Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Spyware Counter-Countermeasures?

  1. #1
    Kyle Thomas Pope Guest

    Spyware Counter-Countermeasures?

    Given the popularity of the two programs Ad-Aware and Spybot S&D as
    well as the many times they've been mentioned in this forum as
    must-have apps for anyone concerned with keeping spyware and malware
    off their machines, I am curious as to whether the spyware and malware
    distributors have ever tried releasing into their products routines
    designed to disable, destroy or bypass Ad-Aware or Spybot. It would
    seem to me a spyware vendor would like nothing better than a spyware
    app that cannot be detected and removed from the target system by any
    means.

    -----
    Kyle Pope

    "I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered!" - No. 6

    Keeper of the Edit List -

    (http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/columns/edit-list.php)


    ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
    http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
    ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

  2. #2
    mto Guest

    Re: Spyware Counter-Countermeasures?


    "Kyle Thomas Pope" <kurokyle@notmail.spam.not.com> wrote in message
    news:u6jlhvk7i3qg5dbcul6a0vdf4eok3ifive@4ax.com...
    > Given the popularity of the two programs Ad-Aware and Spybot S&D as
    > well as the many times they've been mentioned in this forum as
    > must-have apps for anyone concerned with keeping spyware and malware
    > off their machines, I am curious as to whether the spyware and malware
    > distributors have ever tried releasing into their products routines
    > designed to disable, destroy or bypass Ad-Aware or Spybot. It would
    > seem to me a spyware vendor would like nothing better than a spyware
    > app that cannot be detected and removed from the target system by any
    > means.
    >
    > -----


    GOD don't give them any ideas please ! The spyware folks keep trying and
    the AdAware/Spybot/firewall folks keep tracking them down in a never ending
    race. I did run across some code at MSNBC a while back that reset all the
    ZoneAlarm privacy settings for the MSNBC page to Allow. Turned off
    javascript for MSNBC & blocked akamai - which means no menu and no
    pictures - and it hasn't happened again. Pages load in a flash too - but
    ugleeeee as heck.



  3. #3
    Kyle Thomas Pope Guest

    Re: Spyware Counter-Countermeasures?

    On Sun, 20 Jul 2003 21:12:50 -0000, "Dick Hazeleger"
    <Dick@post_it_in_the_newsgroup.com> wrote:

    >BTW: Your sig... itsn't that from "The Prisoner"?


    There aren't many people still around who would recognize that show.
    That doesn't mean they haven't stopped trying to build The Village.

    -----
    Kyle Pope

    "I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered!" - No. 6

    Keeper of the Edit List -

    (http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/columns/edit-list.php)


    ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
    http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
    ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

  4. #4
    BoB Guest

    Re: Spyware Counter-Countermeasures?

    >Kyle Thomas Pope wrote:
    >
    >> Given the popularity of the two programs Ad-Aware and Spybot S&D as
    >> well as the many times they've been mentioned in this forum as
    >> must-have apps for anyone concerned with keeping spyware and malware
    >> off their machines, I am curious as to whether the spyware and malware
    >> distributors have ever tried releasing into their products routines
    >> designed to disable, destroy or bypass Ad-Aware or Spybot. It would
    >> seem to me a spyware vendor would like nothing better than a spyware
    >> app that cannot be detected and removed from the target system by any
    >> means.
    >> -----
    >> Kyle Pope


    You may want to look into adding SpywareBlaster to your arsenal.

    http://www.javacoolsoftware.com/spywareblaster/

    BoB


  5. #5
    Jay T. Blocksom Guest

    Re: Spyware Counter-Countermeasures?

    On Sun, 20 Jul 2003 10:14:21 -0700, in <alt.privacy.spyware>, Kyle Thomas
    Pope <kurokyle@notmail.spam.not.com> wrote:
    >

    [snip]

    > It would
    > seem to me a spyware vendor would like nothing better than a spyware
    > app that cannot be detected and removed from the target system by any
    > means.
    >

    [snip]

    Quite correct. Which is why, as useful as popular after-the-fact band-aids
    like AdAware or SS&D are, they can never be a proper substitute for simply
    not putting yourself in a position to need them in the first place. That
    means do NOT use known-bad software like MSIE/OE, DO use a decent firewall
    (a proper hardware-based one being STRONGLY preferred), do NOT routinely
    web-browse with scripting or Java enabled, DO use a local HTTP-filtering
    proxy (like Proxomitron, for example), do NOT install anything "blind"
    (i.e., DO have at least one known-good full backup in hand before starting
    any install or update, then use a decent installation tracker like InCtrl),
    do NOT enable ANY "automatic update" features in ANYTHING, including Windows
    itself), and so on and so on.

    In short: Practice Safe Computing.

    --

    Jay T. Blocksom
    --------------------------------
    Appropriate Technology, Inc.
    usenet01[at]appropriate-tech.net


    "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
    safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    -- Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759.

    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    NOTE: E-Mail address in "From:" line is INVALID! Remove +SPAMBLOCK to mail.
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    Unsolicited advertising sent to this E-Mail address is expressly prohibited
    under USC Title 47, Section 227. Violators are subject to charge of up to
    $1,500 per incident or treble actual costs, whichever is greater.
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •