Gator suing companies that call them spyware

[Joe Moore]

Joe Moore <munged@bad.example.com> wrote:

>"Thane@Cawdor.Net" <Me@nospam.com> wrote:
>
>>Read about it here:
>>
>>http://news.com.com/2100-1032_3-5095051.html?tag=st_lh
>
>I want to know what companies are so desperate
>that they would advertise using a sleazebag spyware
>outfit like Gator.
>
>I also want to know what companies not to patronize
>before hell freezes over.
>
>Anyone have a list of Gator's paying advertisers?

Never mind. I found it.

http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/...customers.html

Now we know how they can afford to sue their critics into submission.

joemooreaterolsdotcom

[Jay T. Blocksom]

On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 09:10:52 GMT, in <alt.privacy.spyware>, Joe Moore
<munged@bad.example.com> wrote:
>
[snip]
>
> Never mind. I found it.
>
>
http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/...customers.html
>
[snip]

Thanks for that *very* handy Instant ****list.

--

Jay T. Blocksom
--------------------------------
Appropriate Technology, Inc.
usenet01[at]appropriate-tech.net


"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
NOTE: E-Mail address in "From:" line is INVALID! Remove +SPAMBLOCK to mail.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Unsolicited advertising sent to this E-Mail address is expressly prohibited
under USC Title 47, Section 227. Violators are subject to charge of up to
$1,500 per incident or treble actual costs, whichever is greater.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -