaunay



  2. #2
    Damian Guest

    Re: Rhonda Lea Kirks smear campaign

    Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
    > Nick Skrepetos wrote:
    >> Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
    >> <garbage snipped>
    >>
    >> Is it possible that you could keep this out of this newsgroup? I
    >> don't think anyone is interested in your constant rambling.

    >
    > Dear Nick,
    >
    > Does it look to you like I started this thread? Or, for that matter,
    > any of these threads that relate to Dustin?
    >
    > If you want it to end, talk to Dustin, not me. I don't name threads
    > after him, and I haven't put the safety of his family in danger by
    > posting his address to alt.sex, inviting the world to stop by. Also, I
    > did not stalk him to this group and stay to spam.
    >
    > The point is, I have no interest in your complaint, and for your lack
    > of discernment and your support of outer filth, you can go ****
    > yourself.


    IAWTP



  3. #3
    Demon Lord of Confusion Guest

    Re: Rhonda Lea Kirks smear campaign

    On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 08:22:57 -0700, Damian attempted to confuse the issue
    further by squeaking:
    > Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
    >> Nick Skrepetos wrote:
    >>> Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
    >>> <garbage snipped>
    >>>
    >>> Is it possible that you could keep this out of this newsgroup? I don't
    >>> think anyone is interested in your constant rambling.

    >>
    >> Dear Nick,
    >>
    >> Does it look to you like I started this thread? Or, for that matter, any
    >> of these threads that relate to Dustin?
    >>
    >> If you want it to end, talk to Dustin, not me. I don't name threads
    >> after him, and I haven't put the safety of his family in danger by
    >> posting his address to alt.sex, inviting the world to stop by. Also, I
    >> did not stalk him to this group and stay to spam.
    >>
    >> The point is, I have no interest in your complaint, and for your lack of
    >> discernment and your support of outer filth, you can go **** yourself.

    >
    >IAWTP

    IAWTP

    --
    __________________________________________________ ______________________
    Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5; COOSN-029-06-71069
    The God of Odd Statements, the Ugliest Pig****er In The Universe
    Stupidity Takes Its Toll. Please Have Exact Change.
    Thread where outing begins: http://************/hojf8
    George Pickett Memorial Trophy, Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart,
    and the Order of the Holey Sockpuppet winner <wfh_jr@hotmail.com> on
    outing personal contact info in x-poasted subject lines:
    "Plenty of people post under their real names and do not attempt to hide
    their contact info. You are scared of being 'outed' because you are a
    pathological abuser of usenet, and people rightly despise you for it.
    You're afraid of being reported to the authorities or, better, visited
    by a couple of guys with baseball bats. Other people don't have this
    obsessive fear. Ward Hardman himself has posted plenty of personal
    information - nothing that anyone else added was hidden in any way.
    You're so ****ing scared you've built up this whole sick mythology about
    different categories of bad dudes who 'out' scum like you.

    "Meanwhile you are the ugliest pig****er in the universe. You are the
    coward without ethics. You call me a 'newbie' - ha! what an ******* you
    are. Those who want to remain anonymous do so. There is absolutely no
    way you could identify me, not unless you had the sort of subpoena power
    that only gets turned on for big-time terrorists. That's because I chose
    to be anonymous. Some people don't. Only really stupid dicks like you
    choose the sort of semi-anonymity which leaves you in constant fear.

    "What a dickless wonder you are 'Snarky' you fat *******."
    -- in MID: <1156587081.123977.43800@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups. com>

    "I am the only one who has outer filthed Ward" -- James C. "Crackhead"
    Cracked voluntarily self-immolates, in MID:
    1159678991.838385.310840@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.c om

  4. #4
    relic Guest

    Re: Rhonda Lea Kirks smear campaign

    Demon Lord of Confusion wrote:
    > On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 08:22:57 -0700, Damian attempted to confuse the
    > issue further by squeaking:
    >> Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
    >>> Nick Skrepetos wrote:
    >>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
    >>>> <garbage snipped>
    >>>>
    >>>> Is it possible that you could keep this out of this newsgroup? I
    >>>> don't think anyone is interested in your constant rambling.
    >>>
    >>> Dear Nick,
    >>>
    >>> Does it look to you like I started this thread? Or, for that
    >>> matter, any of these threads that relate to Dustin?
    >>>
    >>> If you want it to end, talk to Dustin, not me. I don't name threads
    >>> after him, and I haven't put the safety of his family in danger by
    >>> posting his address to alt.sex, inviting the world to stop by.
    >>> Also, I did not stalk him to this group and stay to spam.
    >>>
    >>> The point is, I have no interest in your complaint, and for your
    >>> lack of discernment and your support of outer filth, you can go
    >>> **** yourself.

    >>
    >> IAWTP

    > IAWTP

    IAWTP



Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •