Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13

Thread: Problem with Trusted Sites

  1. #11
    Jay T. Blocksom Guest

    Re: Problem with Trusted Sites

    On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 11:31:16 -0700, in <alt.privacy.spyware>, "Trish"
    <trish.conway@netzero.net> wrote:
    >

    [snip]

    > I deleted all and, at least the symptom of the problem has disappeared.

    [snip]

    Exactly. You've treated the symptom, not the disease.

    > I now
    > have all IE zones set to maximum security and use it only for Windows
    > Crutical Updates (windowsupdate.microsoft.com) is trusted. I lower
    > trusted security only for those updates.
    >
    > I hope that seems sound?
    >

    [snip]

    Sorry, but no. To be free of the multitude of hazards MSIE both represents
    and enables, you MUST remove it from your system entirely. This free tool:

    <http://www.litepc.com/ieradicator.html

    will make that task child's play. (Note that to use this with Win2K-SR2 or
    later or WinXP will require that you first disable WFP. This is *not*
    "child's play"; but it's not terribly difficult either. See
    <http://www.jsifaq.com/SUBK/tip5300/rh5392.htm>.)

    --

    Jay T. Blocksom
    --------------------------------
    Appropriate Technology, Inc.
    usenet01[at]appropriate-tech.net


    "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
    safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    -- Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759.

    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    NOTE: E-Mail address in "From:" line is INVALID! Remove +SPAMBLOCK to mail.
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    Unsolicited advertising sent to this E-Mail address is expressly prohibited
    under USC Title 47, Section 227. Violators are subject to charge of up to
    $1,500 per incident or treble actual costs, whichever is greater.
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

  2. #12
    Trish Guest

    Re: Problem with Trusted Sites

    Thanks, Jay. But, as I mentioned, I think MS's made getting Windows
    Critical Updates too difficult without IE.

    Trish

    "Jay T. Blocksom" <usenet01+SPAMBLOCK@appropriate-tech.net> wrote in message
    news:jbl0mvgdqqmnbombjffst320l6t8al95sm@news.rcn.c om...
    > On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 11:31:16 -0700, in <alt.privacy.spyware>, "Trish"
    > <trish.conway@netzero.net> wrote:
    > >

    > [snip]
    >
    > > I deleted all and, at least the symptom of the problem has disappeared.

    > [snip]
    >
    > Exactly. You've treated the symptom, not the disease.
    >
    > > I now
    > > have all IE zones set to maximum security and use it only for Windows
    > > Crutical Updates (windowsupdate.microsoft.com) is trusted. I lower
    > > trusted security only for those updates.
    > >
    > > I hope that seems sound?
    > >

    > [snip]
    >
    > Sorry, but no. To be free of the multitude of hazards MSIE both

    represents
    > and enables, you MUST remove it from your system entirely. This free

    tool:
    >
    > <http://www.litepc.com/ieradicator.html

    .. . . .



  3. #13
    Jay T. Blocksom Guest

    Re: Problem with Trusted Sites

    On Fri, 12 Sep 2003 17:14:27 -0700, in <alt.privacy.spyware>, "Trish"
    <trish.conway@netzero.net> wrote:
    >
    > Thanks, Jay. But, as I mentioned, I think MS's made getting Windows
    > Critical Updates too difficult without IE.
    >

    [snip]

    I tend to disagree, but that's beside the point really -- such a judgement
    call is, after all, yours to make. But having made it, then the *only*
    logical conclusion is that Windows itself is not a viable platform for your
    computing purposes, since it is a foregone conclusion that MSIE is
    unacceptably hazardous.

    --

    Jay T. Blocksom
    --------------------------------
    Appropriate Technology, Inc.
    usenet01[at]appropriate-tech.net


    "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
    safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    -- Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759.

    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    NOTE: E-Mail address in "From:" line is INVALID! Remove +SPAMBLOCK to mail.
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    Unsolicited advertising sent to this E-Mail address is expressly prohibited
    under USC Title 47, Section 227. Violators are subject to charge of up to
    $1,500 per incident or treble actual costs, whichever is greater.
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •