In article <MPG.19dd71702dd712d9989b1e@news.charter.net>,
colonel_flagg@NOSOUPFORJ00internetwarzone.org says...
> In article <9RMcb.153330$0v4.11425106@bgtnsc04-
> news.ops.worldnet.att.net>, ron-reaugh@worldnet.att.net says...
> > The presence of BackWeb in the F-Secure download and the fact that it causes
> > SpyBot to hang an XP system is simply unconscionable and moves F-Secure to
> > the dark side.
>
>
> You're a goddamn idiot.
>
> Backweb isn't bad, the people that MISUSE it *under certain
> circumstances* would be considered bad.
>
> a gun, when sitting in a cabinet harms no one... put it in a crack-heads
> hands and someone will eventually get shot....
>
> a piece of software, hell, let's say Internet Explorer is *meant* to
> view websites, browse the web, whatever.... when placed in the wrong
> hands.... you can completely and totally destroy websites with it
> through Unicode Exploits...
>
> Backweb is used by legitimate and accepted programs.
>
> Backweb is used by illegitimate and unacceptable malicious programs.
>
> Get the idea you ****ing moron?
>
>
>
>



--
Colonel Flagg
http://www.internetwarzone.org/

Privacy at a click:
http://www.cotse.net

Q: How many Bill Gates does it take to change a lightbulb?
A: None, he just defines Darkness? as the new industry standard..."

"...I see stupid people."