Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: Re: XEVSJGB

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Dick Hazeleger Guest

    Re: XEVSJGB

    Jay T. Blocksom wrote:

    > On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 06:21:54 GMT, in <alt.privacy.spyware>, forte
    > agent <pgmeyer@gte.net> wrote:
    > >
    > > On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 01:08:27 -0400, Jay T. Blocksom
    > > <usenet01+SPAMBLOCK@appropriate-tech.net> wrote:
    > >
    > >
    > > >
    > > >Then improve your system setup and operating habits so that

    > something > >like this won't happen again.
    > > This is something that the programs(I have) have not encountered in
    > > this formor there a setting I missed.It's relativly simple
    > > ,small,crudely done,loads fast ( a486dx2 might be slow enough to be
    > > able to stop it from loading) or I would not have been able to

    > remove > the parts I found.It appears to be dependant on inserting a
    > run > reference in the reg.
    >
    > I'm sorry, but... Even after re-reading it several times, I still
    > cannot make any sense whatsoever out of your article, particularly in
    > context. Please try again in English.


    Jay... how about this then. This is what the OP meant IMO:

    This (the drive by download) is something the programs that I have did
    not stop or report in this form or there must be a setting that I
    missed. It's (the drive by download) relativley simple, small and
    crudely done and downloads fast (a 486-DX2 might be slow enough to be
    able to stop it from loading) and I would have been able to remove the
    parts I found. It (the drive by download) seems to be depending on
    inserting a run (at boot time) in the registry.

    English is a difficult language... don't condemn those who don't speak
    it as well as you do.. I would love to see you posting in my native
    language!

    Regards
    Dick

  2. #2
    Jay T. Blocksom Guest

    Re: XEVSJGB

    On Sat, 02 Aug 2003 00:12:33 -0000, in <alt.privacy.spyware>, "Dick
    Hazeleger" <Dick@post_it_in_the_newsgroup.com> wrote:
    >

    [snip]
    >
    > English is a difficult language... don't condemn those who don't speak
    > it as well as you do..

    [snip]

    Not condemning. Just pointing out that (your attempt at "translation"
    notwithstanding) the message, as posted, was undecipherable. I never got
    the impression that this was due to the poster's primary language being
    something other than English.

    --

    Jay T. Blocksom
    --------------------------------
    Appropriate Technology, Inc.
    usenet01[at]appropriate-tech.net


    "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
    safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    -- Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759.

    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    NOTE: E-Mail address in "From:" line is INVALID! Remove +SPAMBLOCK to mail.
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    Unsolicited advertising sent to this E-Mail address is expressly prohibited
    under USC Title 47, Section 227. Violators are subject to charge of up to
    $1,500 per incident or treble actual costs, whichever is greater.
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •