>
> "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
> safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
> -- Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759.
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-
> NOTE: E-Mail address in "From:" line is INVALID! Remove +SPAMBLOCK to
mail.
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-
> Unsolicited advertising sent to this E-Mail address is expressly
prohibited
> under USC Title 47, Section 227. Violators are subject to charge of up to
> $1,500 per incident or treble actual costs, whichever is greater.
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-

Jay

I've have also read the posting for AOL users however that was written
several years ago. I question the technique of using INVALID in place of
the domain. In the very same section it mentions not using something that
is too "Standard". If everyone is using .INVALID then wouldn't that make it
easy for the bots/harvesters to just strip out the INVALID and then all the
Spammers need to do is add either .com or .net and then get a users valid
email address? Seems like bad advice to me. Besides you didn't use
invalid in your munge :-)
My $.02 worth.