"Colonel Flagg" <colonel_flagg@NOSOUPFORJ00internetwarzone.org> wrote in
message news:MPG.19dd71702dd712d9989b1e@news.charter.net.. .
> In article <9RMcb.153330$0v4.11425106@bgtnsc04-
> news.ops.worldnet.att.net>, ron-reaugh@worldnet.att.net says...
> > The presence of BackWeb in the F-Secure download and the fact that it
causes
> > SpyBot to hang an XP system is simply unconscionable and moves F-Secure
to
> > the dark side.
>
>
> You're a goddamn idiot.
>
> Backweb isn't bad, the people that MISUSE it *under certain
> circumstances* would be considered bad.

Clueless.

Try your nonsensical rantings on the folks at SpyBot who immediately strip
out(or at least try to) that which F-Secure Trialware installs aka BackWeb.
What is F-Secure doing installing something(BackWeb) that SpyBot has
identified as something to rip out? What is F-Secure doing installing
something(BackWeb) that is SpyBot resistant and results in system hangs?
That's the smokin gun here.

Blacklist F-Secure is the obvoius course for those with a clue.