On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 00:29:35 -0400, Jay T. Blocksom
<usenet01+SPAMBLOCK@appropriate-tech.net> wrote:

>On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 05:11:30 GMT, in <alt.privacy.spyware>, shplink
><shplink@removeme.shplink.com> wrote:
> >
> > Message-ID: <b02ed7a0b0371d70b5d137ecc7f3f975@news.teranews.co m>
> > Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 05:11:30 GMT
> > Lines: 417
> > From: shplink <shplink@removeme.shplink.com>
> > Newsgroups: alt.privacy.spyware
> > Subject: The FAQ for <alt.privacy.spyware> [updated July 30, 2003]
> >
> [snip]
>
>OK, this is at least the third *different* version to be labeled "[updated
>July 30, 2003]". You really need to be consistent with your posting style,
>etc., if that attempt at "version control" is going to be at all useful.

Hi Jay, I am guessing you are referring to my word wrap -er- "issues"?
There is no other difference in the last three July 30 FAQs, unless I
am losing my mind...?

the alt.privacy.spyware FAQ:
http://shplink.com/misc/FAQ.htm