On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 03:45:44 GMT, in <alt.privacy.spyware>, "-=ô;ö=-"
<Not.Telling@nowhere.com> wrote:
>
> Reprinted from http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=16985
>
[snip]

I guess you didn't notice this part:

--> © 2003 Independent Media Institute. All rights reserved.
--> Reproduction by Syndication Service only.

???

This is NOT the first time you've pulled this same stunt, nor the first time
you've been called on it. Are you *trying* to piss off the world at large?

Perhaps you don't realize that you do the anti-spyware cause -- not to
mention *everyone* concerned with the incessant erosion of our personal
liberties and privacy -- a GREAT disservice each time you commit blatant
copyright infringment like this. That just gives the RIAAs and MPAAs and
Microsofts and other DRM-scheme hawkers of this world that much more ammo to
use *against* legitimate users.

So *why* are you trying to help them usurp our rights?

--

Jay T. Blocksom
--------------------------------
Appropriate Technology, Inc.
usenet01[at]appropriate-tech.net


"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
NOTE: E-Mail address in "From:" line is INVALID! Remove +SPAMBLOCK to mail.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Unsolicited advertising sent to this E-Mail address is expressly prohibited
under USC Title 47, Section 227. Violators are subject to charge of up to
$1,500 per incident or treble actual costs, whichever is greater.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -