On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 17:50:50 GMT, in <alt.privacy.spyware>, "BxP9" <NOMAIL>
wrote:
>
[snip]

Please do not top-post.

Please DO edit your posts to exclude unnecessary/irrelevant material.

> If Window Washer is junk, which would you recommend?
> TIA
>
[snip]

First and foremost, set the system up correctly in the first place. If you
do that, the "need" for after-the-fact "band-aids" like WW is largely
obviated.

Beyond that, the old standby products like AdAware and SS&D will do all
those things that WW does which are really useful/necessary.

--

Jay T. Blocksom
--------------------------------
Appropriate Technology, Inc.
usenet01[at]appropriate-tech.net


"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
NOTE: E-Mail address in "From:" line is INVALID! Remove +SPAMBLOCK to mail.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Unsolicited advertising sent to this E-Mail address is expressly prohibited
under USC Title 47, Section 227. Violators are subject to charge of up to
$1,500 per incident or treble actual costs, whichever is greater.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -