Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15

Thread: Hosts

  1. #11
    siljaline Guest

    Re: Hosts


    "BoB" <rhoward30@myrealbox.com> wrote in message news:6op1lvghsv8ca17qfbud95njp83ok9divh@4ax.com...
    > The large [700k] host file from IE_SpyAd can include 40,000 adult
    > sites for another 130k. The small [92k] MVP host file doesn't do porn.


    <major snippage>

    > BoB
    >


    The MVP file does do Porn and it's 114KB.
    HOSTS Toggle doesn't trash your file?

    --

    siljaline

    "Arguing with anonymous strangers on the Internet is a sucker's game
    because they almost always turn out to be -- or to be indistinguishable from
    -- self-righteous sixteen-year-olds possessing infinite amounts of free time."
    - Neil Stephenson, _Cryptonomicon_




  2. #12
    Data64 Guest

    Re: Hosts

    "Steve Wahnd" <magic88W@hotmail.com> wrote in
    news:biohb3$bjlcg$1@ID-127880.news.uni-berlin.de:

    > I have just discovered the hosts file. I d/l what looks to be a
    > pretty good hosts file. The problem is that now my wife claims it
    > blocks some of the sites she uses. Is there a program or an easy way
    > to turn the hosts file on and off?
    > As a side note - maybe I should ask her what sites she is frequenting.
    >
    >


    You might want to look at hostess, which makes it easier to manage
    the host file. ie. add/remove entries and also toggle it on and off.


    http://accs-net.com/hostess/

    data64

  3. #13
    BoB Guest

    Re: Hosts

    On Sun, 31 Aug 2003 04:49:19 GMT, "YoKenny" <YKnot@home.invalid> wrote:

    >siljaline wrote:
    >> "BoB" <rhoward30@myrealbox.com> wrote in message
    >> news:6op1lvghsv8ca17qfbud95njp83ok9divh@4ax.com...
    >>> The large [700k] host file from IE_SpyAd can include 40,000 adult
    >>> sites for another 130k. The small [92k] MVP host file doesn't do
    >>> porn.

    >>
    >> <major snippage>
    >>
    >>> BoB
    >>>

    >>
    >> The MVP file does do Porn and it's 114KB.
    >> HOSTS Toggle doesn't trash your file?

    >
    >I think BoB is confusing some things.
    >IE-SPYAD is not a HOSTS file but a .reg file that adds sites to the Internet
    >Explorer Restricted Zone. It does not stop going to the sites it just stops
    >the site from doing nasty things to your system. Your mind is another
    >matter but this should be discussed in another newsgroup.


    Obviously I'm confused between the two. Host Toggle never gave me a
    problem but I'll try the other on-the-fly host controller.

    I saw the following in a July msg:

    "In other words, the Restricted sites zone is a kind of insurance
    policy. Ad servers that pass through the HOSTS file just fine
    will be restricted by the Restricted sites zone."

    Why is a host file necessary if IE-Spyad is used?

    TIA,

    BoB


  4. #14
    YoKenny Guest

    Re: Hosts

    BoB wrote:
    > "YoKenny" wrote:
    >> siljaline wrote:
    >>> "BoB" wrote:
    >>>> The large [700k] host file from IE_SpyAd can include 40,000 adult
    >>>> sites for another 130k. The small [92k] MVP host file doesn't do
    >>>> porn.
    >>>
    >>> <major snippage>
    >>>
    >>>> BoB
    >>>
    >>> The MVP file does do Porn and it's 114KB.
    >>> HOSTS Toggle doesn't trash your file?

    >>
    >> I think BoB is confusing some things.
    >> IE-SPYAD is not a HOSTS file but a .reg file that adds sites to the
    >> Internet Explorer Restricted Zone. It does not stop going to the
    >> sites it just stops the site from doing nasty things to your system.
    >> Your mind is another matter but this should be discussed in another
    >> newsgroup.

    >
    > Obviously I'm confused between the two. Host Toggle never gave me a
    > problem but I'll try the other on-the-fly host controller.
    >
    > I saw the following in a July msg:
    >
    > "In other words, the Restricted sites zone is a kind of insurance
    > policy. Ad servers that pass through the HOSTS file just fine
    > will be restricted by the Restricted sites zone."


    This statement is confusing. Ad server sites that are in the HOSTS file
    can not get past it. Ad server sites not in the HOSTS file will get past
    it. Ad server sites that are in the Restricted zone will not be able to do
    their nastyness. The people that provide these files have different
    sites listed due to their experience and preferences. Some of the sites
    are listed in both but the HOSTS file is the one that takes precedence.

    > Why is a host file necessary if IE-Spyad is used?


    Good question. The HOSTS file is for completely blocking access to sites.
    So if you come across an offensive site that you would not want someone to
    see or have access to you place it in the HOSTS file. I find that Eric's
    IE-SPYAD is more up to date with sites that are browser hijackers but this
    does not stop the ads in their Web pages. So in a nutshell I use both
    because I want to stop ads and nasties. Hope I have cleared this up a bit.
    BTW, I have 18,315 entries in my HOSTS file.


  5. #15
    BoB Guest

    Re: Hosts

    On Mon, 01 Sep 2003 05:32:02 GMT, "YoKenny" <YKnot@home.invalid> wrote:

    >BoB wrote:
    >> "YoKenny" wrote:
    >>> siljaline wrote:
    >>>> "BoB" wrote:
    >>>>> The large [700k] host file from IE_SpyAd can include 40,000 adult
    >>>>> sites for another 130k. The small [92k] MVP host file doesn't do
    >>>>> porn.
    >>>>
    >>>> <major snippage>
    >>>>
    >>>>> BoB
    >>>>
    >>>> The MVP file does do Porn and it's 114KB.
    >>>> HOSTS Toggle doesn't trash your file?
    >>>
    >>> I think BoB is confusing some things.
    >>> IE-SPYAD is not a HOSTS file but a .reg file that adds sites to the
    >>> Internet Explorer Restricted Zone. It does not stop going to the
    >>> sites it just stops the site from doing nasty things to your system.
    >>> Your mind is another matter but this should be discussed in another
    >>> newsgroup.

    >>
    >> Obviously I'm confused between the two. Host Toggle never gave me a
    >> problem but I'll try the other on-the-fly host controller.
    >>
    >> I saw the following in a July msg:
    >>
    >> "In other words, the Restricted sites zone is a kind of insurance
    >> policy. Ad servers that pass through the HOSTS file just fine
    >> will be restricted by the Restricted sites zone."

    >
    >This statement is confusing. Ad server sites that are in the HOSTS file
    >can not get past it. Ad server sites not in the HOSTS file will get past
    >it. Ad server sites that are in the Restricted zone will not be able to do
    >their nastyness. The people that provide these files have different
    >sites listed due to their experience and preferences. Some of the sites
    >are listed in both but the HOSTS file is the one that takes precedence.
    >
    >> Why is a host file necessary if IE-Spyad is used?

    >
    >Good question. The HOSTS file is for completely blocking access to sites.
    >So if you come across an offensive site that you would not want someone to
    >see or have access to you place it in the HOSTS file. I find that Eric's
    >IE-SPYAD is more up to date with sites that are browser hijackers but this
    >does not stop the ads in their Web pages. So in a nutshell I use both
    >because I want to stop ads and nasties. Hope I have cleared this up a bit.
    >BTW, I have 18,315 entries in my HOSTS file.


    Excellent. Clear as a bell now. Thanks

    BoB


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •