FAUX News bites off more than it can chew . . .

[PhilliePhan]

Fox News Sunday, Interview With President Bill Clinton, 9/22/06

Read the full interview. Not just the chopped and edited BS they air.

[whip]

Clinton pwned him!

[Gizmokid2005]

OWNED!!! It's about time somebody puts an interviewer in their place...

[mrweasel]

Clinton's a lawyer. It's what they do. Still doesn't change the fact the guy's a scumbag.

[knight0334]

I was never a fan of Clinton due to his(or his battle axe's) views on 2nd Amendment Rights, but he did do a good job with the economy and other issues.

Its so easy to pin the hard times of present and past on someone from the past. Both Fox and CNN news reporting companies are well known for creating news to fit their side. Fox being conservative, CNN being liberal. BOTH are guilty of it.

It was good to see Clinton set him straight, even if I dont like his other political standings. ...Reporters, lawyers, insurance companies and politicians are generally the scum of the Earth - the less we have, the cleaner this place will be.

[PhilliePhan]

I really have no problem with a reporter "ambushing" an interviewee with an unexpected question or two. The trouble with FOX is that they like to ask and answer the questions themselves.
Good for Clinton to stand up and not take any of that BS. He had a number of options:
- not answer and have FOX do it for him
- storm off the set like Bill O'Reilly did with Terry Gross (guess he couldn't take a dose of his own medicine)

- or, do what he did - Make Wallace allow him to answer the questions himself.

I can't help but imagine GW Bush in the same position . . . HA!
Of course, he'd never be in that position. Six years after his presidency, I imagine he'll be well-faded into the woodwork. 'Course, we'll still be cleaning up his messes. . . .
But, I imagine W won't be out there trying to make the world a better place like Carter and Clinton have done and are continuing to do. ( I imagine Reagan would have continued his efforts as well, if his health had allowed it)

[mrweasel]

Bush would be babbling something incoherent, but the reason was the economy boomed under CLinton was because of Reganonmics, not because of something Bubba did.

[Gizmokid2005]

Yup....it usually takes a couple of years for any administrative change to take effect...at least when it's in the US government.

[PhilliePhan]

Reagonomics? Gimme a break.

Clinton just had the good fortune to be in office during the Internet boom - he can't take credit for that.
However, the budget was balanced on Clinton's watch and that HUGE budget Surplus he left would be looking pretty damn good now if Bush hadn't pissed it away.

[HOEDY]

I like how the reporter tried to stop Clinton while he started his rant.

Here's the vid.
Part 1:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xvUIwa1rkNU
Part 2:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J58gKXTgrjI
Part 3:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCfj6tK-ftk&NR