Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Sponge: Question regarding Proximitron

  1. #1
    test Guest

    Sponge: Question regarding Proximitron

    First, thank you for providing such a valuable resource! It is very
    much appreciated. I have recommended you site to many. I have a
    question regarding proximitron. If a firewall such as Outpost is set
    to block ads, active X, and certain content, and certain cookies, is
    proximitron redundant or still recommended? TIA

  2. #2
    test Guest

    Re: Sponge: Question regarding Proximitron

    sponge wrote:
    >
    > On Sun, 06 Jul 2003 08:38:04 -0400, test <test@120.0.0.1> wrote:
    >
    > >First, thank you for providing such a valuable resource! It is very
    > >much appreciated. I have recommended you site to many. I have a
    > >question regarding proximitron. If a firewall such as Outpost is set
    > >to block ads, active X, and certain content, and certain cookies, is
    > >proximitron redundant or still recommended? TIA

    >
    > You're welcome. Glad to help.
    >
    > I'd keep Proxomitron. For one, I don't think Outpost has the ability
    > to filter secured (SSL) connections, which Proxo does. (I STRONGLY
    > recommend setting it up to do this if you haven't yet!) Also, while
    > Outpost has some good script-blocking mechanisms, but they are by no
    > means complete. When I checked out version 1 in March (1.2, I think),
    > it seemed like it only either outright allowed or outright denied the
    > running of JavaScript, Java, ActiveX, or VBScript. Although that's
    > great for ActiveX and VBScript, do that with JavaScript and you'll
    > find a lot of the Internet will suddently become inaccessible. Putting
    > it another way, it does very little content-filtering. Outpost does
    > eliminate the need for DNSKong, provided you add in any missing
    > entries from a current DNSKong blocklist. It's worth pointing out that
    > DNSKong (and HOSTS) uses a completely different method than Proxo:
    > they filter potential maliciousness by totally blocking access to the
    > offending sites, whereas Proxo filters out potential maliciousness
    > embedded in websites which are otherwise desirable to visit.
    >


    Thanks so much Sponge. I appreciate it and will take your advice.

    > Sponge
    > Sponge's Anti-Spyware Source
    > www.geocities.com/yosponge


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •