Hijack This 1.96 Available

[siljaline]

No further details at this time, use the update feature within HJT to obtain the
latest - Merijn's site does not show this update information.


--
siljaline

"Arguing with anonymous strangers on the Internet is a sucker's game
because they almost always turn out to be -- or to be indistinguishable from
-- self-righteous sixteen-year-olds possessing infinite amounts of free time."
- Neil Stephenson, _Cryptonomicon_

[siljaline]

On Fri, 01 Aug 2003 19:15:22 -0400, siljaline <siljaline@invalid.com> wrote:

>No further details at this time, use the update feature within HJT to obtain the
>latest - Merijn's site does not show this update information.
>
>
* HijackThis v1.96 *
Written by Merijn - merijn@spywareinfo.com
http://www.spywareinfo.com/~merijn/files/hijackthis.zip
http://www.spywareinfo.com/~merijn/index.html

See below version history for short info on hijack sections.

* Version history *
[v1.96]
* Lots of bugfixes and small enhancements! Among others:
* Fix for Japanese IE toolbars
* Fix for searchwww.com fake CLSID trick in IE toolbars and BHO's
* O19 (user stylesheet) now only checks for known bad filenames
* Attributes on Hosts file will now be restored when scanning/fixing/restoring
it.
* Added several files to the LSP whitelist
* Fixed some issues with incorrectly re-encrypting data, making R0/R1 go
undetected until a restart
* All sites in the Trusted Zone are now shown, with the exception of those on
the nonstandard but safe domain list.



--
siljaline

"Arguing with anonymous strangers on the Internet is a sucker's game
because they almost always turn out to be -- or to be indistinguishable from
-- self-righteous sixteen-year-olds possessing infinite amounts of free time."
- Neil Stephenson, _Cryptonomicon_

[Dick Hazeleger]

siljaline wrote:

> On Fri, 01 Aug 2003 19:15:22 -0400, siljaline <siljaline@invalid.com>
> wrote:
>
> >No further details at this time, use the update feature within HJT
> to obtain the >latest - Merijn's site does not show this update
> information. >
> >
> * HijackThis v1.96 *
> Written by Merijn - merijn@spywareinfo.com
> http://www.spywareinfo.com/~merijn/files/hijackthis.zip
> http://www.spywareinfo.com/~merijn/index.html
>
> See below version history for short info on hijack sections.
>
> * Version history *
> [v1.96]
> * Lots of bugfixes and small enhancements! Among others:
> * Fix for Japanese IE toolbars
> * Fix for searchwww.com fake CLSID trick in IE toolbars and BHO's
> * O19 (user stylesheet) now only checks for known bad filenames
> * Attributes on Hosts file will now be restored when
> scanning/fixing/restoring it.
> * Added several files to the LSP whitelist
> * Fixed some issues with incorrectly re-encrypting data, making R0/R1
> go undetected until a restart
> * All sites in the Trusted Zone are now shown, with the exception of
> those on the nonstandard but safe domain list.
>
>
>

Thanks for the heads up, Siljaline!


> --
> siljaline
>
> "Arguing with anonymous strangers on the Internet is a sucker's game
> because they almost always turn out to be -- or to be
> indistinguishable from -- self-righteous sixteen-year-olds possessing
> infinite amounts of free time." - Neil Stephenson, Cryptonomicon

I always get your sig in my replies, not those of others... could there
be something wrong with my settings?

Dick

[siljaline]

On Sun, 03 Aug 2003 23:17:21 -0000, "Dick Hazeleger"
<Dick@post_it_in_the_newsgroup.com> wrote:

>Thanks for the heads up, Siljaline!
>I always get your sig in my replies, not those of others... could there
>be something wrong with my settings?
>
>Dick

Hi Dick,

You're welcome for the FYI!

Not familiar with your usenet reader but as YK said, quote fix may be your
answer. I like the way you spoofed your IP or NNTP posting host.

You can go ahead and manually hack off my sig, most do anyway. Been using it
just a bit too long but I can't think of something better so it stays for now.

Regards,


--
siljaline

"Arguing with anonymous strangers on the Internet is a sucker's game
because they almost always turn out to be -- or to be indistinguishable from
-- self-righteous sixteen-year-olds possessing infinite amounts of free time."
- Neil Stephenson, _Cryptonomicon_

[YK]

siljaline wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Aug 2003 23:17:21 -0000, "Dick Hazeleger"
> <Dick@post_it_in_the_newsgroup.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the heads up, Siljaline!
>> I always get your sig in my replies, not those of others... could
>> there
>> be something wrong with my settings?
>>
>> Dick
>
> Hi Dick,
>
> You're welcome for the FYI!
>
> Not familiar with your usenet reader but as YK said, quote fix may be
> your answer. I like the way you spoofed your IP or NNTP posting host.
>
> You can go ahead and manually hack off my sig, most do anyway. Been
> using it just a bit too long but I can't think of something better so
> it stays for now.
>
> Regards,

How about?

If you give a man a fish he is fed for a day.
If you teach a man to fish then he has an excuse to sit in a boat drinking
beer all day.

[Data64]

siljaline <siljaline@invalid.com> wrote in
news:crhriv4bc779qotmkn69542pk70fvgd16e@4ax.com:

> On Sun, 03 Aug 2003 23:17:21 -0000, "Dick Hazeleger"
><Dick@post_it_in_the_newsgroup.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the heads up, Siljaline!
>> I always get your sig in my replies, not those of others... could
>> there be something wrong with my settings?

It seems to work fine for me. Xnews properly removes the signature
when I reply to siljaline.

data64

[Jay T. Blocksom]

On Thu, 07 Aug 2003 02:34:39 GMT, in <alt.privacy.spyware>, Data64
<me@privacy.net> wrote:
>
[snip]
>
> It seems to work fine for me. Xnews properly removes the signature
> when I reply to siljaline.
>
> data64

Then Xnews is broken, because "siljaline"'s articles contain NO identifiable
"sig".

--

Jay T. Blocksom
--------------------------------
Appropriate Technology, Inc.
usenet01[at]appropriate-tech.net


"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
NOTE: E-Mail address in "From:" line is INVALID! Remove +SPAMBLOCK to mail.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Unsolicited advertising sent to this E-Mail address is expressly prohibited
under USC Title 47, Section 227. Violators are subject to charge of up to
$1,500 per incident or treble actual costs, whichever is greater.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

[Jay T. Blocksom]

On Sun, 03 Aug 2003 23:17:21 -0000, in <alt.privacy.spyware>, "Dick
Hazeleger" <Dick@post_it_in_the_newsgroup.com> wrote:
>
[snip]
>
> I always get your sig in my replies, not those of others... could there
> be something wrong with my settings?
>
[snip]

Probably not.

All recent messages posted by "siljaline" (well, at least the half-dozen or
so I checked) have carried an invalid sig separator. A proper a sig
separator is *THREE* characters: "-- " on a line by themselves;
"siljaline"'s are missing the trailing space (compare to mine, below).

--

Jay T. Blocksom
--------------------------------
Appropriate Technology, Inc.
usenet01[at]appropriate-tech.net


"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
NOTE: E-Mail address in "From:" line is INVALID! Remove +SPAMBLOCK to mail.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Unsolicited advertising sent to this E-Mail address is expressly prohibited
under USC Title 47, Section 227. Violators are subject to charge of up to
$1,500 per incident or treble actual costs, whichever is greater.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -