Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Norton Internet Security, product activation.

  1. #1
    David Arnstein Guest

    Norton Internet Security, product activation.

    I see that NIS 2004 has gone on sale at various web stores. Has anyone
    installed it yet? How bad is the product activation feature?
    --
    David Arnstein
    arnstein+usenet@pobox.com

  2. #2
    Malke Guest

    Re: Norton Internet Security, product activation.

    David Arnstein wrote:

    > I see that NIS 2004 has gone on sale at various web stores. Has
    > anyone
    > installed it yet? How bad is the product activation feature?


    I installed it for a client. The activation was not a problem (he has a
    cable connection) and only took a few seconds. The first activation
    isn't what concerns me - it's the second, third, etc. that worries me.
    How much trouble will it be to reactivate after reinstalling Windows
    (for whatever reason)? How long will Symantec support that particular
    product for reactivation? What bugs will crop up? Symantec software can
    be troublesome - when it works, it's great but when it messes up, it's
    a bear to deal with. Personally, I've switched to F-Prot on my Windows
    boxen, but it isn't user-friendly enough for most of my clients.

    HTH,

    Malke
    --
    Elephant Boy Computers
    www.elephantboycomputers.com
    Don't Panic!

  3. #3
    Jay T. Blocksom Guest

    Re: Norton Internet Security, product activation.

    On Thu, 02 Oct 2003 06:51:30 -0700, in <alt.privacy.spyware>, Malke
    <malke@thereisnospoon.com> wrote:
    >
    > David Arnstein wrote:
    >
    > > I see that NIS 2004 has gone on sale at various web stores. Has
    > > anyone
    > > installed it yet? How bad is the product activation feature?

    >
    > I installed it for a client.

    [snip]

    Only after making him sign a release stating (among other things) that
    you're doing this only as a result of his direct order, and that it is
    against your professional advice to run such malware, right?

    --

    Jay T. Blocksom
    --------------------------------
    Appropriate Technology, Inc.
    usenet01[at]appropriate-tech.net


    "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
    safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    -- Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759.

    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    NOTE: E-Mail address in "From:" line is INVALID! Remove +SPAMBLOCK to mail.
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    Unsolicited advertising sent to this E-Mail address is expressly prohibited
    under USC Title 47, Section 227. Violators are subject to charge of up to
    $1,500 per incident or treble actual costs, whichever is greater.
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

  4. #4
    Jay T. Blocksom Guest

    Re: Norton Internet Security, product activation.

    On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 01:05:14 +0000 (UTC), in <alt.privacy.spyware>,
    arnstein@panix.com (David Arnstein) wrote:
    >
    > I see that NIS 2004 has gone on sale at various web stores. Has anyone
    > installed it yet? How bad is the product activation feature?


    Unacceptable on principle:

    <http://www.extremetech.com/print_article/0,3998,a=39843,00.asp>

    What more do you need to know?

    --

    Jay T. Blocksom
    --------------------------------
    Appropriate Technology, Inc.
    usenet01[at]appropriate-tech.net


    "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
    safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    -- Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759.

    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    NOTE: E-Mail address in "From:" line is INVALID! Remove +SPAMBLOCK to mail.
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    Unsolicited advertising sent to this E-Mail address is expressly prohibited
    under USC Title 47, Section 227. Violators are subject to charge of up to
    $1,500 per incident or treble actual costs, whichever is greater.
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •