SPY BOTS OR AD-WARE?

[LoScara]

What is the better?

[Albert_Hall]

I use them both, couse I can't decide.
"LoScara" <loscara84@virgilio.it> wrote in message
news:vZffb.160900$hE5.5412547@news1.tin.it...
> What is the better?
>
>

[YK]

LoScara wrote:
> What is the better?

I wear jeans when I work and slacks when I go out to dinner. Jeans are
better when I work and slacks look nicer. So both are better in each
situation so I use both.

SpywareBlaster is my jacket as it is getting cold here now.
http://www.javacoolsoftware.com/spywareblaster.html

Then there is the HOSTS file that covers me at night to keep me comfy and
warm.
http://www.mvps.org/winhelp2002/hosts.htm

I keep them updated regularly so they don't become shabby and worn as I do
not want to appear as a slob.

[David Emerling]

"LoScara" <loscara84@virgilio.it> wrote in message
news:vZffb.160900$hE5.5412547@news1.tin.it...
> What is the better?
>

I have no idea which one is "better." Like most people, I use both. SpyBot
always seems to find things Adaware missed and, when I run them in a
different order, Adaware finds things SpyBot missed.

I will say this, however; SpyBot runs more quickly. Running Adaware reminds
me of running an entire system scan with Norton Anti-virus ... which takes
freakin' forever.

David Emerling
Memphis, TN

[Arthur_d]

Yeah, but Norton rules though ;-)
--


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
FIGHT BACK AGAINST SPAM!
Download Spam Inspector, the Award Winning Anti-Spam Filter
http://mail.giantcompany.com


"David Emerling" <demerlin(REMOVE_THIS)@midsouth.rr.com> skrev i melding
news:HRCfb.1433$oC5.1418@clmboh1-nws5.columbus.rr.com...
>
> "LoScara" <loscara84@virgilio.it> wrote in message
> news:vZffb.160900$hE5.5412547@news1.tin.it...
> > What is the better?
> >
>
> I have no idea which one is "better." Like most people, I use both.
SpyBot
> always seems to find things Adaware missed and, when I run them in a
> different order, Adaware finds things SpyBot missed.
>
> I will say this, however; SpyBot runs more quickly. Running Adaware
reminds
> me of running an entire system scan with Norton Anti-virus ... which takes
> freakin' forever.
>
> David Emerling
> Memphis, TN
>
>

[VacuumHead]

I personally use SpyBot. It's free and it works. It tracks keyloggers,
dialers, the whole schabang. What more can you ask for? I'm sure there
are better warez for tracking spyware, but "Free" sounds good to me.








"Arthur_d" <geirhene@broadpark.no> wrote in message news:<3f7f16e8@news.broadpark.no>...
> Yeah, but Norton rules though ;-)
> --
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> FIGHT BACK AGAINST SPAM!
> Download Spam Inspector, the Award Winning Anti-Spam Filter
> http://mail.giantcompany.com
>
>
> "David Emerling" <demerlin(REMOVE_THIS)@midsouth.rr.com> skrev i melding
> news:HRCfb.1433$oC5.1418@clmboh1-nws5.columbus.rr.com...
> >
> > "LoScara" <loscara84@virgilio.it> wrote in message
> > news:vZffb.160900$hE5.5412547@news1.tin.it...
> > > What is the better?
> > >
> >
> > I have no idea which one is "better." Like most people, I use both.
> SpyBot
> > always seems to find things Adaware missed and, when I run them in a
> > different order, Adaware finds things SpyBot missed.
> >
> > I will say this, however; SpyBot runs more quickly. Running Adaware
> reminds
> > me of running an entire system scan with Norton Anti-virus ... which takes
> > freakin' forever.
> >
> > David Emerling
> > Memphis, TN
> >
> >

[siljaline]

On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 14:46:51 GMT, "LoScara" <loscara84@virgilio.it> wrote:

>What is the better?
>
Neither, run both.

HTH


--
siljaline

"Arguing with anonymous strangers on the Internet is a sucker's game
because they almost always turn out to be -- or to be indistinguishable from
-- self-righteous sixteen-year-olds possessing infinite amounts of free time."
- Neil Stephenson, _Cryptonomicon_