Jay T. Blocksom wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 06:21:54 GMT, in <alt.privacy.spyware>, forte
> agent <pgmeyer@gte.net> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 01:08:27 -0400, Jay T. Blocksom
> > <usenet01+SPAMBLOCK@appropriate-tech.net> wrote:
> >
> >
> > >
> > >Then improve your system setup and operating habits so that
> something > >like this won't happen again.
> > This is something that the programs(I have) have not encountered in
> > this formor there a setting I missed.It's relativly simple
> > ,small,crudely done,loads fast ( a486dx2 might be slow enough to be
> > able to stop it from loading) or I would not have been able to
> remove > the parts I found.It appears to be dependant on inserting a
> run > reference in the reg.
>
> I'm sorry, but... Even after re-reading it several times, I still
> cannot make any sense whatsoever out of your article, particularly in
> context. Please try again in English.
Jay... how about this then. This is what the OP meant IMO:
This (the drive by download) is something the programs that I have did
not stop or report in this form or there must be a setting that I
missed. It's (the drive by download) relativley simple, small and
crudely done and downloads fast (a 486-DX2 might be slow enough to be
able to stop it from loading) and I would have been able to remove the
parts I found. It (the drive by download) seems to be depending on
inserting a run (at boot time) in the registry.
English is a difficult language... don't condemn those who don't speak
it as well as you do.. I would love to see you posting in my native
language!
Regards
Dick


Reply With Quote