Protecting Americans or Bushies Regime ?

[StopinDaSpam]

Welcomew to the Bush Regime! the Fourth Reich. Heil Bush!!

esmzoso wrote:
> Haven't you heard?
>
> Everything is a threat to national security in the U.S.A.
>
> Phones, email, gatherings of more than two people, [one if your
> schizophrenic], letters, stamps, free press, free speech, due process,
> where your car goes, what you wear, who you associate with, credit
> reports, credit card records, search your house, your car, your pants,
> your luggage, naked photos of you in airports, library books, what you
> eat,t-shirts with the wrong message, posterboard, shoes, movies, radio,
> internet. . .
>
> I am sure we will all be wearing name tags soon, also.
>
> "Citizen, where is your name tag? It is supposed to be securely
> fastened to your forehead."
>
> esmzoso


--


[i know nothing, NOTHING!] -Sergeant Hans Schultz




.................................................. ...............
Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access
>>>> at http://www.TitanNews.com <<<<
-=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=-

[Igor Gutman]

StopinDaSpam wrote:
>
> Welcomew to the Bush Regime! the Fourth Reich. Heil Bush!!
>

you guys think he'll get a second term?..

[Eric Lee Green]

In article <3F3BFFB9.B5924E20@videotron.ca>, Igor Gutman ruminated:
> StopinDaSpam wrote:
>>
>> Welcomew to the Bush Regime! the Fourth Reich. Heil Bush!!
>>
>
> you guys think he'll get a second term?..

Sure, if a) he cancels the elections, or b) his operatives rig all the
voting machines.

Otherwise...

--
Eric Lee Green mailto:eric@badtux.org



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

[esmzoso]

He's [George W.] pretty popular.

I don't see anyone really viable at this time to challenge him.

But, it looked that way for his father also. I think "read my lips"
stopped Bush I from being re-elected.

But really, who will we have to choose from? More criminal politicians
with other circles of friends, with other objectives?

It's looking pretty bleak.

esmzoso

[Thane@Cawdor.Net]

On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 17:31:37 -0400, Igor Gutman <gutman@videotron.ca>
wrote:

>StopinDaSpam wrote:
>>
>> Welcomew to the Bush Regime! the Fourth Reich. Heil Bush!!
>>
>
>you guys think he'll get a second term?..

Yeah, if he don't win it he'll steal it like last time...Or use
terrorism as an excuse to declare martial law and "postpone" the
election.

[Randall Bart]

'Twas Fri, 15 Aug 2003 16:43:15 -0400 when all alt.privacy.spyware stood
in awe as "Thane@Cawdor.Net" <Me@nospam.com> uttered:

>Yeah, if he don't win it he'll steal it like last time...Or use
>terrorism as an excuse to declare martial law and "postpone" the
>election.

Every government is subject to the will of the people. Even Louis XVI was
subject to the will of the people. If you can fool some of the people all
of the time, and you can fool all of the people some of the time, then you
can fool enough of the people enough of the time, but there are limits.
For over 200 years the USA has had Congressional elections every two years
and presidential elections every four years. Those elections have been
held on the day after the first Monday in November for about 180 years.
Even in 1862 and 1864 and 1942 and 1944, the elections were held.

You can assassinate a president (Kennedy), you can assassinate a candidate
(Kennedy), you can rig an election (Kennedy), but those can be
rationalized and covered up. There is no plausibly deniability in
postponing an election. It will cause too many people to doubt the
legitimacy of the government.

--
RB |\ © Randall Bart
aa |/ admin@RandallBart.spam.com Barticus@att.spam.net
nr |\ Please reply without spam I LOVE YOU 1-917-715-0831
dt ||\ http://RandallBart.com/ Ånåheim Ångels 2002 World Chåmps!
a |/ Multiple sclerosis: http://www.cbc.ca/webone/alison/
l |\ DOT-HS-808-065 The Church Of The Unauthorized Truth:
l |/ MS^7=6/28/107 http://yg.cotut.com mailto:s@cotut.com

[tony@well.com]

On Sat, 16 Aug 2003 00:33:14 GMT, Randall Bart <Barticus@att.spam.net>
wrote:

> If you can fool some of the people all
>of the time, and you can fool all of the people some of the time, then you
>can fool enough of the people enough of the time, but there are limits.

As a confirmation, have a look at

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...-2003Aug9.html

T.
========================
Tony Roder, speaking his mind....