Re: Did Spyware make me a "pedophile"

[Lu Tze]

"JMBCV" <nobody@mail.jmbcv.net> wrote in message
news:dce8f866bdad6c8439e737fa02b82ed1@mail.jmbcv.n et...
> Dear Ryan,
>
> A friend of mine had the exact problem, only in his case, the
> woman involved, unlike yours
> reported him to the RCMP also. I advised my friend download a
> copy of Evidence Eliminator and run it right away, as Evidence
> Eliminator is the only one of the "wipers"
> that will do the job in juse one click. He did this. The
> Mounties seized his hard drive and
> lucky for him, found nothing remotely incriminating.
>
> Download and Evidence Eliminator right away
> http://fizgigen.notlong.com
>
> Joe Pyle
> ETCO INTERNATIONAL
>
> "Ryan Jackson" <tito_jackson51@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:6bfWa.5166$mv6.902982@news20.bellglobal.com.. .
> > Hi, I'm new here, and I have a major problem. and I am looking for
> > information
> >
> > I own an IBM thinkpad. it was sent to IBM to be serviced in March, I
got
> > it back in may, but the HD was wiped. I re-installed my anti-virus, and
> > Security (both Norton) and went back to my usual internet habits. a week
> > later I was at my friends watching some movies on the laptop, I had to
leave
> > for a bit, so I told her she could listen to my music. to make a long
story
> > short. she found Child Porn in my recieved files for MSN. I dont look at
any
> > porn, and children, well thats just very, very wrong..
> >
> > anyway, the police are currently running forensics on the computer.
but
> > they say I will most likely be charged with possesion. if I am convicted
I
> > am looking at 2-5 years. I need to clear my name.
> >
> > at this point I believe someone hacked through my security and
put
> > the files there. for what reason I do not know. if anyone out there can
help
> > me, in any way. info, past experience, etc....please respond to my plea.
I
> > am an innocent man, and I fear the justice system will fail me, if I
dont
> > take action
> >
> > I have been told by people in other groups that it is likely that
> > someone used a form of spyware, to plant the files on my system. If
anyone
> > can help me understand, this, or figure out how it could happen. Or if
you
> > can provide me with any other ideas/information. i would greatly
appreciate
> > it.
> >
> > thanks
> >
> > Ryan
>
And the powers that be will still find what they are looking for and you
will have confirmed you have something to hide with the references to E.E in
your registry and fat and elsewhere.

--
Lu Tze

Whale Oil Beef Hooked.

[Dick Hazeleger]

Joe Pyle wrote:

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Lu Tze" <id10t@ward14.com>
> Newsgroups: alt.privacy.spyware
> Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 9:56 AM
> Subject: Re: Did Spyware make me a "pedophile"
>
> > "JMBCV" <nobody@mail.jmbcv.net> wrote in message
> > news:dce8f866bdad6c8439e737fa02b82ed1@mail.jmbcv.n et...
> > > Dear Ryan,
> > >
> > > A friend of mine had the exact problem, only in his case, the
> > > woman involved, unlike yours
> > > reported him to the RCMP also. I advised my friend download a
> > > copy of Evidence Eliminator and run it right away, as Evidence
> > > Eliminator is the only one of the "wipers"
> > > that will do the job in juse one click. He did this. The
> > > Mounties seized his hard drive and
> > > lucky for him, found nothing remotely incriminating.
> > >
> > > Download and Evidence Eliminator right away
> > > http://fizgigen.notanymore.com

NOTE: SPAM link atered by me

>
> > > "Ryan Jackson" <tito_jackson51@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > > news:6bfWa.5166$mv6.902982@news20.bellglobal.com.. .
> > >
> > And the powers that be will still find what they are looking for
> > and you will have confirmed you have something to hide with the
> > references to E.E
> in
> > your registry and fat and elsewhere.
>
> Are you familiar with the power Evidence Eliminator, Lu Tze? If not,
> you should not
> state flatly that "powers that be will still find what they are
> looking for" If you don't really
> know the program. Evidences of "E.E" prove nothing.
>
> Maybe you can tell us about a program that will do what Evidence
> Eliminator say it
> does???
>
> -----
> Art Jones

Now, Joe... or is it Art???

Are you telling me that EE can do all they spamvertize? I want to see
them disable file:///c: on my system (that is the trick behind that FUD
page on their site, they redirect you to)...

They make claims that they cannot hold.

I'd love to test EE under all kinds of different circumstances, but
since they are not too eager to give the buyer a "try before you buy"
option (I checked the place from top to bottom), I am not too eager to
waste my money.

I challenge RH Software to make the claims they make on their site true
for a panel of independant experts (or a judge at a court of law
perhaps?), I know they cannot... and so do you!

My advice:

1. Decide what name you use first
2. Stop spamvertizing; the more you do... the more resistance there
will be
3. Check out other programs... they might be a lot cheaper... and do
just the same or even more!

Have a nice day... and a life
Dick

[m.e.nickolas]

check headers

[null@zilch.com]

On Sat, 02 Aug 2003 14:57:10 GMT, m.e.nickolas <1@2.3> wrote:

>check headers

Can't say I understand what you're driving at. If your ISP is epix
then why is comcast listed as the abuse contact?

Anyway, if you are a customer of epix in Pennsylvania, I have a off
topic question for you if you're using their Jack Flash DSL. If you
are, please drop me a email at artnpeg at epix dot net

Art
http://www.epix.net/~artnpeg

[Dick Hazeleger]

Malev wrote:

> On Fri, 01 Aug 2003 23:41:19 -0000, "Dick Hazeleger"
> <Dick@post_it_in_the_newsgroup.com> wrote:
>
>
> <snip - whole crapware spam quoted>
>
>
>
> >I'd love to test EE under all kinds of different circumstances, but
> >since they are not too eager to give the buyer a "try before you buy"
> >option (I checked the place from top to bottom), I am not too eager
> to >waste my money.
>
> Then, don't spamvertize their crapware by quoting and reposting their
> spam.

OK, Mr. Perfect... perhaps you didn't notice... the link was changed,
also you may consider that on some news server posts disappear, so it
would be *very handy* to have at least some of the text I refer to
present... Perhaps look before you leap??? Your "post" is currently
referring to... zilch, nothing...

Have a nice day, and join the cops... you seem to like their job!
Dick

[Slippery Jim DiGriz]

In article <pujtivslcatqqo25s8b7qnk0g8tgp61jhj@4ax.com>, Malev
<malev@selamer.com> writes
>On Fri, 01 Aug 2003 23:41:19 -0000, "Dick Hazeleger"
><Dick@post_it_in_the_newsgroup.com> wrote:
>
>
><snip - whole crapware spam quoted>
>
>
>
>>I'd love to test EE under all kinds of different circumstances, but
>>since they are not too eager to give the buyer a "try before you buy"
>>option (I checked the place from top to bottom), I am not too eager to
>>waste my money.
>
>Then, don't spamvertize their crapware by quoting and reposting their
>spam.

He left what he was replying to in context.

And he munged the link.
--
Slippery-Jim

[Jay T. Blocksom]

On Fri, 1 Aug 2003 16:08:06 -0700, in <alt.privacy.spyware>, "Joe Pyle"
<jpyle@aol.com> wrote:
>
[blatant spam snipped]

<http://evidence-eliminator-sucks.com/>
<http://groups.google.com/groups?q=%22Evidence+Eliminator%22+group:news.admi n.net-abuse.*&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&group=news.admin.net-abuse.*&sa=G&scoring=d>


--

Jay T. Blocksom
--------------------------------
Appropriate Technology, Inc.
usenet01[at]appropriate-tech.net


"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
NOTE: E-Mail address in "From:" line is INVALID! Remove +SPAMBLOCK to mail.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Unsolicited advertising sent to this E-Mail address is expressly prohibited
under USC Title 47, Section 227. Violators are subject to charge of up to
$1,500 per incident or treble actual costs, whichever is greater.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -