Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Re: Earthstation5 -- zednet editorial says it hides your IP addy --- any comments ?

  1. #1
    Jay T. Blocksom Guest

    Re: Earthstation5 -- zednet editorial says it hides your IP addy --- any comments ?

    On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 12:06:32 GMT, in <alt.privacy.spyware>, TTBoy
    <Hungry@Wendys.org> wrote:
    >

    [snip]

    > F^ck another Wanker. get a life


    First:


    +----------+
    | PLEASE |
    | DO NOT |
    | FEED THE |
    | TROLLS |
    +----------+
    | |
    | |
    .\|.||/..


    Second:

    Please read AND UNDERSTAND:

    <http://www.faqs.org/faqs/net-abuse-faq/munging-address/>

    especially sections 3b. and 4d.

    --

    Jay T. Blocksom
    --------------------------------
    Appropriate Technology, Inc.
    usenet01[at]appropriate-tech.net


    "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
    safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    -- Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759.

    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    NOTE: E-Mail address in "From:" line is INVALID! Remove +SPAMBLOCK to mail.
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    Unsolicited advertising sent to this E-Mail address is expressly prohibited
    under USC Title 47, Section 227. Violators are subject to charge of up to
    $1,500 per incident or treble actual costs, whichever is greater.
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

  2. #2
    Jay T. Blocksom Guest

    Re: Earthstation5 -- zednet editorial says it hides your IP addy --- any comments ?

    On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 21:24:41 GMT, in <alt.privacy.spyware>, TTBoy
    <Hungry@Wendys.org> wrote:
    >

    [snip]
    >
    > Jay, what r u talking about?
    > TTBoy


    Did you read the document I referred you to (especially the sections I
    noted)?

    Did you understand it?

    (My guess, based on current evidence, is that the answer to at least one of
    these questions is "No".)

    --

    Jay T. Blocksom
    --------------------------------
    Appropriate Technology, Inc.
    usenet01[at]appropriate-tech.net


    "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
    safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    -- Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759.

    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    NOTE: E-Mail address in "From:" line is INVALID! Remove +SPAMBLOCK to mail.
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    Unsolicited advertising sent to this E-Mail address is expressly prohibited
    under USC Title 47, Section 227. Violators are subject to charge of up to
    $1,500 per incident or treble actual costs, whichever is greater.
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

  3. #3
    Jay T. Blocksom Guest

    Re: Earthstation5 -- zednet editorial says it hides your IP addy --- any comments ?

    On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:04:13 GMT, in <alt.privacy.spyware>, TTBoy
    <Hungry+Thirsty@Thursday-Friday.net> wrote:
    >
    > From: TTBoy <Hungry+Thirsty@Thursday-Friday.net>

    [snip]
    >
    > However, to make you feel netter, I've changed it.
    >
    > TTBoy


    And it's still WRONG.

    --

    Jay T. Blocksom
    --------------------------------
    Appropriate Technology, Inc.
    usenet01[at]appropriate-tech.net


    "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
    safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    -- Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759.

    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    NOTE: E-Mail address in "From:" line is INVALID! Remove +SPAMBLOCK to mail.
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    Unsolicited advertising sent to this E-Mail address is expressly prohibited
    under USC Title 47, Section 227. Violators are subject to charge of up to
    $1,500 per incident or treble actual costs, whichever is greater.
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •