Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Spam Remedy

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Jay T. Blocksom Guest

    Re: Spam Remedy

    On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 08:29:31 +0200, in <alt.privacy.spyware>, "Fruns
    Dimerik" <bosschurch@planet.nl> wrote:
    >
    > Spam Remedy (anti spam created by spammers) is still moving. The word
    > nagsoft says it all. Many suspect that this is a Trojan horse.
    >

    [snip]

    All well and good, but why did you then go on to post ~170 lines of the spam
    -- in full-on agonizing HTML-crap form, yet?

    A. This is *not* <news.admin.net-abuse.sightings>.
    B. HTML is *never* appropriate here.

    --

    Jay T. Blocksom
    --------------------------------
    Appropriate Technology, Inc.
    usenet01[at]appropriate-tech.net


    "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
    safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    -- Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759.

    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    NOTE: E-Mail address in "From:" line is INVALID! Remove +SPAMBLOCK to mail.
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    Unsolicited advertising sent to this E-Mail address is expressly prohibited
    under USC Title 47, Section 227. Violators are subject to charge of up to
    $1,500 per incident or treble actual costs, whichever is greater.
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

  2. #2
    Dick Hazeleger Guest

    Re: Spam Remedy

    Jay T. Blocksom wrote:

    > On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 08:29:31 +0200, in <alt.privacy.spyware>,
    > "Fruns Dimerik" <bosschurch@planet.nl> wrote:
    > >
    > > Spam Remedy (anti spam created by spammers) is still moving.

    > The word > nagsoft says it all. Many suspect that this is a
    > Trojan horse. >
    > [snip]
    >
    > All well and good, but why did you then go on to post ~170 lines
    > of the spam -- in full-on agonizing HTML-crap form, yet?
    >
    > A. This is not <news.admin.net-abuse.sightings>.
    > B. HTML is never appropriate here.


    Errrr. Jay... in my reader your sig is 25 lines... is THAT
    appropriate here? Forgot to switch sigs after you came over from
    NANAS?

    Have a good week end,
    Dick

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •