spyware prevention question

[The person you think]

Sheesh you don't understand what is sometimes coined "donationware"????

"Jay T. Blocksom" <usenet01+SPAMBLOCK@appropriate-tech.net> wrote in message
news:at16ovkdv1v95be5jpb96205tqqfpcue5h@news.rcn.c om...
> On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 23:14:28 +1000, in <alt.privacy.spyware>, "The person
> you think" <spamis@the****house.com> wrote:
> >
> [snip]
> >
> > They aren't FREEWARE.
> >
>
> What the He__ are you going on about?
>
> From the SS&D distribution file, <English.license.txt>:
>
> --> I. Freeware
> --> First of all, the reasons why Spybot-S&D is free:
> -->
> --> I.a. Dedication
> --> Spybot-S&D is dedicated to the most wonderful girl on earth
> -->
> --> I.b. Binary
> --> What do you get if you buy software? Lots of ones and zeros, nothing
> --> more. If they were distributed as art, I could understand paying it.
> --> But if the main goal of their order is to earn money - by fees or
> --> ads - I don't like it!
>
> From the vendor's download page for Ad-Aware 6.x
> <http://www.lavasoft.de/support/download/>:
>
> --> Welcome to our freeware and shareware Downloads page!
> --> Choose a site to download your copy of Ad-aware, the
> --> Ad-aware Help file, RefUpdate, RegHance and Ad-search
> --> from. The freeware* version of Ad-aware is compatible
> --> with Windows 98/ME/NT40, Windows 2000 + Windows XP
>
> --
>
> Jay T. Blocksom
> --------------------------------
> Appropriate Technology, Inc.
> usenet01[at]appropriate-tech.net
>
>
> "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
> safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
> -- Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759.
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-
> NOTE: E-Mail address in "From:" line is INVALID! Remove +SPAMBLOCK to
mail.
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-
> Unsolicited advertising sent to this E-Mail address is expressly prohibite
d
> under USC Title 47, Section 227. Violators are subject to charge of up to
> $1,500 per incident or treble actual costs, whichever is greater.
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-

[Jay T. Blocksom]

On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 23:41:20 +1000, in <alt.privacy.spyware>, "The person you
think" <spamis@the****house.com> wrote:
>
> Sheesh you don't understand what is sometimes coined "donationware"????
>
[snip]

A. Please stop top-posting.

B. Please learn to trim your posts of unnecessary/irrelevent quoted
material.

C. Please crawl back under whatever rock you slithered out from.

--

Jay T. Blocksom
--------------------------------
Appropriate Technology, Inc.
usenet01[at]appropriate-tech.net


"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
NOTE: E-Mail address in "From:" line is INVALID! Remove +SPAMBLOCK to mail.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Unsolicited advertising sent to this E-Mail address is expressly prohibited
under USC Title 47, Section 227. Violators are subject to charge of up to
$1,500 per incident or treble actual costs, whichever is greater.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

[The person you think]

A) You cant stop anyone top posting and there is nothing wrong with it. Just
because you don't like it doesn't make it wrong.

B) I'll trim what I want.

C) Stop being USENET-COP, twit.


"Jay T. Blocksom" <not.deliverable+USENET@appropriate-tech.net> wrote in
message news:fpcnov4ufb6k9nti8kefb6loakfqpuv3tu@news.rcn.c om...
> On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 23:41:20 +1000, in <alt.privacy.spyware>, "The person
you
> think" <spamis@the****house.com> wrote:
> >
> > Sheesh you don't understand what is sometimes coined "donationware"????
> >
> [snip]
>
> A. Please stop top-posting.
>
> B. Please learn to trim your posts of unnecessary/irrelevent quoted
> material.
>
> C. Please crawl back under whatever rock you slithered out from.
>
> --
>
> Jay T. Blocksom
> --------------------------------
> Appropriate Technology, Inc.
> usenet01[at]appropriate-tech.net
>
>
> "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
> safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
> -- Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759.
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-
> NOTE: E-Mail address in "From:" line is INVALID! Remove +SPAMBLOCK to
mail.
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-
> Unsolicited advertising sent to this E-Mail address is expressly
prohibited
> under USC Title 47, Section 227. Violators are subject to charge of up to
> $1,500 per incident or treble actual costs, whichever is greater.
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-

[Little Johnny]

Mr. Blocksom is this groups equivalent of "Patty" on
alt.private.investigator.



"The person you think" <spamis@the****house.com> wrote in message
news:dN_ib.339$Ls3.12771@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au...
> A) You cant stop anyone top posting and there is nothing wrong with it.
Just
> because you don't like it doesn't make it wrong.
>
> B) I'll trim what I want.
>
> C) Stop being USENET-COP, twit.
>
>
> "Jay T. Blocksom" <not.deliverable+USENET@appropriate-tech.net> wrote in
> message news:fpcnov4ufb6k9nti8kefb6loakfqpuv3tu@news.rcn.c om...
> > On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 23:41:20 +1000, in <alt.privacy.spyware>, "The person
> you
> > think" <spamis@the****house.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Sheesh you don't understand what is sometimes coined
"donationware"????
> > >
> > [snip]
> >
> > A. Please stop top-posting.
> >
> > B. Please learn to trim your posts of unnecessary/irrelevent quoted
> > material.
> >
> > C. Please crawl back under whatever rock you slithered out from.
> >
> > --
> >
> > Jay T. Blocksom
> > --------------------------------
> > Appropriate Technology, Inc.
> > usenet01[at]appropriate-tech.net
> >
> >
> > "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
> > safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
> > -- Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759.
> >
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> -
> > NOTE: E-Mail address in "From:" line is INVALID! Remove +SPAMBLOCK to
> mail.
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> -
> > Unsolicited advertising sent to this E-Mail address is expressly
> prohibited
> > under USC Title 47, Section 227. Violators are subject to charge of up
to
> > $1,500 per incident or treble actual costs, whichever is greater.
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> -
>

[The person you think]

So?


"James E. Morrow" <jamesemorrow@email.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9414C25D17F2Ejamesmorrowemailcom@205.188.1 38.161...
> "The person you think" <spamis@the****house.com> wrote in
> news:dN_ib.339$Ls3.12771@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au:
>
> > A) You cant stop anyone top posting and there is nothing wrong
> > with it. Just because you don't like it doesn't make it wrong.
> >
> > B) I'll trim what I want.
> >
> > C) Stop being USENET-COP, twit.
> >
> >
> > "Jay T. Blocksom" <not.deliverable+USENET@appropriate-tech.net>
> > wrote in message
> > news:fpcnov4ufb6k9nti8kefb6loakfqpuv3tu@news.rcn.c om...
> >> On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 23:41:20 +1000, in <alt.privacy.spyware>, "The
> >> person
> > you
> >> think" <spamis@the****house.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Sheesh you don't understand what is sometimes coined
> >> > "donationware"????
> >> >
> >> [snip]
> >>
> >> A. Please stop top-posting.
> >>
> >> B. Please learn to trim your posts of unnecessary/irrelevent
> >> quoted material.
> >>
> >> C. Please crawl back under whatever rock you slithered out from.
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> Jay T. Blocksom
> >> --------------------------------
> >> Appropriate Technology, Inc.
> >> usenet01[at]appropriate-tech.net
> >>
> >>
> >> "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little
> >> temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
> >> -- Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759.
> >>
> >> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> >> - - - -
> > -
> >> NOTE: E-Mail address in "From:" line is INVALID! Remove
> >> +SPAMBLOCK to
> > mail.
> >> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> >> - - - -
> > -
> >> Unsolicited advertising sent to this E-Mail address is expressly
> > prohibited
> >> under USC Title 47, Section 227. Violators are subject to charge
> >> of up to $1,500 per incident or treble actual costs, whichever is
> >> greater. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> >> - - - - - - - - -
> > -
> >
> >
>
> http://www.dickalba.demon.co.uk/usen.../faq_topp.html
>
>
> --
> James E. Morrow
> Email to: jamesemorrow@email.com

[The person you think]

IOW, make a rule to delete anything coming from him? I just top posted
back to the twit to get him upset. Honestly, only pedantic wankers care at
all if you top, bottom or interject-post!



"Little Johnny" <missb93@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:voqjsnb9t7ccbe@corp.supernews.com...
> Mr. Blocksom is this groups equivalent of "Patty" on
> alt.private.investigator.
>
>
>
> "The person you think" <spamis@the****house.com> wrote in message
> news:dN_ib.339$Ls3.12771@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au...
> > A) You cant stop anyone top posting and there is nothing wrong with it.
> Just
> > because you don't like it doesn't make it wrong.
> >
> > B) I'll trim what I want.
> >
> > C) Stop being USENET-COP, twit.
> >
> >
> > "Jay T. Blocksom" <not.deliverable+USENET@appropriate-tech.net> wrote in
> > message news:fpcnov4ufb6k9nti8kefb6loakfqpuv3tu@news.rcn.c om...
> > > On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 23:41:20 +1000, in <alt.privacy.spyware>, "The
person
> > you
> > > think" <spamis@the****house.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Sheesh you don't understand what is sometimes coined
> "donationware"????
> > > >
> > > [snip]
> > >
> > > A. Please stop top-posting.
> > >
> > > B. Please learn to trim your posts of unnecessary/irrelevent quoted
> > > material.
> > >
> > > C. Please crawl back under whatever rock you slithered out from.
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Jay T. Blocksom
> > > --------------------------------
> > > Appropriate Technology, Inc.
> > > usenet01[at]appropriate-tech.net
> > >
> > >
> > > "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
> > > safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
> > > -- Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759.
> > >
> >
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> > -
> > > NOTE: E-Mail address in "From:" line is INVALID! Remove +SPAMBLOCK to
> > mail.
> >
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> > -
> > > Unsolicited advertising sent to this E-Mail address is expressly
> > prohibited
> > > under USC Title 47, Section 227. Violators are subject to charge of
up
> to
> > > $1,500 per incident or treble actual costs, whichever is greater.
> >
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> > -
> >
>
>

[Jay T. Blocksom]

On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 08:29:31 +1000, in <alt.privacy.spyware>, "The person
you think" <spamis@the****house.com> wrote:
>
> A) You cant stop anyone top posting
[snip]

True, but I can stop listening.

(See below.)

> and there is nothing wrong with it.
[snip]

Yes, there is.

<http://www.faqs.org/docs/jargon/T/top-post.html>
<http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/gey_chr0.htm>
<http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html>

> Just
> because you don't like it doesn't make it wrong.
>
[snip]

It is by no means "just me".

<http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html>

--> - If you are sending a reply to a message or a posting be sure you
--> summarize the original at the top of the message, or include just
--> enough text of the original to give a context. This will make
--> sure readers understand when they start to read your response.
--> Since NetNews, especially, is proliferated by distributing the
--> postings from one host to another, it is possible to see a
--> response to a message before seeing the original. Giving context
--> helps everyone. But do not include the entire original!

> B) I'll trim what I want.
>
[snip]

Perhaps it didn't sink in the first time...

<http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html>

--> - If you are sending a reply to a message or a posting be sure you
--> summarize the original at the top of the message, or include just
--> enough text of the original to give a context. This will make
--> sure readers understand when they start to read your response.
--> Since NetNews, especially, is proliferated by distributing the
--> postings from one host to another, it is possible to see a
--> response to a message before seeing the original. Giving context
--> helps everyone. But do not include the entire original!

> C) Stop being USENET-COP, twit.
>
[snip]

Stop being an drooling, knuckle-dragging, OutleakExcuse-using, obnoxiously
"Stupid And Proud Of It" newbie, ****wit.

*plonk*

--

Jay T. Blocksom
--------------------------------
Appropriate Technology, Inc.
usenet01[at]appropriate-tech.net


"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
NOTE: E-Mail address in "From:" line is INVALID! Remove +SPAMBLOCK to mail.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Unsolicited advertising sent to this E-Mail address is expressly prohibited
under USC Title 47, Section 227. Violators are subject to charge of up to
$1,500 per incident or treble actual costs, whichever is greater.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

[Jay T. Blocksom]

On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 19:06:24 -0500, in <alt.privacy.spyware>, "James E.
Morrow" <jamesemorrow@email.com> wrote:
>
> Lines: 68
[snip]
>
> http://www.dickalba.demon.co.uk/usen.../faq_topp.html


Thanks for the vote of support; but as long as we're on the subject...

<http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html>

--> Content of a follow-up post should exceed quoted content.

--

Jay T. Blocksom
--------------------------------
Appropriate Technology, Inc.
usenet01[at]appropriate-tech.net


"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
NOTE: E-Mail address in "From:" line is INVALID! Remove +SPAMBLOCK to mail.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Unsolicited advertising sent to this E-Mail address is expressly prohibited
under USC Title 47, Section 227. Violators are subject to charge of up to
$1,500 per incident or treble actual costs, whichever is greater.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -