Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13

Thread: Norton 2004 NAV & NIS

  1. #11
    Al Bundy Guest

    Re: Norton 2004 NAV & NIS

    shplink <shplink@removeme.shplink.com> wrote in
    news:7044c0ab72c71e71dc34ad0598de34de@news.teranew s.com:

    > On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 02:56:45 GMT, Al Bundy <postmaster@127.0.0.1>
    > wrote:
    >
    > SNIPPAGE
    >>Yea interesting. Thanks.
    >>
    >>My question was over stated then. Re-phrase:
    >>
    >> Can this be run functional on one machine?!!!

    >
    > Hmmm... define "functional!"
    > ;-)
    >
    > the alt.privacy.spyware FAQ:
    > http://shplink.com/misc/FAQ.htm


    Okaaaaaaay:

    Can this be run on one machine?!!!

    :-)


  2. #12
    little johnny Guest

    Re: Norton 2004 NAV & NIS


    "Al Bundy" <postmaster@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
    news:Xns9424E26FD69DBAlBundy@news.verizon.net...
    > shplink <shplink@removeme.shplink.com> wrote in
    > news:7044c0ab72c71e71dc34ad0598de34de@news.teranew s.com:
    >
    > > On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 02:56:45 GMT, Al Bundy <postmaster@127.0.0.1>
    > > wrote:
    > >
    > > SNIPPAGE
    > >>Yea interesting. Thanks.
    > >>
    > >>My question was over stated then. Re-phrase:
    > >>
    > >> Can this be run functional on one machine?!!!

    > >
    > > Hmmm... define "functional!"
    > > ;-)
    > >
    > > the alt.privacy.spyware FAQ:
    > > http://shplink.com/misc/FAQ.htm

    >
    > Okaaaaaaay:
    >
    > Can this be run on one machine?!!!



    Is there something else I would do with it. I have it running on one
    machine.



  3. #13
    sponge Guest

    Re: Norton 2004 NAV & NIS

    On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 18:48:41 GMT, Al Bundy <abuse@127.0.0.1> wrote:

    >yosponge@yahoo.com (sponge) wrote in

    news:8d76ec03.0310290030.573327e8
    >@posting.google.com:
    >
    >> On Mon, 27 Oct 2003 1548 GMT, Al Bundy

    <Al.Bundy@GarysShoes.com>
    >> wrote:
    >>
    >>>I read their DRM FAQ but it's muck.
    >>>
    >>>Can this be run equally functional on two machines in the same

    >> household?
    >>>Be dammed if I'm paying "by the room".

    >>
    >> I highly doubt you can use it on two machines, and even if you can

    you
    >> may get an unfriendly subpoena. Most likely, actually, you will

    only
    >> be able to download updates for one copy.
    >>
    >> I'd stay far, far away from NIS. For a lot of reasons, it's perhaps
    >> the last security/privacy-related product I'd recommend. Maybe even
    >> behind Evidence Eliminator...
    >>
    >> Sponge
    >> Sponge's Secure Solutions
    >> www.geocities.com/yosponge
    >> My new email: yosponge2 att yahoo dott com

    >
    >
    >Thanks for the useful reply. Like I said, fairly new in this NG.

    Reading
    >& reading months of posts. Seems like this Keiro is a decent

    replacemnet
    >for the firewall piece of NIS? And free! And recommended in this

    group!
    >
    >Now keep an eye out for a NAV replacement I suppose. Plenty of
    >subscription time left on NIS.


    Kaspersky's is good. McAfee's isn't bad either. Both have
    memory-resident interception and are around the same price. You can
    download a trial of the former once your NAV subscription runs out.

    Sponge
    Sponge's Secure Solutions
    www.geocities.com/yosponge
    My new email: yosponge2 att yahoo dott com

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •