On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 18:48:41 GMT, Al Bundy <abuse@127.0.0.1> wrote:

>yosponge@yahoo.com (sponge) wrote in
news:8d76ec03.0310290030.573327e8
>@posting.google.com:
>
>> On Mon, 27 Oct 2003 1548 GMT, Al Bundy
<Al.Bundy@GarysShoes.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>I read their DRM FAQ but it's muck.
>>>
>>>Can this be run equally functional on two machines in the same
>> household?
>>>Be dammed if I'm paying "by the room".
>>
>> I highly doubt you can use it on two machines, and even if you can
you
>> may get an unfriendly subpoena. Most likely, actually, you will
only
>> be able to download updates for one copy.
>>
>> I'd stay far, far away from NIS. For a lot of reasons, it's perhaps
>> the last security/privacy-related product I'd recommend. Maybe even
>> behind Evidence Eliminator...
>>
>> Sponge
>> Sponge's Secure Solutions
>> www.geocities.com/yosponge
>> My new email: yosponge2 att yahoo dott com
>
>
>Thanks for the useful reply. Like I said, fairly new in this NG.
Reading
>& reading months of posts. Seems like this Keiro is a decent
replacemnet
>for the firewall piece of NIS? And free! And recommended in this
group!
>
>Now keep an eye out for a NAV replacement I suppose. Plenty of
>subscription time left on NIS.

Kaspersky's is good. McAfee's isn't bad either. Both have
memory-resident interception and are around the same price. You can
download a trial of the former once your NAV subscription runs out.

Sponge
Sponge's Secure Solutions
www.geocities.com/yosponge
My new email: yosponge2 att yahoo dott com