On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 01:55:14 GMT, in <alt.privacy.spyware>, darren sanborn
<sandmansdream4u@insightbb.com> wrote:
>
> wow! didn't know it was so easy!
[snip]

Presuming that what you're talking about is address-munging, as opposed to
anonymous posting/mailing (which, as I and others have pointed out, is a
different animal entirely -- and essentially impossible), it's not
particularly difficult. But unfortunately, the "finer points" of
address-munging are not well understood by many people; and as a result of
that, most of the advice you've been given so far is wrong, in at least some
way. I suggest you download and carefully review:

<http://www.faqs.org/faqs/net-abuse-faq/munging-address/>

especially sections 3b. and 4d.

> Although I think this is the right
> group.
[snip]

Well... There's probably a few "better" ones (<news.answers> comes to mind,
for example); but this question is not so far off-topic here that anyone
should be upset by it.

> IE privacy
>
[snip]

*That* is an oxymoron of galactic proportions.

--

Jay T. Blocksom
--------------------------------
Appropriate Technology, Inc.
usenet01[at]appropriate-tech.net


"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
NOTE: E-Mail address in "From:" line is INVALID! Remove +SPAMBLOCK to mail.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Unsolicited advertising sent to this E-Mail address is expressly prohibited
under USC Title 47, Section 227. Violators are subject to charge of up to
$1,500 per incident or treble actual costs, whichever is greater.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -