On Wed, 08 Oct 2003 04:05:06 GMT, in <alt.privacy.spyware>, sethra
<azoblue@myrealboxDOT.com> wrote:
>
> Jay T. Blocksom <usenet01+SPAMBLOCK@appropriate-tech.net> wrote in
> news:n8d6ovsiqam5ffpcjtq86s9012o06dar38@news.rcn.c om:
>
> [Jay's histrionics snipped]
>
[snip]
Apparently, in an effort to avoid addressing the points I raised.
> Regardless, that in no way negates the fact that everything I've said
> regarding Eudora is easily verifiable.
[snip]
Since several of your claims were flat-out false, so too is that statement.
> Furthermore, arguing with those
> who are either so insecure or misinformed they have to resort to ad
> hominems is neither productive nor educational,
[snip]
On this point, I concur. And since you have consistently exhibited
precisely that behavior throughout this thread ("...disregarding your
misunderstanding of...", "If you had actually read my post...",
"histrionics", etc.), there remains only one more thing to say:
*plonk*
--
Jay T. Blocksom
--------------------------------
Appropriate Technology, Inc.
usenet01[at]appropriate-tech.net
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
NOTE: E-Mail address in "From:" line is INVALID! Remove +SPAMBLOCK to mail.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Unsolicited advertising sent to this E-Mail address is expressly prohibited
under USC Title 47, Section 227. Violators are subject to charge of up to
$1,500 per incident or treble actual costs, whichever is greater.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Reply With Quote